Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.misc > #4863

Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm

From Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere>
Newsgroups comp.misc
Subject Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm
Date 2014-09-13 01:16 -0300
Organization Bridgewater Institute for Advanced Study - Blacksmith Shop
Message-ID <8738bw6tp4.fsf@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <lussg3$t0k$2@dont-email.me> <alpine.LNX.2.02.1409111608250.20172@darkstar.example.org> <lut854$iml$2@dont-email.me> <87oauk7i8v.fsf@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> <alpine.LNX.2.02.1409121702010.22248@darkstar.example.org>

Show all headers | View raw


Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> writes:

> But in more recent times, I've hit pages that seem to reject lynx at the 
> server software level, all those 406 errors.  I don't remember seeing them 
> until that certain point, and I know with some sites I've tried lynx with 
> different names in the user agent header (even gibberish) and didn't get 
> the error.  That's discrimination.

Yeah, you can set the useragent string from the command line.  Just
tried it on localhost with useragent "Fluffy". :-)  My usual browser
(js and images off) tells sites that it's "Walled-city", a nod to
Gibson's Idoru.

Some sites send js that your browser has to react to in some way
before they'll talk to you.  And the NYT puts you through a series of
"303 See Other" and "302 Found" replies before they'll give you
content. I dunno if Lynx handles that or not.

-- 
Mike Spencer                  Nova Scotia, Canada

Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-09 10:34 +0000
  Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Rob <monst.oorzudo@ntlworld.com> - 2014-09-09 20:04 +0100
    Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2014-09-09 15:34 -0400
      Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Rob <monst.oorzudo@ntlworld.com> - 2014-09-16 21:09 +0100
  Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-09-09 19:27 +0000
  Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm +++ATH0 <usenet.20.sdr@spamgourmet.com> - 2014-09-09 19:39 +0000
    Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-09-09 16:09 -0400
      Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-09-10 18:12 +0000
        Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-10 18:40 +0000
          Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-09-11 11:25 +0000
            Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-11 16:21 +0000
        Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2014-09-11 19:17 +0000
          Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-09-11 16:09 -0400
            Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-11 22:30 +0000
              Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-09-12 11:23 +0000
            Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-11 22:36 +0000
              Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-09-12 11:49 +0000
              Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2014-09-12 16:26 -0300
                Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-09-12 17:07 -0400
                Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2014-09-13 01:16 -0300
  Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Chris J Dixon <chris@cdixon.me.uk> - 2014-09-10 08:02 +0100
    Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-09-10 09:53 +0200
      Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-10 09:44 +0000
      Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Adrian <bulleid@ku.gro.lioff> - 2014-09-10 19:59 +0100
        Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-09-10 19:15 +0000
    Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-10 09:40 +0000
      Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2014-09-10 17:09 +0100
  Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-09-10 10:05 +0200

csiph-web