Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.misc
Subject	Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1
Date	5 Apr 2019 16:35:39 GMT
Organization	Piglet's Pickles & Preserves
Lines	20
Message-ID	<ggpeerFeu2pU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<f0b0nf-e25.ln1@rasp.therandymon.com> <87ftqxvjnr.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <q85e5l$rm5$2@dont-email.me> <ggnagaFt1fU1@mid.individual.net> <q862fi$f6s$1@panix2.panix.com> <ggofeiF87l2U2@mid.individual.net> <ggog28Ff419U3@mid.individual.net>
Reply-To	usenet@huge.org.uk
X-Trace	individual.net YKZSQGaKqx8vnIxpaUu77gOiXvTsvewRrWiN8f0KUx227KiKHF
Cancel-Lock	sha1:iK83400lLA6PZK990nPQLFSv/h8=
X-No-Archive	Yes
X-Clacks-Overhead	GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent	slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Xref	csiph.com comp.misc:17766

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2019-04-05, Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> wrote:

[snippage]

> I use the command line on UNIX most of the time, and have since 1975. But 
> I still find a file browser helpful when trying to sort out a load of 
> files I've forgotten about. I also like a graphical mail client (and a 
> graphical NNTP client). Of course, if I get stuck at the command line 
> there's always xdg-open.

Like (I suspect) many (most?) Unix users, I use the most appropriate
tool for the job, GUI or CLI. With a "desktop enviroment", I have the
choice. I presently have 5 GUI tools running and 4 CLI's on 4 desktops.

-- 
Today is Setting Orange, the 22nd day of Discord in the YOLD 3185
1. What power do you have?  2. Where did you get it?  3. In whose
interests do you exercise it?  4. To whom are you accountable?  5. How
                  can we get rid of you?

Thread

Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 RS Wood  <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2019-03-28 22:03 -0400
  Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Oregonian Haruspex <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-03-29 06:36 +0000
  Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net> - 2019-04-04 16:07 +0000
    Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-04-04 17:16 +0000
      Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-04 21:15 +0000
        Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2019-04-04 19:03 -0400
          Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-05 07:46 +0000
            Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-04-05 07:56 +0000
              Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-05 16:35 +0000
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2019-04-06 02:49 -0300
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-06 09:07 +0000
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2019-04-06 07:48 -0400
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-04-06 11:56 +0000
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2019-04-06 09:44 -0400
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-04-06 13:53 +0000
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-04-06 13:35 +0000
          Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-04-05 13:35 +0000
            Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-04-05 13:38 +0000
              Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-05 16:36 +0000
    Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2019-04-05 12:25 +0300
    Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Steve555 <Steve555@reallybogus.nodomain.nowhere.invalid> - 2019-06-17 21:39 +0000
      Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-06-18 00:22 +0000
      Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2019-06-19 06:46 +0000

csiph-web