Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #144333 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-11-24 19:20 -0500 |
| Last post | 2024-11-25 15:24 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 542 — 35 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 19:20 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 16:23 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 19:50 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 17:09 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 20:34 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 17:44 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 21:03 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 18:17 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 21:37 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 18:42 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 21:58 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 18:59 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 22:19 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 19:32 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-24 22:48 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 19:52 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 23:20 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 23:46 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-25 06:18 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 14:29 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 17:51 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 15:12 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 18:26 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 10:59 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 10:55 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 11:31 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-02 11:16 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 14:09 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-02 13:26 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 14:55 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-03 08:47 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Pierre <pierrej@shaw.ca> - 2024-12-03 09:51 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 10:50 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:35 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:33 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-11-25 22:32 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 23:15 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 23:46 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-25 07:08 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-25 07:46 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-25 08:43 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-25 08:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-25 10:32 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 08:32 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-26 09:58 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 10:35 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 11:13 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 10:45 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-27 12:01 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 12:32 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 12:45 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-27 13:50 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 14:19 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-27 14:32 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 15:05 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 12:28 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 15:54 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 15:58 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-02 11:25 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 14:16 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-02 13:41 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 14:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-03 09:09 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-02 11:24 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-02 13:49 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 14:28 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-02 16:11 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 16:38 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-03 08:58 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-03 13:34 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-04 10:55 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-04 12:45 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-04 09:59 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-04 13:17 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-04 13:01 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-04 12:59 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-03 14:03 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-04 11:00 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-27 16:26 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 16:56 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-02 11:27 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-02 11:21 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 14:13 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-02 13:33 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 14:56 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-03 08:52 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 11:32 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 15:08 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 12:32 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 16:00 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-27 16:00 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-02 11:18 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 14:10 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-02 13:30 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 10:37 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-26 10:06 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-26 10:03 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 14:32 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 17:54 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 15:15 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-11-27 00:04 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 19:16 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Yon Wane <"yonwane-lol!"@pac2.com> - 2024-11-26 22:27 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-27 08:29 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 11:18 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting ppd382 <xyz@vote.com> - 2025-03-11 08:13 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Mai Keister <m.keister@altopia.net> - 2025-03-11 13:59 -0700
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "jubox@ovens.net" <jubox@ovens.net> - 2025-03-18 17:48 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting orangeneck <orangeneck@127.0.0.1> - 2025-03-29 22:06 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:42 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 14:31 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 17:53 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 15:13 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 18:28 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 15:38 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 18:58 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 16:16 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 19:42 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 17:33 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 20:48 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-27 06:25 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 11:17 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-06 19:28 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-07 13:18 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 17:03 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 14:17 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 17:39 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 15:40 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 18:53 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 16:01 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 19:19 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 16:45 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 20:14 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 17:31 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 20:43 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 17:48 -0800
