Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #21118 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-22 10:06 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-07-23 08:39 +1000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 353 — 49 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-22 10:06 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 10:23 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 08:56 +1000
anonymous sims in EU (was: Who pays for a phone..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-07-23 20:21 +0200
Re: anonymous sims in EU tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-03 20:04 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 03:22 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 10:27 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-22 17:00 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-22 13:26 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 10:00 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 14:22 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-07-22 10:07 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-22 20:06 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? DevilsPGD <boogabooga@crazyhat.net> - 2015-07-22 13:13 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 09:08 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Chris Blunt <mail@nospam.com> - 2015-07-24 11:22 +0800
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 14:36 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:12 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 19:34 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 16:58 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 17:51 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 09:57 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-24 14:32 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Wolfgang Barth <barthwo@spamfence.net> - 2015-07-24 15:38 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-07-24 09:26 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:22 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-07-25 11:19 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:17 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-07-25 11:18 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 19:47 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-27 09:46 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 03:50 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 06:59 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-04 16:21 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 08:52 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 05:30 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-04 19:33 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-06 09:39 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 12:17 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 05:41 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-04 17:25 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 05:26 +1000
voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-05 20:08 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-05 14:58 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-05 15:16 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 12:41 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-05 16:03 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 06:24 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 13:34 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 04:51 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-10-21 19:45 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 09:17 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-10-24 17:49 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 13:40 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "NotMe" <me@privacy.net> - 2015-10-24 19:03 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-25 09:52 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 22:28 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Walter Briscoe <wbriscoe@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2015-10-25 08:17 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 10:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-10-25 18:50 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-25 18:00 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 10:16 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-26 07:24 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 10:13 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-27 07:09 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 20:03 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-27 18:33 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "NotMe" <me@privacy.net> - 2015-10-26 08:07 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-10-25 14:58 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "NotMe" <me@privacy.net> - 2015-10-25 17:10 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-10-26 10:08 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 10:09 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-26 07:27 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 10:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <slocombjbEDIT@gmail.xyz> - 2015-10-27 07:11 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 20:09 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Walter Briscoe <wbriscoe@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2015-10-26 21:24 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 23:18 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 13:22 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 13:41 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 14:53 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-06 15:35 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 23:26 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-06 16:35 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 09:46 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 14:40 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-07 06:02 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-08 01:09 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 14:04 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas DevilsPGD <boogabooga@crazyhat.net> - 2015-08-09 00:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-08-09 12:42 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2015-08-10 00:18 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-08-09 17:50 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-09 23:19 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-09 23:10 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 08:43 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 13:40 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-11 00:21 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 06:57 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-11 09:57 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:20 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-12 11:21 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-12 19:50 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-12 16:21 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-13 12:08 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-13 09:58 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-13 17:04 +0200
security concept "rule of least priviledge" (was: voting booths in repu areas) Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-17 16:42 -0400
Re: security concept "rule of least priviledge" (was: voting booths in repu areas) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-18 10:08 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 06:26 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-13 09:38 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-13 17:14 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-13 11:42 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-13 18:47 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-13 14:22 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 07:00 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-14 11:34 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 06:53 +0700
