Re: window.open allowing image to scale

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Subject	Re: window.open allowing image to scale
Date	Wed, 04 Jun 2014 15:16:33 +0200
Organization	PointedEars Software (PES)
Lines	32
Message-ID	<7308079.QRScOfK5AC@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References	<_oqdnbF7roH_oBDOnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <icydndWnyInWohDOnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <XnsA3415AC3A73ECeejj99@194.109.133.133> <2020767.akXlH5UOMh@PointedEars.de> <XnsA34298E451903eejj99@194.109.133.133>
Reply-To	Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8Bit
X-Trace	solani.org 1401887796 25781 eJwNycERACEIA8CWCJJ4lqMI/ZdwzuxvOQTlDFHBZnupWAFF2gaJQ3/D1ffBlecpE+ybtEX7AQ6NED0= (4 Jun 2014 13:16:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@news.solani.org
NNTP-Posting-Date	Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:16:36 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent	KNode/4.12.4
X-User-ID	eJwNzMkRACEIBMCUOJxhCQdF8g9hfXdVw6k8sQguDKYpebGLtrapMdEouHrwsV5+bXJ8kjfZp7ylJKbRWS/gDzuCFTs=
Face	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
X-Face	%i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&.<b';Md8`dH6iqhT)6C^.Px\|[=M@7=Ik[_w<%n1Up"LPQNu2m8\|L!/3iby{-]A+#YE}Kl{Cw$\U!kD%K}\2jz"QQP6Uqr],./"?;=4v
Cancel-Lock	sha1:+ATgTocaa+3HXkqf/ykN8luo6ns=
X-NNTP-Posting-Host	eJwFwQkRwEAIBDBLfLsFOYUB/xIugVM5XxAMHC6tc44ZEEfZ+iAuFP3vbhda5mLVRkskmQ8XAxDW
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:24606

Show key headers only | View raw

Evertjan. wrote:

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote on 04 jun 2014 in
> comp.lang.javascript:

Will you ever learn?

>>> unless you want a second .document.write()
>>> to overwrite the document by inducing the implicit .open()
>> 
>> No, a second document.write() call will send further content to the same
>> input stream unless it has been closed.
> 
> It seems reading English is difficult for you, Thomas.

Your statement

>>> this .document.close() is not needed,
>>> unless you want a second .document.write()
>>> to overwrite the document by inducing the implicit .open()

is wrong.  document.close() is needed here in any case.  document.write() 
does not necessarily “induce the implicit .open()”.  And obviously it makes 
no sense at all to issue a document.close() followed by a document.write().

IOW, you have been writing nonsense.  So much for understanding English.

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Thread

window.open allowing image to scale Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-03 13:11 +1000
  Re: window.open allowing image to scale Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-03 13:19 +1000
    Re: window.open allowing image to scale "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-06-03 08:55 +0200
      Re: window.open allowing image to scale Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-03 18:38 +1000
        Re: window.open allowing image to scale "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-06-03 10:58 +0200
      Re: window.open allowing image to scale Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-06-04 11:28 +0200
        Re: window.open allowing image to scale "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-06-04 15:01 +0200
          Re: window.open allowing image to scale Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-06-04 15:16 +0200
            Re: window.open allowing image to scale "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-06-04 16:51 +0200
        Re: window.open allowing image to scale John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-06-04 14:47 +0100
          Re: window.open allowing image to scale Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-06-04 17:35 +0200
            Re: window.open allowing image to scale Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-06-04 18:18 +0200
              Re: window.open allowing image to scale John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-06-05 11:12 +0100
            Re: window.open allowing image to scale John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-06-05 11:03 +0100
              Re: window.open allowing image to scale Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-06-05 17:43 +0200
                Re: window.open allowing image to scale John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-06-06 11:09 +0100
              Re: window.open allowing image to scale Dr J R Stockton <reply1400@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2014-06-08 19:41 +0100

csiph-web