Microsoft Linux Distro (was: Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-08 01:53 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 20:58 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:00 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:59 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:56 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:48 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:38 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:36 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 09:48 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 12:55 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 10:01 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 13:13 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 10:24 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-09 13:56 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 10:57 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 08:56 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 14:02 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 11:21 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 14:29 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 11:33 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 09:02 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Wayne Kerr <waynek@msu.edu> - 2024-12-14 21:50 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-14 13:17 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 09:01 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Wayne Kerr <waynek@msu.edu> - 2024-12-14 21:14 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-14 13:17 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-14 16:21 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-14 13:34 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-14 17:09 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-14 14:25 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-14 17:32 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-14 14:41 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-14 17:51 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-14 15:04 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-15 05:56 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-15 09:24 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-15 13:30 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 11:38 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 15:05 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 12:26 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 15:58 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 13:10 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 18:07 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-16 19:56 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 10:39 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:30 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:16 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 13:20 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:33 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 13:43 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:51 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 14:52 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 12:35 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-17 15:39 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:53 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:52 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:52 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-15 15:42 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-15 15:48 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-15 16:47 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-15 17:01 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-15 22:34 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 10:25 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-16 11:40 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 12:02 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-16 12:50 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 12:54 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 11:08 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 14:13 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 11:31 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 14:36 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 11:47 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 15:22 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 12:37 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 16:09 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 13:13 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 18:18 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:25 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 13:39 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:45 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 14:50 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 12:35 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-17 15:45 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:02 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:14 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:01 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 11:56 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 11:55 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 11:54 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 11:54 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 11:53 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 11:50 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 11:48 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 11:46 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 11:13 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 14:35 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 11:45 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 15:20 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 12:37 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 16:10 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 13:14 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 18:20 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:25 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 13:41 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:46 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 14:51 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 12:36 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 16:09 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-17 16:34 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 19:19 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 16:22 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 20:26 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 18:21 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-18 09:03 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-18 09:24 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-18 13:01 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-18 10:36 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-18 14:03 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:41 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting will <willford@yahoo.com> - 2024-12-21 01:50 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-20 17:01 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 20:19 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-20 17:42 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 20:50 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-20 17:53 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 21:57 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-20 19:06 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 22:17 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-21 10:10 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-21 16:10 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:43 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-20 22:05 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 22:15 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 23:31 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-21 08:44 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-21 10:11 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-21 16:13 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Din004 <din004@oracle.com> - 2024-12-25 10:44 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-25 09:26 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-25 11:55 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-26 02:07 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-25 23:07 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting alex <alex_@pintrest.com> - 2024-12-26 00:44 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-26 09:39 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Jon Ball <jon-ball@spectrum.com> - 2024-12-26 22:09 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-26 