what's entrapment (was: voting booths in republican areas) Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-15 14:13 +0000
Re: what's entrapment (was: voting booths in republican areas) John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:20 +0700
Re: what's entrapment Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-18 22:06 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 06:43 +0700
prosecutors do not care about guilt (was: voting booths in republican areas) Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-15 13:42 +0000
Re: prosecutors do not care about guilt (was: voting booths in republican areas) John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:08 +0700
Re: prosecutors do not care about guilt (was: voting booths in republican areas) Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-16 17:14 +0200
Re: prosecutors do not care about guilt Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-17 22:57 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-12 13:07 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-08-12 18:31 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-12 22:44 -0400
why disclose personal info (was: voting booths in republican areas) Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-15 13:20 +0000
Re: why disclose personal info David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-08-15 15:12 +0100
Re: why disclose personal info Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-08-15 15:08 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:26 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:23 -0700
accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-15 09:50 -0400
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) lew <citrustwosac@google.mailer.company.invalid> - 2015-08-15 16:36 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 10:55 -0700
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-15 14:44 -0500
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 19:34 -0700
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:54 +0700
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-18 11:02 +1000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-22 12:55 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-22 19:08 +0200
security vs. manners (was: accommodating unreasonable searches..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-24 00:48 +0200
Re: security vs. manners Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-24 14:18 -0400
Re: security vs. manners The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:59 -0700
Re: security vs. manners Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-25 13:40 +0200
Re: security vs. manners Travis Bickle <3S96@taxi.net> - 2015-08-25 12:31 -0400
Re: security vs. manners lew <citrustwosac@google.mailer.company.invalid> - 2015-08-25 16:38 +0000
Re: security vs. manners "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-26 09:29 -0400
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 10:19 -0400
Re: security vs. manners "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-26 11:45 -0400
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 13:53 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-26 14:39 -0500
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 16:56 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-26 16:08 -0500
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:33 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-26 17:32 -0500
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-26 19:51 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-26 18:59 -0500
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-27 08:42 -0400
Re: security vs. manners BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-27 09:24 -0500
Re: security vs. manners tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-26 22:52 -0400
Re: security vs. manners The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 09:57 -0700
Re: security vs. manners Bob Henson <rh547477@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 15:36 +0100
Re: security vs. manners "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2015-08-25 21:04 -0400
Re: security vs. manners tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-26 03:25 -0400
Re: security vs. manners "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-26 09:26 -0400
Re: security vs. manners The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 12:18 -0700
Re: security vs. manners (was: accommodating unreasonable searches..) TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-25 08:36 -0400
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2015-08-16 23:19 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) "Stuart McCall" <smccall@myunrealbox.com> - 2015-08-17 18:08 +0100
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-17 17:22 -0400
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2015-08-17 23:15 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) "Stuart McCall" <smccall@myunrealbox.com> - 2015-08-18 17:11 +0100
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2015-08-18 23:03 +0000
Re: accommodating unreasonable searches - bad idea (was: voting booths..) Joe Makowiec <makowiec@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-19 13:53 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas John B. <johnbslocomb@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 06:49 +0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-06 17:25 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 19:51 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 19:31 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 21:56 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-06 20:51 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-06 21:48 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 19:29 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-07 15:40 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-07 00:08 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-07 21:08 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-08 01:04 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 13:58 +1000
do absentee voters need photo id? (was: voting booths in republican areas) Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-08 14:03 +0200
Re: do absentee voters need photo id? (was: voting booths in republican areas) Elias <elias@nowherenohow.com> - 2015-08-08 10:02 -0500
Re: do absentee voters need photo id? (was: voting booths in republican areas) Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-08 21:28 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas "JHY" <JHY5566@nospam.com> - 2015-08-06 15:23 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas News <News@Group.Post> - 2015-08-06 07:00 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 04:59 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:33 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-06 15:34 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 18:50 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 16:55 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 09:12 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 08:40 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-06 07:26 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 12:16 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 13:24 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 12:16 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 13:22 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-06 07:35 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-08-06 14:36 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 12:18 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 13:31 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:46 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 14:04 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 12:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 14:27 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:44 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 13:58 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 12:12 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:36 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-10 20:05 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 06:18 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-05 15:27 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 13:38 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 15:25 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-05 15:19 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 09:07 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 08:38 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-06 07:25 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 11:11 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-06 07:31 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 12:02 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 11:14 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:38 -0700
leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-07 14:58 +0200
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-07 10:56 -0400
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 05:16 +1000
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-25 22:45 +0200
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-26 09:24 -0400
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-27 13:47 +0000
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-27 10:20 -0400
q) campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? a) education Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-09-03 08:44 +0000
comp.mobile.android "The Sorceress of Qar" <sorceress@qar.qanar.com> - 2015-08-27 09:23 -0500
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-27 13:01 -0400
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201509.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-09-06 00:12 +0200
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-08 16:21 -0700
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-22 23:11 +0200
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 20:54 -0700
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-08-22 23:40 -0500
Bev's reverse logic (was: leader's campaigns..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-09-03 09:22 +0200
Re: Bev's reverse logic David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-09-03 08:44 +0100
Re: leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-23 08:49 -0400
small campaign donations (was: leader's campaigns..) Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-31 16:06 -0400
leader's campaigns should be financed by banks, or education? (was: vot booths..) Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-08-12 04:08 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> - 2015-08-05 18:13 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 16:02 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Mike Yetto <unet.lighthouse@xoxy.net> - 2015-08-06 18:27 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> - 2015-08-07 12:36 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-07 12:38 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-10 08:51 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-10 22:28 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-11 08:53 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-11 01:06 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-11 10:25 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-11 17:46 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-08-12 09:54 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-05 19:00 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> - 2015-08-07 12:39 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) Bert <bert@iphouse.com> - 2015-08-06 16:14 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 09:07 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-18 09:49 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 11:46 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-18 12:38 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 18:51 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-19 11:14 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 08:31 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-19 12:56 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 11:57 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-19 15:04 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 12:22 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-19 15:36 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 06:09 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 13:10 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:03 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 12:39 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Joe Makowiec <makowiec@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-19 20:09 +0000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 14:27 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 14:58 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 16:10 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-20 08:32 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:14 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-24 08:33 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-24 09:37 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 15:27 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:13 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-19 16:34 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-19 14:46 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-20 12:40 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-20 09:55 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-20 10:14 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-20 22:35 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:09 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-24 11:02 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-19 00:03 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 19:01 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2015-08-19 19:08 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 09:34 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas Axel Berger <Axel_Berger@B.Maus.De> - 2015-08-18 23:57 +0200
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-18 19:05 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 09:28 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2015-08-19 19:14 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2015-08-19 09:09 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-19 07:15 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 05:56 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 05:52 +1000
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 13:15 -0700
Re: voting booths in republican areas David Solimano <david@solimano.org> - 2015-08-06 22:52 -0400
Re: voting booths in republican areas BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-08-06 21:59 -0500
Re: voting booths in republican areas The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 20:26 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 14:03 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 13:11 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 05:34 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 20:04 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Dieghettino <d@casa.mia> - 2015-07-26 06:41 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 08:45 +1000
non-EU travellers must carry passports (was: Who pays..) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-01 20:26 +0200
Re: non-EU travellers must carry passports cl@isbd.net - 2015-08-01 21:33 +0100
Re: non-EU travellers must carry passports tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-03 23:11 -0400
Re: non-EU travellers must carry passports cl@isbd.net - 2015-08-04 14:25 +0100
