Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #15592
| Message-ID | <1425526.EZpXKcVxos@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | 2012-08-28 14:53 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | (3 earlier) <5039ec17$0$6192$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <1e52efa2-bcfe-45f6-a005-608614428fbb@k3g2000yqo.googlegroups.com> <k1e26f$r6g$1@dont-email.me> <k1g9kk$qvf$1@dont-email.me> <k1h2gf$2o2$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.javascript |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript
Stefan Weiss wrote: > On 2012-08-27 19:09, Martin Leese wrote: >> Denis McMahon wrote: >> ... >>> 15) In my opinion, It's a good habit to get into the practice of >>> specifying attributes such as nowrap, readonly, selected in the form >>> attr="attr", ie readonly="readonly", selected="selected", >>> nowrap="nowrap", even if you are only using html 4.01. >> >> Thanks for this. The other advice was good >> to, but this was one of which I hadn't >> thought. (It even validates at 4.01 Strict.) > > Just be aware that this advice is just an opinion. No, it is just bad advice: <http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/appendix/notes.html#h-B.3.4> > Some people do it, some websites (like W3Schools, unsurprisingly) think > it's the only way. $DEITY protect us from the utter nonsense spread readily by W3Schools. The W3C should sue them for abusing their name. PointedEars -- > If you get a bunch of authors […] that state the same "best practices" > in any programming language, then you can bet who is wrong or right... Not with javascript. Nonsense propagates like wildfire in this field. -- Richard Cornford, comp.lang.javascript, 2011-11-14
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 06:18 -0700
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Martin Honnen <mahotrash@yahoo.de> - 2012-08-25 15:39 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 09:27 -0700
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 18:53 +0000
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-26 11:13 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Dr J R Stockton <reply1234@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-08-26 18:54 +0100
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-25 20:39 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 14:07 -0700
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Martin Honnen <mahotrash@yahoo.de> - 2012-08-26 11:23 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-26 11:27 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-08-26 06:26 -0700
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-08-26 08:48 -0700
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-26 20:55 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-08-26 20:50 +0000
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-26 21:30 +0000
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-08-26 22:29 +0000
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-26 23:32 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-08-26 22:39 +0000
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-27 04:23 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2012-08-27 11:09 -0600
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-08-28 02:14 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-08-28 14:53 +0200
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2012-08-28 11:29 -0600
Re: Sum of several fields using parseInt differs from that of using a calculator "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-08-25 12:44 -0700
csiph-web