13:37 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting wasabi <lotso@jollyroger.com> - 2024-12-28 14:33 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 14:36 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 17:43 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 14:47 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 17:55 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 15:55 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 19:00 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 16:02 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 20:30 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 19:02 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 22:07 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 19:42 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 22:48 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 19:53 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 23:04 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 20:07 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 23:16 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 21:53 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 14:09 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 11:21 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 14:34 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 11:37 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 14:47 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 12:15 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 15:22 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 12:42 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 16:08 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 16:40 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 19:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 17:10 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot> - 2024-12-30 04:09 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Red Zone <redzone@trump.com> - 2024-12-30 19:45 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 14:57 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 12:05 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 15:27 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-30 21:25 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2024-12-31 00:54 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-31 06:38 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot> - 2024-12-30 16:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-31 06:36 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:52 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 12:56 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 16:13 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 16:42 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 20:00 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 17:10 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 21:46 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 18:52 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 22:09 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 19:22 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 22:27 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-29 19:39 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:57 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:56 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:54 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:51 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:50 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:49 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:47 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:45 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:44 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Petry F." <petry_f@hushmail.com> - 2024-12-29 04:25 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 21:54 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:42 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-30 10:41 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-28 21:52 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-30 18:23 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 10:30 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 13:42 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 11:23 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 14:55 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 11:58 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 15:25 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 18:07 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 15:19 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 18:41 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 15:43 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-31 06:30 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-31 06:28 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-31 06:27 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 12:04 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 15:26 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 15:13 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 18:23 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 15:40 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 19:14 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-30 23:04 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 11:52 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Byrd <byrd@someoem.com> - 2025-01-02 03:02 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 21:08 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-01 18:44 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 22:01 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 22:12 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Rudy Ball <rudyball@gmx.com> - 2025-01-03 19:02 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 11:20 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 15:19 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 14:54 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 18:40 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 16:18 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 19:28 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 17:11 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 20:24 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 17:40 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 20:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 19:39 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 14:29 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 12:36 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 20:53 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 18:19 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 21:29 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 18:32 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 21:47 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 19:03 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 22:14 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 19:39 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 22:50 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 23:32 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 08:11 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Clint <clintb@infiniti.net> - 2025-01-13 00:36 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-13 09:16 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 08:11 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Rudy Johnson <rudyj@google.com> - 2025-01-21 14:06 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-21 14:18 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Sadler <sadler@msn.com> - 2025-01-26 06:28 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Rudy Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> - 2025-01-22 03:46 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 08:10 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 08:09 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting AlphaHeater <AlphaHeater21@6959.concepte.store> - 2025-01-06 02:50 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 08:07 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 08:07 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 08:05 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 08:05 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 08:03 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 07:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 07:57 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-31 06:34 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-31 06:32 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-31 06:25 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-01 07:31 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-28 21:50 