Re: non-EU travellers must carry passports Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201508.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2015-08-05 18:56 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 04:05 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 07:03 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-04 14:11 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-04 11:19 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 12:19 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 12:32 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-04 15:40 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-08-04 14:15 -0700
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 05:36 +1000
id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-08-05 20:05 +0000
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-08-05 13:19 -0700
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 04:46 -0400
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 09:10 -0400
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2015-08-06 14:51 -0400
Re: id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> - 2015-08-06 14:58 -0400
id required at New Mexico's illegal checkpoints? *no* Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-08-08 08:48 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-26 18:45 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 10:04 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-27 09:51 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2015-07-28 09:30 +0200
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 20:24 +1000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-25 19:57 +0000
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-07-25 16:57 -0400
Re: Who pays for a phone call to a US phone number, italy to italy? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 08:39 +1000
Page 14 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 … 18 Next page →
| From | Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 08:53 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mqc64h$uo$1@news.sap-ag.de> |
| In reply to | #21939 |
Am 11.08.2015 um 04:28 schrieb tlvp: > On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 08:51:45 +0200, Michael Eyd wrote, anent straight > lines: > >> ... two points ... can be used to >> define one ... > > Oh? What straight line on the surface of the earth do you think the earth's > north pole and south pole define? Somewhere between 'none' and 'an infinity number of lines'. Depending on some boundary conditions any of these answers can be correct (or not). Btw, nobody was talking about being bound to the surface of a three-dimensional shape (like the earth). And in general (without that condition) the straight line you're looking for is the (rotational) axis of our beloved planet. :-) Simple enough. Best regards, Michael
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 01:06 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <110820150106449818%leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> |
| In reply to | #21946 |
In article <mqc64h$uo$1@news.sap-ag.de>, Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> wrote: > Btw, nobody was talking about being bound to the surface of a > three-dimensional shape (like the earth). And in general (without that > condition) the straight line you're looking for is the (rotational) axis > of our beloved planet. :-) Simple enough. Yet less than (guessed but probably exaggerated one million people)/(population of the earth) may know that. Two points define a straight line which works for nearly everyone and nearly everywhere in the real world. No? leo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 10:25 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mqcbin$60a$1@news.sap-ag.de> |
| In reply to | #21947 |
Am 11.08.2015 um 10:06 schrieb Leonard Blaisdell: > In article <mqc64h$uo$1@news.sap-ag.de>, Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> > wrote: > >> Btw, nobody was talking about being bound to the surface of a >> three-dimensional shape (like the earth). And in general (without that >> condition) the straight line you're looking for is the (rotational) axis >> of our beloved planet. :-) Simple enough. > > Yet less than (guessed but probably exaggerated one million > people)/(population of the earth) may know that. Two points define a > straight line which works for nearly everyone and nearly everywhere in > the real world. No? Basically everybody would agree to that, however if we want to really go nitpicking then two points are just two points. They *can* be used to define a straight line, but in their own rights and in the most simple description they're just two ordinary points, somewhere in an n-dimensional space (with n>=1). Btw, as you didn't state that those two points are at different coordinates (=places), they may well be identical, and in that case they would not only define one straight line, but an infinite number of straight lines. ;-) Isn't math (geometry in particular) beautiful? It can explain complex things rather simple, and can make simple things rather complex. :-) Best regards, Michael
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 17:46 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <110820151746057972%leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> |
| In reply to | #21948 |
In article <mqcbin$60a$1@news.sap-ag.de>, Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> wrote: > Isn't math (geometry in particular) beautiful? It can explain complex > things rather simple, and can make simple things rather complex. :-) It really is. I've been away from math for a loooooong time. The highest I achieved was diffy q. Things may be different now, but there used to be a right answer, a infinite amount of wrong answers and a correct path to win. That suited me. leo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 09:54 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mqeu46$r1m$1@news.sap-ag.de> |
| In reply to | #21967 |
Am 12.08.2015 um 02:46 schrieb Leonard Blaisdell: > In article <mqcbin$60a$1@news.sap-ag.de>, Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> > wrote: > >> Isn't math (geometry in particular) beautiful? It can explain complex >> things rather simple, and can make simple things rather complex. :-) > > It really is. I've been away from math for a loooooong time. The > highest I achieved was diffy q. Things may be different now, but there > used to be a right answer, a infinite amount of wrong answers and a > correct path to win. That suited me. That way of thinking only holds true for the bigger part of school math, at least according to the teaching plans here in Germany. But the higher the math gets, the less unique the solutions tend to get. Integration of more complex formulas e.g. can usually (or at least many times) be done in a number of different ways/approaches. Some of them lead to simpler results or faster to the same result than other approaches - but in the end all of them are (mathematically) correct. What your teacher thinks about them is an altogether different question... ;-) And if you go even more complex, say e.g. you want to solve Einstein's equations from the general theory of relativity, there are still new solutions being found basically every year (AFAIK). Whether those solutions are relevant (for the 'real world', whatever that is from the point of view of Einstein's successors) or not is an altogether different question (which sometime will only be answered decades later). So much for 'unique solution'... ;-) Best regards, Michael
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 19:00 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <qr85saduba7euc6o4lb2njo8hbqi1ta2tc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #21711 |
On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 18:13:47 -0400, Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> wrote: >Hey, he's on a roll-- let him go. Libbies just make shit up that sounds >good. For them, a straight line is often defined by just one point >rather than the two it takes the rest of us... Another idiot who only paints with a broad brush. Figures.... considering his moniker, a hillbilly-moonshiner from Maynardville, Tennessee.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 12:39 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mq2mva$4sp$2@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #21713 |
