Groups > comp.lang.python > #81961

Re: ORM opinion

References	<1417716864073.82294@activenetwerx.com> <CAPTjJmrix4KtLwf4S6kDHYsNLGT5KdYxhrju-0rS8GOyJGa9CQ@mail.gmail.com> <1417735208769.37132@activenetwerx.com> <m5qquh$1r4$1@ger.gmane.org> <1417736628226.14287@activenetwerx.com>
Date	2014-12-05 10:47 +1100
Subject	Re: ORM opinion
From	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.16598.1417736856.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Joseph L. Casale
<jcasale@activenetwerx.com> wrote:
> I found that article before posting and some of the guys here have already
> started using peewee. I don't have much time with it yet. So far all I can say
> is its unfortunate some package authors take such an approach to naming.
>
> I can't fathom sitting across the table from a CTO and CFO who are authorizing
> a 7 figure expenditure and then telling them about my peewee app with its
> playhouse module? Sigh...

Then never EVER get into Ruby. That seems to be the norm for gem naming.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: ORM opinion Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-12-05 10:47 +1100

csiph-web