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2024-12-29 01:30 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-28 21:49 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting wasabi <lotso@jollyroger.com> - 2024-12-28 15:57 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-28 16:03 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-26 08:39 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 19:24 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-26 11:05 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting ND beat Indy <choke@choke.choke> - 2024-12-20 21:37 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-21 09:35 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 20:17 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-20 17:18 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 20:30 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:41 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:39 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:37 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Gary M. Stewart <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2024-12-25 21:48 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:36 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:34 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:32 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 14:06 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:29 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:28 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:27 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:25 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:23 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:21 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:20 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:19 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:18 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 12:16 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 11:42 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 15:16 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 12:33 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 16:04 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 13:13 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 18:18 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:20 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-16 16:29 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 17:53 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-16 19:51 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 10:38 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:29 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:18 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 13:23 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:31 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 13:20 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 13:15 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 13:14 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 11:40 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 15:08 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 12:29 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 16:01 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 13:30 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 18:24 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-16 21:11 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-17 10:28 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 13:11 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 13:09 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 13:03 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-25 13:02 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting hank <none@invalid.org> - 2024-12-16 00:02 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-16 09:06 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-14 18:21 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting hank <none@invalid.org> - 2024-12-15 23:06 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-15 15:41 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Duc Nguyen <dnguyen@somecorp.org> - 2024-12-15 19:10 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-15 22:50 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-15 22:42 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-15 22:35 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 08:56 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 08:51 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 08:49 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:34 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:32 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:31 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-07 23:59 +0000
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:30 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Rudy Canoza <rc@thejollykone.con> - 2024-12-08 04:06 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:02 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting T. Walz <tampons4sale@dont-email.me> - 2024-12-08 12:41 +0100
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:29 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:28 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:27 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-09 13:46 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 08:48 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 09:25 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 11:11 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 11:09 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 11:07 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 11:00 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:38 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:36 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:36 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:31 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:31 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-24 22:41 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-24 23:13 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-24 23:47 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-25 06:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-25 07:44 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-25 08:18 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-25 08:35 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-25 08:58 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-25 09:09 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-25 10:40 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 08:35 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-26 09:59 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 10:44 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 10:48 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:49 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:47 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-26 16:16 -0800
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 19:46 -0500
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-27 11:20 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:28 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:25 -0600
Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-25 15:24 -0600
Page 24 of 28 — ← Prev page 1 … 22 23 [24] 25 26 … 28 Next page →
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-16 18:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <r4d1mj5itqsg09ukdkmm6p1ec6otc4gfoe@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #145283 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>> [JWC's desktop PC is] limitlessly expandable. That's what the bragging rights derive >>>> from. >>> >>> My MacBook Air is "limitlessly expandable" to, Sunshine. >>> >>> <https://www.sonnettech.com/product/thunderbolt/pcie-card-expansion-systems.html> >> >> Sounds easy to travel with. > >We were discussing expandability, sunshine. > >In the context of portability, I could take the computer and leave the >PCIe expansion chassis behind. OK, but it doesn't really make your laptop special. >>>>>> If I had spent a comparable amount on a comparable OEM PC, it'd not be >>>>>> nearly as good. That's undeniable. >>>>> >>>>> Did you buy a personal computer to get things done... >>>>> >>>>> ...or to brag about how "l337" you are? >>>> >>>> Both. >>> And that says EVERYTHING about you. >>> >>> Given your stated use cases, there is nothing that a Mac Mini couldn't >>> have done as well (or better) than what you spent more money (and time!) >>> to end up with. >> >> But it'd run macOS, so ... >Which does literally everything you say you do on Linux. Any modern computer does. But Linux does it with elegance. Winblows is a behemoth, and macOS is quirky. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-17 10:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vjsfck$1rknv$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #145294 |
