Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #30176
| From | Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: onload and onclick |
| Date | 2016-04-02 01:43 +0200 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <ndn124$b06$2@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <3360887.gmJMtLSuvG@PointedEars.de> <ndcct2$9p7$1@news.albasani.net> <21488317.CWynO2UuzJ@PointedEars.de> <ndcqbt$hmm$1@news.albasani.net> <1797506.KqYzdIyRau@PointedEars.de> |
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > Stefan Weiss wrote: >> A - statement >> B - give evidence >> A - no >> B - statement is therefore false > > Straw man. Could have been a voodoo doll... > You of all people dare to lecture about logic? Of all people, I dare. > It is an unwritten (and even a written, read Aristotle) rule of a > *constructive* discussion that those who make the claims must > substantiate them. I have neither the time nor the inclination to spell out the obvious to you. The "evidence" is trivial and implied in the statement. You can simply try it out and verify it - voila, evidence. > Assuming that those who doubt them must do that, or that they must > prove that the opposite is true, is actually *your* fallacy: shifting > the burden of proof. I don't have to prove anything. We both know how identifiers are resolved in a browser, you're just playing dumb. "Cite evidence" is one of your common go-to phrases used for distraction, and I'm not falling for it. > Insofar you *are* wasting your time. You are wasting it winding around the > issue, arguing solely based on supposition. And *I* am not going to waste > *my* time on *that* (hence the snipping). Since my post contained plenty of concrete counterexamples to your claims, I suspect that the snipping had a different reason. - stefan
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
onload and onclick emf <emfril@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 08:07 -0400
Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 22:47 +0200
Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-28 23:23 +0200
Re: onload and onclick Frank Kozuschnik <franko@nurfuerspam.de> - 2016-03-29 00:20 +0200
Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-29 00:43 +0200
Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 00:57 +0200
Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-29 02:04 +0200
Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 04:47 +0200
Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-31 20:06 +0200
Re: onload and onclick Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-03-31 15:37 -0300
Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 01:43 +0200
Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-29 00:33 +0200
Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 05:03 +0200
Re: onload and onclick emf <emfril@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 01:45 -0400
Re: onload and onclick Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-03-28 18:33 -0300
csiph-web