On 8/5/15 8:00 PM, BobbyK wrote: > On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 18:13:47 -0400, Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> > wrote: > >> Hey, he's on a roll-- let him go. Libbies just make shit up that sounds >> good. For them, a straight line is often defined by just one point >> rather than the two it takes the rest of us... > > Another idiot who only paints with a broad brush. Figures.... > considering his moniker, a hillbilly-moonshiner from Maynardville, > Tennessee. > Have to in this NG, Incisive, penetrating analyses go zooming by the most vocal of the posters here;-) -- "My name is Lieutenant Aldo Raine and I'm putting together a special team, and I need me eight soldiers..."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bert <bert@iphouse.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 16:14 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas (was: Who pays..) |
| Message-ID | <XnsA4EE728E36317VeebleFetzer@127.0.0.1> |
| In reply to | #21695 |
In news:mptma8$feh$1@dont-email.me "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote: > Can you cite anything that proves your claim that Democrats have less > wealth than Republicans? Is there no trolling that's so obvious or a post so far off-topic for a group that you won't bite on it? -- bert@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 09:07 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mqvajt$2tl$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #21695 |
A little late, but I only just now stumbled across this OT thread: On 08/05/2015 02:58 PM, PAS wrote: > Where do you get your information that polling places in Republican > strongholds require a higher standard of proof of identity? The > standard of identity is the same across an entire state, it does not > differ from one area of a state to another. In New York, we walk into > or polling place, say who we are, then the poll worker looks up our name > on the list and we sign our name. If I know the name and address of > someone else, I can easily claim to be that person and vote fraudulently. > You'd be allowed to commit that fraud only if: A. You can forge a passable signature (a crime in NY), or B. The inspectors aren't doing their jobs as they should. I'm a Voting Inspector in Upstate NY. Have been for years. Comparing your signature to the one in the book is the way we check your ID. This would be the same way absentee and military ballots are checked for ID. Are you saying that the same standard shouldn't be applied to ALL voters? How do you check a voter photo ID for a military ballot? Or are you saying that there shouldn't be absentee or military voting? In NY, inspectors are selected from registered members of the top two vote-getting parties in the last gubernatorial election. In effect, this means that they are Democrat and Republican. Independents or members of other parties need not apply. Any action, from checking in voters to opening and closing the polls, to verifying the counts afterward MUST be performed by members of BOTH parties, so they can watch each other for possible tampering. Even the door to the room storing the voting machines has TWO locks, with a key in the possession of the commissioners from EACH party. The old lever machines we used to use, before HAVA, were subject to breakdown and had no verification of accuracy. The machines we use now in my county have redundant memories of the vote count. One is on a memory card that is taken to the county Board of Elections at the end of the day. Another memory card is sealed in the machine. And, the paper ballots can be scanned again for verification. A tamperer would have to tamper with all three in the space of a half hour, an extremely difficult task. Machines are subject to random testing for accuracy, and so far none have failed, to my knowledge. We have had local elections that would have turned on one vote, but by far the majority of them would not be affected by the tiny number of fraudulent voters that might slip through. It would take a huge, very organized movement to sway an election one way or another by fraud. Do you really think such a thing would go undetected? We inspectors aren't perfect, even the Republican ones like me, but most of us do our very best to do our jobs. I for one resent the implication that we are so criminally incompetent as to attempt to throw an election one way or another. TJ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 09:49 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mqvd2k$brm$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #22074 |
"TJ" <TJ@noneofyour.business> wrote in message news:mqvajt$2tl$1@dont-email.me... >A little late, but I only just now stumbled across this OT thread: > > On 08/05/2015 02:58 PM, PAS wrote: > >> Where do you get your information that polling places in Republican >> strongholds require a higher standard of proof of identity? The >> standard of identity is the same across an entire state, it does not >> differ from one area of a state to another. In New York, we walk >> into >> or polling place, say who we are, then the poll worker looks up our >> name >> on the list and we sign our name. If I know the name and address of >> someone else, I can easily claim to be that person and vote >> fraudulently. >> > > You'd be allowed to commit that fraud only if: > A. You can forge a passable signature (a crime in NY), or > B. The inspectors aren't doing their jobs as they should. > > I'm a Voting Inspector in Upstate NY. Have been for years. Comparing > your signature to the one in the book is the way we check your ID. > This would be the same way absentee and military ballots are checked > for ID. Are you saying that the same standard shouldn't be applied to > ALL voters? How do you check a voter photo ID for a military ballot? > Or are you saying that there shouldn't be absentee or military voting? > > In NY, inspectors are selected from registered members of the top two > vote-getting parties in the last gubernatorial election. In effect, > this means that they are Democrat and Republican. Independents or > members of other parties need not apply. Any action, from checking in > voters to opening and closing the polls, to verifying the counts > afterward MUST be performed by members of BOTH parties, so they can > watch each other for possible tampering. Even the door to the room > storing the voting machines has TWO locks, with a key in the > possession of the commissioners from EACH party. > > The old lever machines we used to use, before HAVA, were subject to > breakdown and had no verification of accuracy. The machines we use now > in my county have redundant memories of the vote count. One is on a > memory card that is taken to the county Board of Elections at the end > of the day. Another memory card is sealed in the machine. And, the > paper ballots can be scanned again for verification. A tamperer would > have to tamper with all three in the space of a half hour, an > extremely difficult task. Machines are subject to random testing for > accuracy, and so far none have failed, to my knowledge. > > We have had local elections that would have turned on one vote, but by > far the majority of them would not be affected by the tiny number of > fraudulent voters that might slip through. It would take a huge, very > organized movement to sway an election one way or another by fraud. Do > you really think such a thing would go undetected? > > We inspectors aren't perfect, even the Republican ones like me, but > most of us do our very best to do our jobs. I for one resent the > implication that we are so criminally incompetent as to attempt to > throw an election one way or another. > > TJ I made an implication that you are criminally incompetent? Please tell me where I stated that. I can easily commit fraud if I wanted to. It's a rare occasion that the poll workers actually compare a signature. I've seen it up close, I've worked as a poll watcher. I've noted it whenever I've voted, not once was a signature compared. I sign the card in the book, I'm given my ballot, the poll worker records my name on a sheet with a sequential number. That's it. Where I vote, I see the same folks "manning" the polls every time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 11:46 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mqvjtu$78c$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #22075 |