On 2024-12-16 15:18, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>> [JWC's desktop PC is] limitlessly expandable. That's what the bragging rights derive >>>>> from. >>>> >>>> My MacBook Air is "limitlessly expandable" to, Sunshine. >>>> >>>> <https://www.sonnettech.com/product/thunderbolt/pcie-card-expansion-systems.html> >>> >>> Sounds easy to travel with. >> >> We were discussing expandability, sunshine. >> >> In the context of portability, I could take the computer and leave the >> PCIe expansion chassis behind. > > > OK, but it doesn't really make your laptop special. I wasn't saying it to claim my laptop was special, snowflake. I'm claiming that your "expandability" argument is wrong. > > >>>>>>> If I had spent a comparable amount on a comparable OEM PC, it'd not be >>>>>>> nearly as good. That's undeniable. >>>>>> >>>>>> Did you buy a personal computer to get things done... >>>>>> >>>>>> ...or to brag about how "l337" you are? >>>>> >>>>> Both. >>>> And that says EVERYTHING about you. >>>> >>>> Given your stated use cases, there is nothing that a Mac Mini couldn't >>>> have done as well (or better) than what you spent more money (and time!) >>>> to end up with. >>> >>> But it'd run macOS, so ... >> Which does literally everything you say you do on Linux. > > > Any modern computer does. But Linux does it with elegance. Winblows > is a behemoth, and macOS is quirky. And yet you cannot articulate what supposedly makes it "quirky". What is a "quirk" of macOS? Give a SINGLE example.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-16 16:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vjq62t$1acb4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #145277 |
On 12/16/24 4:04 PM, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>> Newegg has prefab systems that aren't the name brand, that's what I'd >>>>> go for if I wanted an OEM, but you can bet anything it won't have a >>>>> motherboard like the one I bought as a part. >>>> >>>> How is yours materially better... >>>> >>>> ...I mean apart from "bragging rights"? >>> >>> It's limitlessly expandable. That's what the bragging rights derive >>> from. >> >> My MacBook Air is "limitlessly expandable" to, Sunshine. >> >> <https://www.sonnettech.com/product/thunderbolt/pcie-card-expansion-systems.html> > > > Sounds easy to travel with. Yes, it is far easier than to lug a desktop tower, along with its separate display, separate keyboard, & separate mouse. >>>>> [The Mac mini] runs Apple's goofy OS, in any event. >>>> >>>> About which you've never been able to articulate what is "goofy" about it. >>> >>> I don't like it. It's like a nasty food. And Win11 is like a serving >>> of food that's too large, but you are nevertheless expected to eat the >>> whole thing. >> >> "I don't like it" is not the same is "it's goofy", princess. >> >> You cannot articulate a single actual thing that makes a Mac "goofy" or >> "quirky". > > Finder in Snow Leopard was a piece of junk. I don't recall it being bad at all: it was speedier than its predecessor and used less resources. Of course, this complaint from Joel is from an OS introduced fifteen years ago (2009), so at the very least, he should be sure to compare it to its contemporary of Windows 7, not current OSs. >>>>> If I had spent a comparable amount on a comparable OEM PC, it'd not be >>>>> nearly as good. That's undeniable. >>>> >>>> Did you buy a personal computer to get things done... >>>> >>>> ...or to brag about how "l337" you are? >>> >>> Both. >> And that says EVERYTHING about you. >> >> Given your stated use cases, there is nothing that a Mac Mini couldn't >> have done as well (or better) than what you spent more money (and time!) >> to end up with. > > But it'd run macOS, so ... It ships with MacOS, but that's not the only OS choice for l33t braggarts. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-16 17:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nmb1mj5ptum3qp424ikk9uuvof4o6qqv20@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #145286 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >On 12/16/24 4:04 PM, Joel wrote: >> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> Newegg has prefab systems that aren't the name brand, that's what I'd >>>>>> go for if I wanted an OEM, but you can bet anything it won't have a >>>>>> motherboard like the one I bought as a part. >>>>> >>>>> How is yours materially better... >>>>> >>>>> ...I mean apart from "bragging rights"? >>>> >>>> It's limitlessly expandable. That's what the bragging rights derive >>>> from. >>> >>> My MacBook Air is "limitlessly expandable" to, Sunshine. >>> >>> <https://www.sonnettech.com/product/thunderbolt/pcie-card-expansion-systems.html> >> >> Sounds easy to travel with. > >Yes, it is far easier than to lug a desktop tower, along with its >separate display, separate keyboard, & separate mouse. Not the point. Alan is trying to conflate laptop "expandability" with a desktop machine. >>>>>> [The Mac mini] runs Apple's goofy OS, in any event. >>>>> >>>>> About which you've never been able to articulate what is "goofy" about it. >>>> >>>> I don't like it. It's like a nasty food. And Win11 is like a serving >>>> of food that's too large, but you are nevertheless expected to eat the >>>> whole thing. >>> >>> "I don't like it" is not the same is "it's goofy", princess. >>> >>> You cannot articulate a single actual thing that makes a Mac "goofy" or >>> "quirky". >> >> Finder in Snow Leopard was a piece of junk. > >I don't recall it being bad at all: it was speedier than its predecessor >and used less resources. Of course, this complaint from Joel is from an >OS introduced fifteen years ago (2009), so at the very least, he should >be sure to compare it to its contemporary of Windows 7, not current OSs. Win7's Windows Explorer was far better. >>>>>> If I had spent a comparable amount on a comparable OEM PC, it'd not be >>>>>> nearly as good. That's undeniable. >>>>> >>>>> Did you buy a personal computer to get things done... >>>>> >>>>> ...or to brag about how "l337" you are? >>>> >>>> Both. >>> And that says EVERYTHING about you. >>> >>> Given your stated use cases, there is nothing that a Mac Mini couldn't >>> have done as well (or better) than what you spent more money (and time!) >>> to end up with. >> >> But it'd run macOS, so ... > >It ships with MacOS, but that's not the only OS choice for l33t braggarts. Oh sure, buy an Apple device to run something else, that makes sense. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-16 19:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vjqhtu$1cfbo$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #145289 |
On 12/16/24 5:53 PM, Joel wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >> On 12/16/24 4:04 PM, Joel wrote: >>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> Newegg has prefab systems that aren't the name brand, that's what I'd >>>>>>> go for if I wanted an OEM, but you can bet anything it won't have a >>>>>>> motherboard like the one I bought as a part. >>>>>> >>>>>> How is yours materially better... >>>>>> >>>>>> ...I mean apart from "bragging rights"? >>>>> >>>>> It's limitlessly expandable. That's what the bragging rights derive >>>>> from. >>>> >>>> My MacBook Air is "limitlessly expandable" to, Sunshine. >>>> >>>> <https://www.sonnettech.com/product/thunderbolt/pcie-card-expansion-systems.html> >>> >>> Sounds easy to travel with. >> >> Yes, it is far easier than to lug a desktop tower, along with its >> separate display, separate keyboard, & separate mouse. > > > Not the point. Alan is trying to conflate laptop "expandability" with > a desktop machine. Well, Alan is correct. You're just complaining that the expandability wasn't in precisely the form that you prefer, but that doesn't change the fact that his laptop example is in fact, quite expandable. >>>>>>> [The Mac mini] runs Apple's goofy OS, in any event. >>>>>> >>>>>> About which you've never been able to articulate what is "goofy" about it. >>>>> >>>>> I don't like it. It's like a nasty food. And Win11 is like a serving >>>>> of food that's too large, but you are nevertheless expected to eat the >>>>> whole thing. >>>> >>>> "I don't like it" is not the same is "it's goofy", princess. >>>> >>>> You cannot articulate a single actual thing that makes a Mac "goofy" or >>>> "quirky". >>> >>> Finder in Snow Leopard was a piece of junk. >> >> I don't recall it being bad at all: it was speedier than its predecessor >> and used less resources. Of course, this complaint from Joel is from an >> OS introduced fifteen years ago (2009), so at the very least, he should >> be sure to compare it to its contemporary of Windows 7, not current OSs. > > > Win7's Windows Explorer was far better. Windows Internet Explorer was an App, not an OS. And IE7 was such a 'great' product that MS lost their marketshare lead to Firefox in 2009. >>>>>>> If I had spent a comparable amount on a comparable OEM PC, it'd not be >>>>>>> nearly as good. That's undeniable. >>>>>> >>>>>> Did you buy a personal computer to get things done... >>>>>> >>>>>> ...or to brag about how "l337" you are? >>>>> >>>>> Both. >>>> And that says EVERYTHING about you. >>>> >>>> Given your stated use cases, there is nothing that a Mac Mini couldn't >>>> have done as well (or better) than what you spent more money (and time!) >>>> to end up with. >>> >>> But it'd run macOS, so ... >> >> It ships with MacOS, but that's not the only OS choice for l33t braggarts. > > > Oh sure, buy an Apple device to run something else, that makes sense. Its noting on the hardware, plus details like the default OS not being used is simply bigger bragging rights for the l33t geeks & wannabees. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-17 10:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ul63mjt2p6ct8krek7dm8q6v9gslked3r2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #145298 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>>> Finder in Snow Leopard was a piece of junk. >>> >>> I don't recall it being bad at all: it was speedier than its predecessor >>> and used less resources. Of course, this complaint from Joel is from an >>> OS introduced fifteen years ago (2009), so at the very least, he should >>> be sure to compare it to its contemporary of Windows 7, not current OSs. >> >> Win7's Windows Explorer was far better. > >Windows Internet Explorer was an App, not an OS. And IE7 was such a >'great' product that MS lost their marketshare lead to Firefox in 2009. I'm talking about what is now called File Explorer, explorer.exe, not IE the Web browser. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-17 10:29 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vjsfu9$1rknv$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #145298 |
On 2024-12-16 16:51, -hh wrote: >> >> Win7's Windows Explorer was far better. > > Windows Internet Explorer was an App, not an OS. And IE7 was such a > 'great' product that MS lost their marketshare lead to Firefox in 2009. To be fair, I'm certain he meant "File Explorer"... ...which of course Microsoft make ambiguous because of their propensity for using the same word for different purposes, over and over and over.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-17 10:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vjsf9s$1rknv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #145289 |
On 2024-12-16 14:53, Joel wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >> On 12/16/24 4:04 PM, Joel wrote: >>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> Newegg has prefab systems that aren't the name brand, that's what I'd >>>>>>> go for if I wanted an OEM, but you can bet anything it won't have a >>>>>>> motherboard like the one I bought as a part. >>>>>> >>>>>> How is yours materially better... >>>>>> >>>>>> ...I mean apart from "bragging rights"? >>>>> >>>>> It's limitlessly expandable. That's what the bragging rights derive >>>>> from. >>>> >>>> My MacBook Air is "limitlessly expandable" to, Sunshine. >>>> >>>> <https://www.sonnettech.com/product/thunderbolt/pcie-card-expansion-systems.html> >>> >>> Sounds easy to travel with. >> >> Yes, it is far easier than to lug a desktop tower, along with its >> separate display, separate keyboard, & separate mouse. > > > Not the point. Alan is trying to conflate laptop "expandability" with > a desktop machine. I'm pointing out that your claims of lack of expandability in machines such as the Mac Mini are specious. It may not be the ordinary FORM in which you are used to seeing it, but Macs are expandable. > > >>>>>>> [The Mac mini] runs Apple's goofy OS, in any event. >>>>>> >>>>>> About which you've never been able to articulate what is "goofy" about it. >>>>> >>>>> I don't like it. It's like a nasty food. And Win11 is like a serving >>>>> of food that's too large, but you are nevertheless expected to eat the >>>>> whole thing. >>>> >>>> "I don't like it" is not the same is "it's goofy", princess. >>>> >>>> You cannot articulate a single actual thing that makes a Mac "goofy" or >>>> "quirky". >>> >>> Finder in Snow Leopard was a piece of junk. >> >> I don't recall it being bad at all: it was speedier than its predecessor >> and used less resources. Of course, this complaint from Joel is from an >> OS introduced fifteen years ago (2009), so at the very least, he should >> be sure to compare it to its contemporary of Windows 7, not current OSs. > > > Win7's Windows Explorer was far better. IN WHAT SPECIFIC WAY?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-17 13:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1cg3mj13bn11rltmjeacncpk79kb9i1f5m@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #145327 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >On 2024-12-16 14:53, Joel wrote: >> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>> On 12/16/24 4:04 PM, Joel wrote: >>>> >>>> Finder in Snow Leopard was a piece of junk. >>> >>> I don't recall it being bad at all: it was speedier than its predecessor >>> and used less resources. Of course, this complaint from Joel is from an >>> OS introduced fifteen years ago (2009), so at the very least, he should >>> be sure to compare it to its contemporary of Windows 7, not current OSs. >> >> Win7's Windows Explorer was far better. > >IN > >WHAT > >SPECIFIC > >WAY? Context menus, etc. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-17 10:31 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vjsg2m$1rknu$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #145330 |
On 2024-12-17 10:23, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >> On 2024-12-16 14:53, Joel wrote: >>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/16/24 4:04 PM, Joel wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Finder in Snow Leopard was a piece of junk. >>>> >>>> I don't recall it being bad at all: it was speedier than its predecessor >>>> and used less resources. Of course, this complaint from Joel is from an >>>> OS introduced fifteen years ago (2009), so at the very least, he should >>>> be sure to compare it to its contemporary of Windows 7, not current OSs. >>> >>> Win7's Windows Explorer was far better. >> >> IN >> >> WHAT >> >> SPECIFIC >> >> WAY? > > > Context menus, etc. We've debunked that one. The Finder had context menus. Try again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-25 13:20 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vkhok5$2hgi2$33@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #145330 |
"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1cg3mj13bn11rltmjeacncpk79kb9i1f5m@4ax.com... > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>On 2024-12-16 14:53, Joel wrote: >>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>>> On 12/16/24 4:04 PM, Joel wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Finder in Snow Leopard was a piece of junk. >>>> >>>> I don't recall it being bad at all: it was speedier than its >>>> predecessor >>>> and used less resources. Of course, this complaint from Joel is from >>>> an >>>> OS introduced fifteen years ago (2009), so at the very least, he should >>>> be sure to compare it to its contemporary of Windows 7, not current >>>> OSs. >>> >>> Win7's Windows Explorer was far better. >> >>IN >> >>WHAT >> >>SPECIFIC >> >>WAY? > > > Context menus, etc. > > -- > Joel W. Crump Keep in mind that Joel is forever complaining about how I remain with Win7... and investment I continue to reap benefits thought from not having to pay for new licenses and being able to take advantage of existing software for which I have business or unlimited licenses, meaning I can install software I've paid for once on as many machines as I want/need to. and which is compatible with the file format still being used by current MS products.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-25 13:15 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vkhoj6$2hgi2$32@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #145289 |
"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message news:nmb1mj5ptum3qp424ikk9uuvof4o6qqv20@4ax.com... > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>On 12/16/24 4:04 PM, Joel wrote: >>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> Newegg has prefab systems that aren't the name brand, that's what >>>>>>> I'd >>>>>>> go for if I wanted an OEM, but you can bet anything it won't have a >>>>>>> motherboard like the one I bought as a part. >>>>>> >>>>>> How is yours materially better... >>>>>> >>>>>> ...I mean apart from "bragging rights"? >>>>> >>>>> It's limitlessly expandable. That's what the bragging rights derive >>>>> from. >>>> >>>> My MacBook Air is "limitlessly expandable" to, Sunshine. >>>> >>>> <https://www.sonnettech.com/product/thunderbolt/pcie-card-expansion-systems.html> >>> >>> Sounds easy to travel with. >> >>Yes, it is far easier than to lug a desktop tower, along with its >>separate display, separate keyboard, & separate mouse. > > > Not the point. Sorry, you have already stated for the record those are valid points.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-25 13:14 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vkhoi7$2hgi2$31@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #145264 |
