Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #15591
| From | Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator |
| Date | 2012-08-28 02:14 +0200 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <k1h2gf$2o2$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <5c08b4d4-5162-4580-9c9e-d23937e046e2@z17g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <5039ec17$0$6192$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <1e52efa2-bcfe-45f6-a005-608614428fbb@k3g2000yqo.googlegroups.com> <k1e26f$r6g$1@dont-email.me> <k1g9kk$qvf$1@dont-email.me> |
On 2012-08-27 19:09, Martin Leese wrote: > Denis McMahon wrote: > ... >> 15) In my opinion, It's a good habit to get into the practice of >> specifying attributes such as nowrap, readonly, selected in the form >> attr="attr", ie readonly="readonly", selected="selected", nowrap="nowrap", >> even if you are only using html 4.01. > > Thanks for this. The other advice was good > to, but this was one of which I hadn't > thought. (It even validates at 4.01 Strict.) Just be aware that this advice is just an opinion. Some people do it, some websites (like W3Schools, unsurprisingly) think it's the only way. It may not do any harm, but personally I can't see any advantage of <option selected="selected"> over <option selected>. If you're using HTML (as opposed to XHTML), value-less attributes are perfectly fine. By the way, the "nowrap" attribute shouldn't be used anymore at all. It was deprecated in HTML 4.01 and removed in HTML 5. - stefan
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 06:18 -0700
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Martin Honnen <mahotrash@yahoo.de> - 2012-08-25 15:39 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 09:27 -0700
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 18:53 +0000
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-26 11:13 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Dr J R Stockton <reply1234@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-08-26 18:54 +0100
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-25 20:39 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 14:07 -0700
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Martin Honnen <mahotrash@yahoo.de> - 2012-08-26 11:23 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-26 11:27 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-08-26 06:26 -0700
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-08-26 08:48 -0700
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-26 20:55 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-08-26 20:50 +0000
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-26 21:30 +0000
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-08-26 22:29 +0000
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-26 23:32 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-08-26 22:39 +0000
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-27 04:23 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2012-08-27 11:09 -0600
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-08-28 02:14 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-08-28 14:53 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2012-08-28 11:29 -0600
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-08-25 12:44 -0700
csiph-web