Re: Sequential JPGs?

Path	csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.posted.localnet!news.posted.localnet.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Sat, 04 Aug 2012 23:09:45 -0500
Date	Sat, 04 Aug 2012 21:09:42 -0700
From	Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com>
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.0; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Firefox/10.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.7.1
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Subject	Re: Sequential JPGs?
References	<TbCdncZaMuiorY_NnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@posted.localnet> <XnsA09D5BC07E46eejj99@194.109.133.133> <pfadnV4pd9kRwY7NnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d@posted.localnet> <XnsA09E5F61FA229eejj99@194.109.133.133> <4$$RGBTSjZFQFwnm@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid>
In-Reply-To	<4$$RGBTSjZFQFwnm@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Message-ID	<ou2dnTqTSrmUb4DNnZ2dnUVZ_hadnZ2d@posted.localnet> (permalink)
Lines	28
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	67.168.185.228
X-Trace	sv3-rQjmnkKp1jbbMxXU9iKCDiwubAiIDLoTUroGp5nUoKRdhJLCSbs6ZHnrl4fZXkjurL6XMEKPeJ2aLvn!mVvHeBXynWg9aQKNyyNCPt5DAzkRJCIjUsDlY+7qVfXmO+iK8/TSsIsalnYajm6h3jgwERGPiEu4!R7Q8UfifoHJQ0s7qp9IjRpmbKyRrzxxp
X-Complaints-To	abuse@localnet.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To	abuse@localnet.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	2404
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:15269

Show key headers only | View raw

Dr J R Stockton wrote:
> In comp.lang.javascript message<XnsA09E5F61FA229eejj99@194.109.133.133>
> , Sat, 28 Jul 2012 07:22:39, Evertjan.<exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net>
> posted:
>
>> Robert Baer wrote on 28 jul 2012 in comp.lang.javascript:
>
>> <https://www.google.com/search?q=javascript+slideshow>
>>
>> 273.000.000 hits.
>>
>> Be welcome to come back if there are no hints in any of these.
>
>
> Not a helpful attitude.  It is the quality of the hits that matters, not
> the mere quantity.
>
> One gets better results, on the average, with
> <https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=javascript+merlyn+slideshow>.
>
   Boy, that site is really crappy!
   1) black on dark violet is not exactly easy to read, close to Y-rated 
= = not fit even for adults.
   2) just try to enter ANY text; spaces "escape" out and one has to 
fiddle around to bet back for text entry; for the shits.

   Since it was anti-user, i went no further.

Thread

Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-07-26 23:07 -0700
  Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-27 07:01 +0000
    Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-07-27 20:29 -0700
      Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-28 07:22 +0000
        Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-07-29 00:57 -0700
          Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-29 08:23 +0000
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:00 -0700
              Re: Sequential JPGs? Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-08-09 17:12 +0200
                Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-09 18:51 +0000
                Re: Sequential JPGs? "Eric Bednarz" <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-08-11 02:37 +0200
                Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-11 07:39 +0000
                Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 16:01 -0700
                Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 15:58 -0700
          Re: Sequential JPGs? SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-09 16:01 +0200
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 15:56 -0700
        Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1230@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-07-29 21:10 +0100
          Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-30 08:13 +0000
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Mike Duffy <Use_guestbook_page@website.in.sig> - 2012-07-30 11:48 +0000
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1231@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-07-31 19:45 +0100
              Re: Sequential JPGs? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-31 17:55 -0700
                Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-01 07:04 +0000
                Re: Sequential JPGs? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-08-01 10:53 -0700
                Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:18 -0700
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:10 -0700
          Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:09 -0700
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1232@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-08-06 19:37 +0100
  Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1230@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-07-28 19:22 +0100
  Re: Sequential JPGs? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-07-30 08:24 -0700

csiph-web