Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #30162

Re: onload and onclick

From Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: onload and onclick
Date 2016-03-31 15:37 -0300
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <ndjqjg$p21$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <3360887.gmJMtLSuvG@PointedEars.de> <ndcct2$9p7$1@news.albasani.net> <21488317.CWynO2UuzJ@PointedEars.de> <ndcqbt$hmm$1@news.albasani.net> <1797506.KqYzdIyRau@PointedEars.de>

Show all headers | View raw


On 31/03/16 15:06, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Stefan Weiss wrote:
> 
>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>> Stefan Weiss wrote:
>>>>>> - Explicitly referring to the `window` object is optional;
>>>>> Cite evidence.
>>>> No, do your own homework.
>>> IOW, you do not substantiate your claim, so we can safely assume it is
>>> nonsense based on wishful thinking and insufficient testing.
>>
>> A - statement
>> B - give evidence
>> A - no
>> B - statement is therefore false
> 
> Straw man.
> 
>> If this passes as logic for you, it explains a lot. […]
> 
> You of all people dare to lecture about logic?  It is an unwritten (and even 
> a written, read Aristotle) rule of a *constructive* discussion that those 
> who make the claims must substantiate them.  Assuming that those who doubt 
> them must do that, or that they must prove that the opposite is true, is 
> actually *your* fallacy: shifting the burden of proof.  And you have 
> committed this fallacy not only once here.
> 
> Insofar you *are* wasting your time.  You are wasting it winding around the 
> issue, arguing solely based on supposition.  And *I* am not going to waste 
> *my* time on *that* (hence the snipping).

On the other hand, you can't keep asking for evidence on about any claim
you don't understand.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

onload and onclick emf <emfril@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 08:07 -0400
  Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 22:47 +0200
    Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-28 23:23 +0200
      Re: onload and onclick Frank Kozuschnik <franko@nurfuerspam.de> - 2016-03-29 00:20 +0200
        Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-29 00:43 +0200
      Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 00:57 +0200
        Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-29 02:04 +0200
          Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 04:47 +0200
            Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-31 20:06 +0200
              Re: onload and onclick Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-03-31 15:37 -0300
              Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 01:43 +0200
    Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-29 00:33 +0200
    Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 05:03 +0200
    Re: onload and onclick emf <emfril@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 01:45 -0400
  Re: onload and onclick Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-03-28 18:33 -0300

csiph-web