Re: Sequential JPGs?

Path	csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Dr J R Stockton <reply1232@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Subject	Re: Sequential JPGs?
Date	Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:37:05 +0100
Organization	Home
Lines	49
Message-ID	<qSSFdqDR7AIQFwea@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid> (permalink)
References	<TbCdncZaMuiorY_NnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@posted.localnet> <XnsA09D5BC07E46eejj99@194.109.133.133> <pfadnV4pd9kRwY7NnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d@posted.localnet> <XnsA09E5F61FA229eejj99@194.109.133.133> <4$$RGBTSjZFQFwnm@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid> <ou2dnTqTSrmUb4DNnZ2dnUVZ_hadnZ2d@posted.localnet>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain;charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info	mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="530603207bb5dc63eadbc45c88da0024"; logging-data="7104"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+7KaT7W4Hq4elKZh1n2ELT/I3Xrdtgvac="
User-Agent	Turnpike/6.05-S (<hl3Exlkgcs8anA9uKu7bCnIZDr>)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:7xFTOVYb4m8TfvXyLYLo1UttQ2g=
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:15288

Show key headers only | View raw

In comp.lang.javascript message <ou2dnTqTSrmUb4DNnZ2dnUVZ_hadnZ2d@posted
.localnet>, Sat, 4 Aug 2012 21:09:42, Robert Baer
<robertbaer@localnet.com> posted:

>Dr J R Stockton wrote:
>> In comp.lang.javascript message<XnsA09E5F61FA229eejj99@194.109.133.133>
>> , Sat, 28 Jul 2012 07:22:39, Evertjan.<exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net>
>> posted:
>>
>>> Robert Baer wrote on 28 jul 2012 in comp.lang.javascript:
>>
>>> <https://www.google.com/search?q=javascript+slideshow>
>>>
>>> 273.000.000 hits.
>>>
>>> Be welcome to come back if there are no hints in any of these.
>>
>>
>> Not a helpful attitude.  It is the quality of the hits that matters, not
>> the mere quantity.
>>
>> One gets better results, on the average, with
>> <https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=javascript+merlyn+slideshow>.
>>
>  Boy, that site is really crappy!
>  1) black on dark violet is not exactly easy to read, close to Y-rated
>= = not fit even for adults.
>  2) just try to enter ANY text; spaces "escape" out and one has to
>fiddle around to bet back for text entry; for the shits.
>
>  Since it was anti-user, i went no further.

Which site?  Please read your articles two or three times before you
post them, to see whether they make sense.  Others are likely to try
only once.

If you mean the first site that I find listed
(gallery.azusablooms.com/...), please remember that
(1) The order in which Google lists sites can depend on all sorts of
    things,
(2) One should not look only at the first site listed,
(3) I wrote "on the average".


-- 
 (c) John Stockton, nr London, UK.    ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk     Turnpike v6.05.
 Website  <http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> - w. FAQish topics, links, acronyms
 PAS EXE etc. : <http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/programs/> - see in 00index.htm
 Dates - miscdate.htm estrdate.htm js-dates.htm pas-time.htm critdate.htm etc.

Thread

Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-07-26 23:07 -0700
  Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-27 07:01 +0000
    Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-07-27 20:29 -0700
      Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-28 07:22 +0000
        Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-07-29 00:57 -0700
          Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-29 08:23 +0000
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:00 -0700
              Re: Sequential JPGs? Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-08-09 17:12 +0200
                Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-09 18:51 +0000
                Re: Sequential JPGs? "Eric Bednarz" <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-08-11 02:37 +0200
                Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-11 07:39 +0000
                Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 16:01 -0700
                Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 15:58 -0700
          Re: Sequential JPGs? SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-09 16:01 +0200
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 15:56 -0700
        Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1230@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-07-29 21:10 +0100
          Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-30 08:13 +0000
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Mike Duffy <Use_guestbook_page@website.in.sig> - 2012-07-30 11:48 +0000
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1231@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-07-31 19:45 +0100
              Re: Sequential JPGs? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-31 17:55 -0700
                Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-01 07:04 +0000
                Re: Sequential JPGs? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-08-01 10:53 -0700
                Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:18 -0700
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:10 -0700
          Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:09 -0700
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1232@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-08-06 19:37 +0100
  Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1230@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-07-28 19:22 +0100
  Re: Sequential JPGs? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-07-30 08:24 -0700

csiph-web