Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #81960 > unrolled thread

RE: ORM opinion

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  RE: ORM opinion "Joseph L. Casale" <jcasale@activenetwerx.com> - 2014-12-04 23:43 +0000

#81960 — RE: ORM opinion

> Anything listed here http://www.pythoncentral.io/sqlalchemy-vs-orms/
> you've not heard about?  I found peewee easy to use although I've
> clearly no idea if it suits your needs.  There's only one way to find out :)

Hi Mark,
I found that article before posting and some of the guys here have already
started using peewee. I don't have much time with it yet. So far all I can say
is its unfortunate some package authors take such an approach to naming.

I can't fathom sitting across the table from a CTO and CFO who are authorizing
a 7 figure expenditure and then telling them about my peewee app with its
playhouse module? Sigh...

That aside, compared to all the rest it seems to fit the requirements.

jlc

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web