On 08/18/2015 09:49 AM, PAS wrote: > "TJ" <TJ@noneofyour.business> wrote in message > news:mqvajt$2tl$1@dont-email.me... >> A little late, but I only just now stumbled across this OT thread: >> >> On 08/05/2015 02:58 PM, PAS wrote: >> >>> Where do you get your information that polling places in Republican >>> strongholds require a higher standard of proof of identity? The >>> standard of identity is the same across an entire state, it does not >>> differ from one area of a state to another. In New York, we walk into >>> or polling place, say who we are, then the poll worker looks up our name >>> on the list and we sign our name. If I know the name and address of >>> someone else, I can easily claim to be that person and vote >>> fraudulently. >>> >> >> You'd be allowed to commit that fraud only if: >> A. You can forge a passable signature (a crime in NY), or >> B. The inspectors aren't doing their jobs as they should. >> >> I'm a Voting Inspector in Upstate NY. Have been for years. Comparing >> your signature to the one in the book is the way we check your ID. >> This would be the same way absentee and military ballots are checked >> for ID. Are you saying that the same standard shouldn't be applied to >> ALL voters? How do you check a voter photo ID for a military ballot? >> Or are you saying that there shouldn't be absentee or military voting? >> >> In NY, inspectors are selected from registered members of the top two >> vote-getting parties in the last gubernatorial election. In effect, >> this means that they are Democrat and Republican. Independents or >> members of other parties need not apply. Any action, from checking in >> voters to opening and closing the polls, to verifying the counts >> afterward MUST be performed by members of BOTH parties, so they can >> watch each other for possible tampering. Even the door to the room >> storing the voting machines has TWO locks, with a key in the >> possession of the commissioners from EACH party. >> >> The old lever machines we used to use, before HAVA, were subject to >> breakdown and had no verification of accuracy. The machines we use now >> in my county have redundant memories of the vote count. One is on a >> memory card that is taken to the county Board of Elections at the end >> of the day. Another memory card is sealed in the machine. And, the >> paper ballots can be scanned again for verification. A tamperer would >> have to tamper with all three in the space of a half hour, an >> extremely difficult task. Machines are subject to random testing for >> accuracy, and so far none have failed, to my knowledge. >> >> We have had local elections that would have turned on one vote, but by >> far the majority of them would not be affected by the tiny number of >> fraudulent voters that might slip through. It would take a huge, very >> organized movement to sway an election one way or another by fraud. Do >> you really think such a thing would go undetected? >> >> We inspectors aren't perfect, even the Republican ones like me, but >> most of us do our very best to do our jobs. I for one resent the >> implication that we are so criminally incompetent as to attempt to >> throw an election one way or another. >> >> TJ > > I made an implication that you are criminally incompetent? Please tell > me where I stated that. > If I allow people to vote who are not eligible to vote at my district, I am being criminally incompetent. Isn't that what you said I and my counterparts across the state are doing? > I can easily commit fraud if I wanted to. It's a rare occasion that the > poll workers actually compare a signature. I've seen it up close, I've > worked as a poll watcher. I've noted it whenever I've voted, not once > was a signature compared. I sign the card in the book, I'm given my > ballot, the poll worker records my name on a sheet with a sequential > number. That's it. Where I vote, I see the same folks "manning" the > polls every time. I suppose I'm lucky in that regard. I work in a district in the rural township where I grew up, and I know at least half the voters that come in personally. Writing the name down on a separate list is now banned in my county as violating voter privacy. It's a holdover from the old machines where it was useful in keeping track of the proper number in the book, but is no longer needed with the new machines and paper ballots. In my county, you sign in a box in the book next to a similar box containing the "official" signature. When I do that job, I watch as the signature (for those I don't know) is being written to see if it compares with the other one. I don't have to actually read it to do that, I just have to see the handwriting. Most voters are watching what they are writing, not watching me watching them. The ballot number is written on a line next to the signature boxes, and the inspector puts his or her initials on another line. The ballot itself has no number, but there is one on the stub left behind. If the paper ballot is spoiled, the voter gets a replacement, and its number is also noted in the book. The voter gets three chances, that's it. Your county may be different. I wouldn't know. TJ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 12:38 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mqvmv6$jqo$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #22077 |
"TJ" <TJ@noneofyour.business> wrote in message news:mqvjtu$78c$1@dont-email.me... > On 08/18/2015 09:49 AM, PAS wrote: >> "TJ" <TJ@noneofyour.business> wrote in message >> news:mqvajt$2tl$1@dont-email.me... >>> A little late, but I only just now stumbled across this OT thread: >>> >>> On 08/05/2015 02:58 PM, PAS wrote: >>> >>>> Where do you get your information that polling places in Republican >>>> strongholds require a higher standard of proof of identity? The >>>> standard of identity is the same across an entire state, it does >>>> not >>>> differ from one area of a state to another. In New York, we walk >>>> into >>>> or polling place, say who we are, then the poll worker looks up our >>>> name >>>> on the list and we sign our name. If I know the name and address >>>> of >>>> someone else, I can easily claim to be that person and vote >>>> fraudulently. >>>> >>> >>> You'd be allowed to commit that fraud only if: >>> A. You can forge a passable signature (a crime in NY), or >>> B. The inspectors aren't doing their jobs as they should. >>> >>> I'm a Voting Inspector in Upstate NY. Have been for years. Comparing >>> your signature to the one in the book is the way we check your ID. >>> This would be the same way absentee and military ballots are checked >>> for ID. Are you saying that the same standard shouldn't be applied >>> to >>> ALL voters? How do you check a voter photo ID for a military ballot? >>> Or are you saying that there shouldn't be absentee or military >>> voting? >>> >>> In NY, inspectors are selected from registered members of the top >>> two >>> vote-getting parties in the last gubernatorial election. In effect, >>> this means that they are Democrat and Republican. Independents or >>> members of other parties need not apply. Any action, from checking >>> in >>> voters to opening and closing the polls, to verifying the counts >>> afterward MUST be performed by members of BOTH parties, so they can >>> watch each other for possible tampering. Even the door to the room >>> storing the voting machines has TWO locks, with a key in the >>> possession of the commissioners from EACH party. >>> >>> The old lever machines we used to use, before HAVA, were subject to >>> breakdown and had no verification of accuracy. The machines we use >>> now >>> in my county have redundant memories of the vote count. One is on a >>> memory card that is taken to the county Board of Elections at the >>> end >>> of the day. Another memory card is sealed in the machine. And, the >>> paper ballots can be scanned again for verification. A tamperer >>> would >>> have to tamper with all three in the space of a half hour, an >>> extremely difficult task. Machines are subject to random testing for >>> accuracy, and so far none have failed, to my knowledge. >>> >>> We have had local elections that would have turned on one vote, but >>> by >>> far the majority of them would not be affected by the tiny number of >>> fraudulent voters that might slip through. It would take a huge, >>> very >>> organized movement to sway an election one way or another by fraud. >>> Do >>> you really think such a thing would go undetected? >>> >>> We inspectors aren't perfect, even the Republican ones like me, but >>> most of us do our very best to do our jobs. I for one resent the >>> implication that we are so criminally incompetent as to attempt to >>> throw an election one way or another. >>> >>> TJ >> >> I made an implication that you are criminally incompetent? Please >> tell >> me where I stated that. >> > If I allow people to vote who are not eligible to vote at my district, > I am being criminally incompetent. Isn't that what you said I and my > counterparts across the state are doing? > >> I can easily commit fraud if I wanted to. It's a rare occasion that >> the >> poll workers actually compare a signature. I've seen it up close, >> I've >> worked as a poll watcher. I've noted it whenever I've voted, not >> once >> was a signature compared. I sign the card in the book, I'm given my >> ballot, the poll worker records my name on a sheet with a sequential >> number. That's it. Where I vote, I see the same folks "manning" the >> polls every time. > > I suppose I'm lucky in that regard. I work in a district in the rural > township where I grew up, and I know at least half the voters that > come in personally. > > Writing the name down on a separate list is now banned in my county as > violating voter privacy. It's a holdover from the old machines where > it was useful in keeping track of the proper number in the book, but > is no longer needed with the new machines and paper ballots. > > In my county, you sign in a box in the book next to a similar box > containing the "official" signature. When I do that job, I watch as > the signature (for those I don't know) is being written to see if it > compares with the other one. I don't have to actually read it to do > that, I just have to see the handwriting. Most voters are watching > what they are writing, not watching me watching them. The ballot > number is written on a line next to the signature boxes, and the > inspector puts his or her initials on another line. The ballot itself > has no number, but there is one on the stub left behind. If the paper > ballot is spoiled, the voter gets a replacement, and its number is > also noted in the book. The voter gets three chances, that's it. > > Your county may be different. I wouldn't know. In New York, we fill out a paper ballot by coloring in a circle next to the candidates name whom we are voting for the "Yes" or "No" circle if it's a ballot proposition. The ballot is fed into a scanner and then the votes are electronically recorded. The only thing I don't like about this system is that I will never know if my votes were tallied properly - there is no "receipt" available that would prove that my vote was cast correctly. We are left to just trust the system, although I give the system the benefit of the doubt since I'm not aware of any problems being reported of this nature. This system has been in place for a number of years.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 18:51 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mr0cqm$jqb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #22080 |
On 08/18/2015 12:38 PM, PAS wrote: > "TJ" <TJ@noneofyour.business> wrote in message > news:mqvjtu$78c$1@dont-email.me... >> >> Your county may be different. I wouldn't know. > > In New York, we fill out a paper ballot by coloring in a circle next to > the candidates name whom we are voting for the "Yes" or "No" circle if > it's a ballot proposition. The ballot is fed into a scanner and then > the votes are electronically recorded. The only thing I don't like > about this system is that I will never know if my votes were tallied > properly - there is no "receipt" available that would prove that my vote > was cast correctly. We are left to just trust the system, although I > give the system the benefit of the doubt since I'm not aware of any > problems being reported of this nature. This system has been in place > for a number of years. By "New York," I must assume you mean the city, as you appear to have disregarded that I'm also in New York, but upstate. Your county must have selected different machines than ours, because our machines have a "review" function that can show a voter what the machine has read and will cast before the vote is recorded. A "voting Systems Specialist" (two at each polling place, one Republican, one Democrat) uses a magnetic key to set up the review, which must be reset for each voter who requests it. The setup MUST be requested before the ballot is scanned. The selections are shown on a small LCD screen, and once the voter is satisfied he presses a button to cast the ballot. It's possible that your county doesn't advertise this capability, as it slows down the ballot-scanning process considerably. Mine makes a point of it, as many voters had the same complaint you have in the first year we used the machines. TJ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 11:14 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mr26de$c8k$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #22085 |
"TJ" <TJ@noneofyour.business> wrote in message news:mr0cqm$jqb$1@dont-email.me... > On 08/18/2015 12:38 PM, PAS wrote: >> "TJ" <TJ@noneofyour.business> wrote in message >> news:mqvjtu$78c$1@dont-email.me... >>> >>> Your county may be different. I wouldn't know. >> >> In New York, we fill out a paper ballot by coloring in a circle next >> to >> the candidates name whom we are voting for the "Yes" or "No" circle >> if >> it's a ballot proposition. The ballot is fed into a scanner and then >> the votes are electronically recorded. The only thing I don't like >> about this system is that I will never know if my votes were tallied >> properly - there is no "receipt" available that would prove that my >> vote >> was cast correctly. We are left to just trust the system, although I >> give the system the benefit of the doubt since I'm not aware of any >> problems being reported of this nature. This system has been in >> place >> for a number of years. > > By "New York," I must assume you mean the city, as you appear to have > disregarded that I'm also in New York, but upstate. Not NYC but Long Island. I didn't disregard that you live in NY but I thought I was replying to someone else, sorry. > Your county must have selected different machines than ours, because > our machines have a "review" function that can show a voter what the > machine has read and will cast before the vote is recorded. A "voting > Systems Specialist" (two at each polling place, one Republican, one > Democrat) uses a magnetic key to set up the review, which must be > reset for each voter who requests it. The setup MUST be requested > before the ballot is scanned. The selections are shown on a small LCD > screen, and once the voter is satisfied he presses a button to cast > the ballot. Suffolk County uses the "Image Cast" machine made by Dominion. Perhaps there is a record available as to how a vote is cast and the poll workers I questioned were simply wrong. I did ask hree different workers, all said there is no way to get a record of my vote. > It's possible that your county doesn't advertise this capability, as > it slows down the ballot-scanning process considerably. Mine makes a > point of it, as many voters had the same complaint you have in the > first year we used the machines. It could very well be that this isn't advertised as you say. There are two counties on Long Island, Nassau (the western county) and Suffolk (the eastern county). There are 1.4 millipon people in Nassua and 1.5 million in Suffolk. That makes for a lot of eligible voters in a small area and the process you described would slow down the process.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 08:31 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <190820150831508023%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #22102 |
