Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #81960

RE: ORM opinion

From "Joseph L. Casale" <jcasale@activenetwerx.com>
Subject RE: ORM opinion
Date 2014-12-04 23:43 +0000
References <CAPTjJmrix4KtLwf4S6kDHYsNLGT5KdYxhrju-0rS8GOyJGa9CQ@mail.gmail.com> <1417735208769.37132@activenetwerx.com>,<m5qquh$1r4$1@ger.gmane.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.16597.1417736640.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


> Anything listed here http://www.pythoncentral.io/sqlalchemy-vs-orms/
> you've not heard about?  I found peewee easy to use although I've
> clearly no idea if it suits your needs.  There's only one way to find out :)

Hi Mark,
I found that article before posting and some of the guys here have already
started using peewee. I don't have much time with it yet. So far all I can say
is its unfortunate some package authors take such an approach to naming.

I can't fathom sitting across the table from a CTO and CFO who are authorizing
a 7 figure expenditure and then telling them about my peewee app with its
playhouse module? Sigh...

That aside, compared to all the rest it seems to fit the requirements.

jlc

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

RE: ORM opinion "Joseph L. Casale" <jcasale@activenetwerx.com> - 2014-12-04 23:43 +0000

csiph-web