Re: onload and onclick

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Subject	Re: onload and onclick
Date	Sat, 2 Apr 2016 01:43:00 +0200
Organization	albasani.net
Lines	40
Message-ID	<ndn124$b06$2@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References	<ndb6qc$evs$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ndc59k$s7s$2@news.albasani.net> <3360887.gmJMtLSuvG@PointedEars.de> <ndcct2$9p7$1@news.albasani.net> <21488317.CWynO2UuzJ@PointedEars.de> <ndcqbt$hmm$1@news.albasani.net> <1797506.KqYzdIyRau@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	news.albasani.net If8ZhR8sVp5WeAZ8sbQpdtC2q7PaIM0JynvNlpcEgiKgPT7qgmlW2ScN+s7rFUuRUTG6JVEUTGw6cy27ARW7eQ==
NNTP-Posting-Date	Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:43:00 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	news.albasani.net; logging-data="Z3IZREDOX+QQGe+pCFIeubP+SAlxRUA6NSbSW/m+fkK8Rer3WYAb8mjdewV623e+6gbFej2CRM6j+tTG7FqzW2lz2knZBgaDTmyOOgMej2BiQwR1UKcJHfiyscHRWUpc"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
In-Reply-To	<1797506.KqYzdIyRau@PointedEars.de>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:xO0fz9ufnIs39KKh2O5uCP0ZLtA=
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status	N1110
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:30176

Show key headers only | View raw

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Stefan Weiss wrote:
>> A - statement
>> B - give evidence
>> A - no
>> B - statement is therefore false
> 
> Straw man.

Could have been a voodoo doll...

> You of all people dare to lecture about logic?

Of all people, I dare.

> It is an unwritten (and even a written, read Aristotle) rule of a
> *constructive* discussion that those who make the claims must
> substantiate them.

I have neither the time nor the inclination to spell out the obvious to
you. The "evidence" is trivial and implied in the statement. You can
simply try it out and verify it - voila, evidence.

> Assuming that those who doubt them must do that, or that they must
> prove that the opposite is true, is actually *your* fallacy: shifting
> the burden of proof.

I don't have to prove anything. We both know how identifiers are resolved in
a browser, you're just playing dumb. "Cite evidence" is one of your common
go-to phrases used for distraction, and I'm not falling for it.

> Insofar you *are* wasting your time.  You are wasting it winding around the 
> issue, arguing solely based on supposition.  And *I* am not going to waste 
> *my* time on *that* (hence the snipping).

Since my post contained plenty of concrete counterexamples to your claims,
I suspect that the snipping had a different reason.

- stefan

Thread

onload and onclick emf <emfril@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 08:07 -0400
  Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 22:47 +0200
    Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-28 23:23 +0200
      Re: onload and onclick Frank Kozuschnik <franko@nurfuerspam.de> - 2016-03-29 00:20 +0200
        Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-29 00:43 +0200
      Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 00:57 +0200
        Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-29 02:04 +0200
          Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 04:47 +0200
            Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-31 20:06 +0200
              Re: onload and onclick Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-03-31 15:37 -0300
              Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 01:43 +0200
    Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-29 00:33 +0200
    Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 05:03 +0200
    Re: onload and onclick emf <emfril@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 01:45 -0400
  Re: onload and onclick Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-03-28 18:33 -0300

csiph-web