Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #30176

Re: onload and onclick

From Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: onload and onclick
Date 2016-04-02 01:43 +0200
Organization albasani.net
Message-ID <ndn124$b06$2@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <3360887.gmJMtLSuvG@PointedEars.de> <ndcct2$9p7$1@news.albasani.net> <21488317.CWynO2UuzJ@PointedEars.de> <ndcqbt$hmm$1@news.albasani.net> <1797506.KqYzdIyRau@PointedEars.de>

Show all headers | View raw


Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Stefan Weiss wrote:
>> A - statement
>> B - give evidence
>> A - no
>> B - statement is therefore false
> 
> Straw man.

Could have been a voodoo doll...

> You of all people dare to lecture about logic?

Of all people, I dare.

> It is an unwritten (and even a written, read Aristotle) rule of a
> *constructive* discussion that those who make the claims must
> substantiate them.

I have neither the time nor the inclination to spell out the obvious to
you. The "evidence" is trivial and implied in the statement. You can
simply try it out and verify it - voila, evidence.

> Assuming that those who doubt them must do that, or that they must
> prove that the opposite is true, is actually *your* fallacy: shifting
> the burden of proof.

I don't have to prove anything. We both know how identifiers are resolved in
a browser, you're just playing dumb. "Cite evidence" is one of your common
go-to phrases used for distraction, and I'm not falling for it.

> Insofar you *are* wasting your time.  You are wasting it winding around the 
> issue, arguing solely based on supposition.  And *I* am not going to waste 
> *my* time on *that* (hence the snipping).

Since my post contained plenty of concrete counterexamples to your claims,
I suspect that the snipping had a different reason.


- stefan

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

onload and onclick emf <emfril@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 08:07 -0400
  Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 22:47 +0200
    Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-28 23:23 +0200
      Re: onload and onclick Frank Kozuschnik <franko@nurfuerspam.de> - 2016-03-29 00:20 +0200
        Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-29 00:43 +0200
      Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 00:57 +0200
        Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-29 02:04 +0200
          Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 04:47 +0200
            Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-31 20:06 +0200
              Re: onload and onclick Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-03-31 15:37 -0300
              Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 01:43 +0200
    Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-29 00:33 +0200
    Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 05:03 +0200
    Re: onload and onclick emf <emfril@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 01:45 -0400
  Re: onload and onclick Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-03-28 18:33 -0300

csiph-web