Re: onload and onclick

From	Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Subject	Re: onload and onclick
Date	2016-03-31 20:06 +0200
Organization	PointedEars Software (PES)
Message-ID	<1797506.KqYzdIyRau@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <ndc59k$s7s$2@news.albasani.net> <3360887.gmJMtLSuvG@PointedEars.de> <ndcct2$9p7$1@news.albasani.net> <21488317.CWynO2UuzJ@PointedEars.de> <ndcqbt$hmm$1@news.albasani.net>

Show all headers | View raw

Stefan Weiss wrote:

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Stefan Weiss wrote:
>>>>> - Explicitly referring to the `window` object is optional;
>>>> Cite evidence.
>>> No, do your own homework.
>> IOW, you do not substantiate your claim, so we can safely assume it is
>> nonsense based on wishful thinking and insufficient testing.
> 
> A - statement
> B - give evidence
> A - no
> B - statement is therefore false

Straw man.

> If this passes as logic for you, it explains a lot. […]

You of all people dare to lecture about logic?  It is an unwritten (and even 
a written, read Aristotle) rule of a *constructive* discussion that those 
who make the claims must substantiate them.  Assuming that those who doubt 
them must do that, or that they must prove that the opposite is true, is 
actually *your* fallacy: shifting the burden of proof.  And you have 
committed this fallacy not only once here.

Insofar you *are* wasting your time.  You are wasting it winding around the 
issue, arguing solely based on supposition.  And *I* am not going to waste 
*my* time on *that* (hence the snipping).

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Thread

onload and onclick emf <emfril@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 08:07 -0400
  Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 22:47 +0200
    Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-28 23:23 +0200
      Re: onload and onclick Frank Kozuschnik <franko@nurfuerspam.de> - 2016-03-29 00:20 +0200
        Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-29 00:43 +0200
      Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 00:57 +0200
        Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-29 02:04 +0200
          Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 04:47 +0200
            Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-31 20:06 +0200
              Re: onload and onclick Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-03-31 15:37 -0300
              Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 01:43 +0200
    Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-29 00:33 +0200
    Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 05:03 +0200
    Re: onload and onclick emf <emfril@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 01:45 -0400
  Re: onload and onclick Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-03-28 18:33 -0300

csiph-web