Groups > comp.lang.python > #81959

Re: ORM opinion

References	<1417716864073.82294@activenetwerx.com> <CAPTjJmrix4KtLwf4S6kDHYsNLGT5KdYxhrju-0rS8GOyJGa9CQ@mail.gmail.com> <1417735208769.37132@activenetwerx.com>
Date	2014-12-05 10:38 +1100
Subject	Re: ORM opinion
From	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.16596.1417736298.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Joseph L. Casale
<jcasale@activenetwerx.com> wrote:
> I am stuck with the current architecture, but the idea you propose has
> been thrown around, truth is I am not certain if we are enduring the
> effort of such a large rewrite that Python is the tool to use (this is a
> Windows application) but regardless your idea is one that is proposed.

Windows? Then even more important to minimize the number of processes
you create. They're very costly on Windows.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: ORM opinion Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-12-05 10:38 +1100

csiph-web