Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #30162
| From | Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: onload and onclick |
| Date | 2016-03-31 15:37 -0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ndjqjg$p21$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <3360887.gmJMtLSuvG@PointedEars.de> <ndcct2$9p7$1@news.albasani.net> <21488317.CWynO2UuzJ@PointedEars.de> <ndcqbt$hmm$1@news.albasani.net> <1797506.KqYzdIyRau@PointedEars.de> |
On 31/03/16 15:06, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > Stefan Weiss wrote: > >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>> Stefan Weiss wrote: >>>>>> - Explicitly referring to the `window` object is optional; >>>>> Cite evidence. >>>> No, do your own homework. >>> IOW, you do not substantiate your claim, so we can safely assume it is >>> nonsense based on wishful thinking and insufficient testing. >> >> A - statement >> B - give evidence >> A - no >> B - statement is therefore false > > Straw man. > >> If this passes as logic for you, it explains a lot. […] > > You of all people dare to lecture about logic? It is an unwritten (and even > a written, read Aristotle) rule of a *constructive* discussion that those > who make the claims must substantiate them. Assuming that those who doubt > them must do that, or that they must prove that the opposite is true, is > actually *your* fallacy: shifting the burden of proof. And you have > committed this fallacy not only once here. > > Insofar you *are* wasting your time. You are wasting it winding around the > issue, arguing solely based on supposition. And *I* am not going to waste > *my* time on *that* (hence the snipping). On the other hand, you can't keep asking for evidence on about any claim you don't understand.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
onload and onclick emf <emfril@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 08:07 -0400
Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 22:47 +0200
Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-28 23:23 +0200
Re: onload and onclick Frank Kozuschnik <franko@nurfuerspam.de> - 2016-03-29 00:20 +0200
Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-29 00:43 +0200
Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 00:57 +0200
Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-29 02:04 +0200
Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 04:47 +0200
Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-31 20:06 +0200
Re: onload and onclick Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-03-31 15:37 -0300
Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 01:43 +0200
Re: onload and onclick Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-29 00:33 +0200
Re: onload and onclick Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 05:03 +0200
Re: onload and onclick emf <emfril@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 01:45 -0400
Re: onload and onclick Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-03-28 18:33 -0300
csiph-web