In article <mr26de$c8k$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote: > It could very well be that this isn't advertised as you say. There are > two counties on Long Island, Nassau (the western county) and Suffolk > (the eastern county). There are two more counties on Long Island; Queens and Kings. They're part of NYC, but they are nevertheless counties on Long Island.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 12:56 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mr2ccs$4eb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #22103 |
"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message news:190820150831508023%michelle@michelle.org... > In article <mr26de$c8k$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> > wrote: > >> It could very well be that this isn't advertised as you say. There >> are >> two counties on Long Island, Nassau (the western county) and Suffolk >> (the eastern county). > > There are two more counties on Long Island; Queens and Kings. They're > part of NYC, but they are nevertheless counties on Long Island. Geographically, that's correct. Otherwise, no. Those are, as you said, NYC counties, not Long Island counties.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 11:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <190820151157157556%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #22104 |
In article <mr2ccs$4eb$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote: > "Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message > news:190820150831508023%michelle@michelle.org... > > In article <mr26de$c8k$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> > > wrote: > > > >> It could very well be that this isn't advertised as you say. There > >> are > >> two counties on Long Island, Nassau (the western county) and Suffolk > >> (the eastern county). > > > > There are two more counties on Long Island; Queens and Kings. They're > > part of NYC, but they are nevertheless counties on Long Island. > > Geographically, that's correct. Otherwise, no. Those are, as you said, > NYC counties, not Long Island counties. That is provincialism.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 15:04 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mr2jth$3du$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #22105 |
"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message news:190820151157157556%michelle@michelle.org... > In article <mr2ccs$4eb$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> > wrote: > >> "Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message >> news:190820150831508023%michelle@michelle.org... >> > In article <mr26de$c8k$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> It could very well be that this isn't advertised as you say. >> >> There >> >> are >> >> two counties on Long Island, Nassau (the western county) and >> >> Suffolk >> >> (the eastern county). >> > >> > There are two more counties on Long Island; Queens and Kings. >> > They're >> > part of NYC, but they are nevertheless counties on Long Island. >> >> Geographically, that's correct. Otherwise, no. Those are, as you >> said, >> NYC counties, not Long Island counties. > > That is provincialism. I'm not trying to get into a pis*ing contest here but you brought this subject up, not me. If you live in Queens or Kings County, you are a NYC resident, not a Long Island resident. If you live in Nassau and Suffolk County, you are a Long Island resident. It's pretty simple. No one who has ever come from Brooklyn would say "I'm from Long Island".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 12:22 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <190820151222348709%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #22106 |
In article <mr2jth$3du$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote: > >> >> It could very well be that this isn't advertised as you say. > >> >> There are two counties on Long Island, Nassau (the western > >> >> county) and Suffolk (the eastern county). > >> > > >> > There are two more counties on Long Island; Queens and Kings. > >> > They're part of NYC, but they are nevertheless counties on Long > >> > Island. > >> > >> Geographically, that's correct. Otherwise, no. Those are, as you > >> said, NYC counties, not Long Island counties. > > > > That is provincialism. > > I'm not trying to get into a pis*ing contest here but you brought > this subject up, not me. Well, you are the one who said there are two counties on Long Island > If you live in Queens or Kings County, you are a NYC resident, not a > Long Island resident. If you live in Nassau and Suffolk County, you > are a Long Island resident. It's pretty simple. No one who has ever > come from Brooklyn would say "I'm from Long Island". But those of us who lived in The Bronx, when going to visit friends or relatives in Queens, said we were going to "the Island". We didn't know anyone who lived in Brooklyn, so I don't know what we would have said if we would have had any. When I was five years old, and we were driving across the Bronx Whitestone Bridge, I asked my father, "If a seagull flies over the sea, what flies over the bay?" When he asked me what, I said, "A bagel." (Bay gull, get it?) It was my first (of many, to the dismay of all who knew and know me) pun.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "PAS" <ntotrr@optonline.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 15:36 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: voting booths in republican areas |
| Message-ID | <mr2lpd$b2k$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #22107 |
"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message news:190820151222348709%michelle@michelle.org... > In article <mr2jth$3du$1@dont-email.me>, PAS <ntotrr@optonline.net> > wrote: > >> >> >> It could very well be that this isn't advertised as you say. >> >> >> There are two counties on Long Island, Nassau (the western >> >> >> county) and Suffolk (the eastern county). >> >> > >> >> > There are two more counties on Long Island; Queens and Kings. >> >> > They're part of NYC, but they are nevertheless counties on Long >> >> > Island. >> >> >> >> Geographically, that's correct. Otherwise, no. Those are, as you >> >> said, NYC counties, not Long Island counties. >> > >> > That is provincialism. >> >> I'm not trying to get into a pis*ing contest here but you brought >> this subject up, not me. > > Well, you are the one who said there are two counties on Long Island > >> If you live in Queens or Kings County, you are a NYC resident, not a >> Long Island resident. If you live in Nassau and Suffolk County, you >> are a Long Island resident. It's pretty simple. No one who has ever >> come from Brooklyn would say "I'm from Long Island". > > But those of us who lived in The Bronx, when going to visit friends or > relatives in Queens, said we were going to "the Island". We didn't > know anyone who lived in Brooklyn, so I don't know what we would have > said if we would have had any. Traditionally, "the island" meant the suburban areas - Nassau and Suffolk. If it were up to me, we would secede from New York and become our own state (Nassau and Suffolk, that is, not Queens or Brooklyn - NYC can have 'em). > When I was five years old, and we were driving across the Bronx > Whitestone Bridge, I asked my father, "If a seagull flies over the > sea, > what flies over the bay?" When he asked me what, I said, "A bagel." > (Bay gull, get it?) It was my first (of many, to the dismay of all > who > knew and know me) pun. Groan! When you were very young, did you ever call the Throgs Neck Bridge "The Frog's Neck Bridge" like me niece used to?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 14 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 … 18 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web