"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message news:f821mjlrjps24e8icmllhme2398on0je1s@4ax.com... > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>On 2024-12-15 14:01, Joel wrote: >>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>> >>> Newegg has prefab systems that aren't the name brand, that's what I'd >>> go for if I wanted an OEM, but you can bet anything it won't have a >>> motherboard like the one I bought as a part. >> >>How is yours materially better... >> >>...I mean apart from "bragging rights"? > > > It's limitlessly expandable. Except for adding another hard drive.. right? > That's what the bragging rights derive > from. Must suck then that you've admitted to having ZERO expandability when it comes to hard drives. Hmmmm.. Wouldn't that be called "a limit"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-16 11:40 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vjpvn4$18qqi$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #145219 |
On 2024-12-15 12:48, Joel wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >> On 12/15/24 12:24 PM, Alan wrote: >>> On 2024-12-15 02:56, Joel wrote: >>>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> People who value things differently than you do are not automatically >>>>> stupid. >>>>> >>>>> I realize that concept is a little too advanced for your adolescent >>>>> thinking, but it's still true. >>>> >>>> It's not adolescent thinking, it's simple math. And I'm not calling >>>> you "stupid", I'm pointing out that you can always do far better than >>>> Apple, on value, if you build [a computer] yourself. >>> >>> And if you don't value you your own time. >>> >>> Yu're conflating "value" with "monetary cost" alone. >> >> Ah, its the lame old classic bit of "my labor is always frrrrreee!". >> >> Well, as I've said before: prove that your labor is worth so little to >> you by coming over and mowing my lawn. >> >> Of course, at this time of year, their task will be raking up leaves .. >> or if it snows later, to get out there in the cold and shovel: I'm >> flexible for what menial labor task they'll prove themselves with <g>. > > > Labor and the time it takes is just part of getting a good PC, you > have to buy it as parts, you have to design it. You could pay a > fortune for some other person to do the work for you, but it's not > worth it, you'd be better off in that case with a decent prefab > machine. But what do you do with IKEA furniture? Do you pay someone > to assemble it, or do you just bite the bullet and take the time? It's > not so different with a PC, it's something you'll get a lot of use out > of. I've already had mine for 2 1/2 years, and it's like new. Worth > every minute I put in, assembling it. > But you don't pay "a fortune", Joel. You pay a small premium. And your computer is "like new"... ...after you've added a video card to address a failing in your research when designing your system... ...and replacing the OS with Linux because your system was so poorly spec'ed it couldn't keep running Windows well.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-16 15:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2321mjdq1ft7m6jjeg7kts836oegoiruve@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #145256 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >> Labor and the time it takes [assembling computer hardware] is just part of getting a good PC, you >> have to buy it as parts, you have to design it. You could pay a >> fortune for some other person to do the work for you, but it's not >> worth it, you'd be better off in that case with a decent prefab >> machine. But what do you do with IKEA furniture? Do you pay someone >> to assemble it, or do you just bite the bullet and take the time? It's >> not so different with a PC, it's something you'll get a lot of use out >> of. I've already had mine for 2 1/2 years, and it's like new. Worth >> every minute I put in, assembling it. > >But you don't pay "a fortune", Joel. > >You pay a small premium. > >And your computer is "like new"... > >...after you've added a video card to address a failing in your research >when designing your system... > >...and replacing the OS with Linux because your system was so poorly >spec'ed it couldn't keep running Windows well. That's ridiculous. It's normal to add parts as needed, and replace bloating M$-crapware OSes with Linux. Why are you harping on it? -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-16 12:29 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vjq2ja$18qqj$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #145263 |
On 2024-12-16 12:08, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>> Labor and the time it takes [assembling computer hardware] is just part of getting a good PC, you >>> have to buy it as parts, you have to design it. You could pay a >>> fortune for some other person to do the work for you, but it's not >>> worth it, you'd be better off in that case with a decent prefab >>> machine. But what do you do with IKEA furniture? Do you pay someone >>> to assemble it, or do you just bite the bullet and take the time? It's >>> not so different with a PC, it's something you'll get a lot of use out >>> of. I've already had mine for 2 1/2 years, and it's like new. Worth >>> every minute I put in, assembling it. >> >> But you don't pay "a fortune", Joel. >> >> You pay a small premium. >> >> And your computer is "like new"... >> >> ...after you've added a video card to address a failing in your research >> when designing your system... >> >> ...and replacing the OS with Linux because your system was so poorly >> spec'ed it couldn't keep running Windows well. > > > That's ridiculous. It's normal to add parts as needed, and replace > bloating M$-crapware OSes with Linux. Why are you harping on it? > Because you're trying to convince us your design skills are so "elite", doofus. In the space of just 30 months you: had to add a video card because you didn't realize that you might end up with a 4K monitor (and you couldn't make a 4K monitor work on a GPU that is supposed to support one); had to abandon a $200 investment in Windows, because you either couldn't spec a system that would keep up with upgrades to Windows or you couldn't figure out why your system was slowing down.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-16 16:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1551mjlgd0a9pmmf61o4phbvcl0l3n8ao0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #145270 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>> Labor and the time it takes [assembling computer hardware] is just part of getting a good PC, you >>>> have to buy it as parts, you have to design it. You could pay a >>>> fortune for some other person to do the work for you, but it's not >>>> worth it, you'd be better off in that case with a decent prefab >>>> machine. But what do you do with IKEA furniture? Do you pay someone >>>> to assemble it, or do you just bite the bullet and take the time? It's >>>> not so different with a PC, it's something you'll get a lot of use out >>>> of. I've already had mine for 2 1/2 years, and it's like new. Worth >>>> every minute I put in, assembling it. >>> >>> But you don't pay "a fortune", Joel. >>> >>> You pay a small premium. >>> >>> And your computer is "like new"... >>> >>> ...after you've added a video card to address a failing in your research >>> when designing your system... >>> >>> ...and replacing the OS with Linux because your system was so poorly >>> spec'ed it couldn't keep running Windows well. >> >> That's ridiculous. It's normal to add parts as needed, and replace >> bloating M$-crapware OSes with Linux. Why are you harping on it? > >Because you're trying to convince us your design skills are so "elite", >doofus. > >In the space of just 30 months you: > >had to add a video card because you didn't realize that you might end up >with a 4K monitor (and you couldn't make a 4K monitor work on a GPU that >is supposed to support one); > >had to abandon a $200 investment in Windows, because you either couldn't >spec a system that would keep up with upgrades to Windows or you >couldn't figure out why your system was slowing down. How is any of that true? The 4K monitor worked with the Intel video, just not well enough, adding the video card is a minor concern, I always intended that if there were a need for one I'd be able to do so. The investment in Windows is nothing to me, I got a lot of use out of it in 2 1/2 years, until Linux better supported my fresh hardware. Big fucking deal. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-16 13:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vjq66j$1ads2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #145276 |
