Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #15583
| From | Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator |
| Date | 2012-08-26 22:29 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <k1e807$i6p$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <5c08b4d4-5162-4580-9c9e-d23937e046e2@z17g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <5039ec17$0$6192$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <1e52efa2-bcfe-45f6-a005-608614428fbb@k3g2000yqo.googlegroups.com> <k1e26f$r6g$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA0BBEF27039BDeejj99@194.109.133.133> |
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 21:30:34 +0000, Evertjan. wrote: > Denis McMahon wrote on 26 aug 2012 in comp.lang.javascript: > >> The html is broken in several ways: >> >> 1) You use <br/>, this is normally written <br /> (note space before >> "/") (see also 13) > Nonsense! > > HTML is <br> > > <br/> or <br /> is NOT html. Yes, I know. I'm not sure if the OP is serving this as xhtml or html, if he's serving xhtml it should be <br />. If you read my comments through I pointed out further down that it seems to be html, and that if so, he doesn't need to close the br xml style, or the inputs or need </option> (although imo closing option, like li and p, is good practice). Likewise, he doesn't have to declare values for readonly, selected or nowrap attributes, but again imo it's a good idea to do so. If the OP's page is xhtml (suggested by <br/>) then it's broken by the unclosed option and input elements amongst others. If the OP's page is html (suggested by the unclosed option and input elements, the lack of value assignments to selected and readonly attributes, and the use of the nowrap td attribute), then the <br/> is wrong. Ultimately the markup the OP has offered us is not compliant with any defined schema that I'm aware of. Rgds Denis McMahon
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 06:18 -0700
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Martin Honnen <mahotrash@yahoo.de> - 2012-08-25 15:39 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 09:27 -0700
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 18:53 +0000
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-26 11:13 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Dr J R Stockton <reply1234@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-08-26 18:54 +0100
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-25 20:39 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 14:07 -0700
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Martin Honnen <mahotrash@yahoo.de> - 2012-08-26 11:23 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-26 11:27 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-08-26 06:26 -0700
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-08-26 08:48 -0700
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-26 20:55 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-08-26 20:50 +0000
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-26 21:30 +0000
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-08-26 22:29 +0000
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-26 23:32 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-08-26 22:39 +0000
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-27 04:23 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2012-08-27 11:09 -0600
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-08-28 02:14 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-08-28 14:53 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2012-08-28 11:29 -0600
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-08-25 12:44 -0700
csiph-web