Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm |
| Date | 2014-09-10 19:15 +0000 |
| Organization | Piglet's Pickles & Preserves |
| Message-ID | <c7bm9uFf9i3U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <oRJ56CKGc22vZVFU0jsf+FfO@dont-email.me> <kntv0albrjq5fdqrvsbpfhj49lkq6ogrml@4ax.com> <vkc5eb-i9a.ln1@news.chingola.ch> <jaDBEFCN+JEUFwfR@ku.gro.lloiff> |
On 2014-09-10, Adrian <bulleid@ku.gro.lioff> wrote: > In message <vkc5eb-i9a.ln1@news.chingola.ch>, Paul Sture ><nospam@sture.ch> writes >>The other thing was the timing and length of the adverts. I believe that >>this was (still is?) 12 minutes per hour for the UK, but they manipulate >>the schedules so that you probably watch 16 minutes of ads if sitting down >>to watch a 1 hour programme. >> > > I think that has been dropped, and it is now more flexible. If you > watch stuff in the middle of the night, you can go for a couple of hours > without an advert, whereas during the more popular hours, you can't. I > suspect that over a 24 hour period it is fixed (it might be 12 x 24 to > use your figures above). The non-mainstream digital channels are worse, > some of those I've timed at having 5 minute breaks. What used to be a > 50 minute programme is now nearer 75 minutes. I worked for a TV company any years ago (working on an advertising air time sales system written in MUMPS & a "talent" payment system written in RPG2). At the time, IIRC the companies were allowed to show 12 minutes an hour of advertising, and they were allowed to "borrow" a minute from an adjacent hour, IOW, you could have 11, 14, 11 minutes around the 9 o'clock peak hour. As for the wee small hours, it was simply the case that no-one wanted to buy the air-time, so there were simply no adverts.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-09 10:34 +0000
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Rob <monst.oorzudo@ntlworld.com> - 2014-09-09 20:04 +0100
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2014-09-09 15:34 -0400
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Rob <monst.oorzudo@ntlworld.com> - 2014-09-16 21:09 +0100
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-09-09 19:27 +0000
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm +++ATH0 <usenet.20.sdr@spamgourmet.com> - 2014-09-09 19:39 +0000
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-09-09 16:09 -0400
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-09-10 18:12 +0000
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-10 18:40 +0000
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-09-11 11:25 +0000
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-11 16:21 +0000
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2014-09-11 19:17 +0000
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-09-11 16:09 -0400
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-11 22:30 +0000
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-09-12 11:23 +0000
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-11 22:36 +0000
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-09-12 11:49 +0000
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2014-09-12 16:26 -0300
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-09-12 17:07 -0400
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2014-09-13 01:16 -0300
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Chris J Dixon <chris@cdixon.me.uk> - 2014-09-10 08:02 +0100
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-09-10 09:53 +0200
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-10 09:44 +0000
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Adrian <bulleid@ku.gro.lioff> - 2014-09-10 19:59 +0100
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-09-10 19:15 +0000
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-10 09:40 +0000
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2014-09-10 17:09 +0100
Re: Blocking web ads is 'as bad as Napster', says data firm Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-09-10 10:05 +0200
csiph-web