On 2024-12-16 13:01, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>> Labor and the time it takes [assembling computer hardware] is just part of getting a good PC, you >>>>> have to buy it as parts, you have to design it. You could pay a >>>>> fortune for some other person to do the work for you, but it's not >>>>> worth it, you'd be better off in that case with a decent prefab >>>>> machine. But what do you do with IKEA furniture? Do you pay someone >>>>> to assemble it, or do you just bite the bullet and take the time? It's >>>>> not so different with a PC, it's something you'll get a lot of use out >>>>> of. I've already had mine for 2 1/2 years, and it's like new. Worth >>>>> every minute I put in, assembling it. >>>> >>>> But you don't pay "a fortune", Joel. >>>> >>>> You pay a small premium. >>>> >>>> And your computer is "like new"... >>>> >>>> ...after you've added a video card to address a failing in your research >>>> when designing your system... >>>> >>>> ...and replacing the OS with Linux because your system was so poorly >>>> spec'ed it couldn't keep running Windows well. >>> >>> That's ridiculous. It's normal to add parts as needed, and replace >>> bloating M$-crapware OSes with Linux. Why are you harping on it? >> >> Because you're trying to convince us your design skills are so "elite", >> doofus. >> >> In the space of just 30 months you: >> >> had to add a video card because you didn't realize that you might end up >> with a 4K monitor (and you couldn't make a 4K monitor work on a GPU that >> is supposed to support one); >> >> had to abandon a $200 investment in Windows, because you either couldn't >> spec a system that would keep up with upgrades to Windows or you >> couldn't figure out why your system was slowing down. > > > How is any of that true? The 4K monitor worked with the Intel video, > just not well enough, adding the video card is a minor concern, I > always intended that if there were a need for one I'd be able to do > so. The investment in Windows is nothing to me, I got a lot of use > out of it in 2 1/2 years, until Linux better supported my fresh > hardware. Big fucking deal. > You bought Windows, because (presumably) you thought it was the better choice... ...but then you spec'ed hardware that wasn't able to run it for more than 2.5 years. And if "investment in Windows is nothing to [you]", then why do you make such a big deal out of paying less for your system than an equivalent Mac (which you didn't; a Mac Mini would have done what you're doing and cost you even less). And if a monitor isn't working "well enough" and you have to spend additional dollars to correct it, then you didn't do a very good job of designing your system in the first place. You spent additional time on installing the new GPU. You spent additional time on installing and configuring Linux. Those are costs over and above what you'd have paid if you'd made your design choices better in the first place.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-16 18:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dfd1mjhkfrqone1m69hc4thp56un7r122u@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #145287 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>> It's normal to add parts as needed, and replace >>>> bloating M$-crapware OSes with Linux. Why are you harping on it? >>> >>> Because you're trying to convince us your design skills are so "elite", >>> doofus. >>> >>> In the space of just 30 months you: >>> >>> had to add a video card because you didn't realize that you might end up >>> with a 4K monitor (and you couldn't make a 4K monitor work on a GPU that >>> is supposed to support one); >>> >>> had to abandon a $200 investment in Windows, because you either couldn't >>> spec a system that would keep up with upgrades to Windows or you >>> couldn't figure out why your system was slowing down. >> >> How is any of that true? The 4K monitor worked with the Intel video, >> just not well enough, adding the video card is a minor concern, I >> always intended that if there were a need for one I'd be able to do >> so. The investment in Windows is nothing to me, I got a lot of use >> out of it in 2 1/2 years, until Linux better supported my fresh >> hardware. Big fucking deal. > >You bought Windows, because (presumably) you thought it was the better >choice... > >...but then you spec'ed hardware that wasn't able to run it for more >than 2.5 years. "Able to", it was, acceptably *to me*, not. >And if "investment in Windows is nothing to [you]", then why do you make >such a big deal out of paying less for your system than an equivalent >Mac (which you didn't; a Mac Mini would have done what you're doing and >cost you even less). Would the mini have 32 GB RAM and 1 TB SSD, pray tell, genius? >And if a monitor isn't working "well enough" and you have to spend >additional dollars to correct it, then you didn't do a very good job of >designing your system in the first place. It worked as a monitor, Win11 and Intel's video failed to handle it well. >You spent additional time on installing the new GPU. > >You spent additional time on installing and configuring Linux. > >Those are costs over and above what you'd have paid if you'd made your >design choices better in the first place. And I'd rather spend that time than deal with Apple BS. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-16 21:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vjqmkf$1ci8h$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #145297 |
On 12/16/24 6:24 PM, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>> It's normal to add parts as needed, and replace >>>>> bloating M$-crapware OSes with Linux. Why are you harping on it? >>>> >>>> Because you're trying to convince us your design skills are so "elite", >>>> doofus. >>>> >>>> In the space of just 30 months you: >>>> >>>> had to add a video card because you didn't realize that you might end up >>>> with a 4K monitor (and you couldn't make a 4K monitor work on a GPU that >>>> is supposed to support one); >>>> >>>> had to abandon a $200 investment in Windows, because you either couldn't >>>> spec a system that would keep up with upgrades to Windows or you >>>> couldn't figure out why your system was slowing down. >>> >>> How is any of that true? The 4K monitor worked with the Intel video, >>> just not well enough, adding the video card is a minor concern, I >>> always intended that if there were a need for one I'd be able to do >>> so. The investment in Windows is nothing to me, I got a lot of use >>> out of it in 2 1/2 years, until Linux better supported my fresh >>> hardware. Big fucking deal. >> >> You bought Windows, because (presumably) you thought it was the better >> choice... >> >> ...but then you spec'ed hardware that wasn't able to run it for more >> than 2.5 years. > > "Able to", it was, acceptably *to me*, not. Big talk from a guy who thinks that an i5 CPU is "high end"! /s >> And if "investment in Windows is nothing to [you]", then why do you make >> such a big deal out of paying less for your system than an equivalent >> Mac (which you didn't; a Mac Mini would have done what you're doing and >> cost you even less). > > Would the mini have 32 GB RAM and 1 TB SSD, pray tell, genius? But you've already admitted that you have headroom that you're not using with 32GB/1TB, despite how x86 is known to be RAM inefficient. So if one really is researching & buying based on needs instead of lame l33t posturing, then you'd know that the M architectural fit for your needs is more like 8GB/512GB. Doing so puts the MSRP at $999: $150 less than what you spent instead of $650 more for stuff you don't need. >> And if a monitor isn't working "well enough" and you have to spend >> additional dollars to correct it, then you didn't do a very good job of >> designing your system in the first place. > > It worked as a monitor, Win11 and Intel's video failed to handle it > well. By 2020, there was really no excuse to not buy a system that didn't offer 'good' 4K support. >> You spent additional time on installing the new GPU. >> >> You spent additional time on installing and configuring Linux. >> >> Those are costs over and above what you'd have paid if you'd made your >> design choices better in the first place. > > And I'd rather spend that time than deal with Apple BS. Because installing Linux once on new HW is a lot of work...check! <g> -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 24 of 28 — ← Prev page 1 … 22 23 [24] 25 26 … 28 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web