Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #24699

Re: window.open allowing image to scale

From Dr J R Stockton <reply1400@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: window.open allowing image to scale
Date 2014-06-08 19:41 +0100
Organization Home
Message-ID <XvATAqTl5KlTFweA@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <XnsA3415AC3A73ECeejj99@194.109.133.133> <2020767.akXlH5UOMh@PointedEars.de> <br8uo99tgja4gk0hpa4coldibmv1pjv0sj@4ax.com> <538f3cc6$0$6659$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <53g0p9pqtogh2nfe05c4fpo5k2v2u2uocq@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw


In comp.lang.javascript message <53g0p9pqtogh2nfe05c4fpo5k2v2u2uocq@4ax.
com>, Thu, 5 Jun 2014 11:03:50, John Harris
<niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> posted:

>On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 17:35:38 +0200, Christoph Michael Becker
><cmbecker69@arcor.de> wrote:
>
>>John Harris wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 11:28:41 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
>>><PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> On the other hand, the header
>>> Face: [snipped content]
>>> is an antisocial header used by a frequent poster to this news group.
>>
>>Why is it "antisocial"?
>
>If an 85 character attribution is supposed to be anti-social then how
>can a 950 character unstandardised optional header be anything else?

I'd rather get an unseen 950 character unstandardised optional header
than the copious visible spewings of the rubbery one.  Why can he not
following the example of one of Germany's famous leaders and invent
something useful?


-- 
 (c) John Stockton, Surrey, UK.  ¬@merlyn.demon.co.uk   Turnpike v6.05   MIME.
   Web  <http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> - FAQish topics, acronyms, & links.
 Proper <= 4-line sig. separator as above, a line exactly "-- " (SonOfRFC1036)
 Do not Mail News to me. Before a reply, quote with ">" or "> " (SonOfRFC1036)

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

window.open allowing image to scale Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-03 13:11 +1000
  Re: window.open allowing image to scale Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-03 13:19 +1000
    Re: window.open allowing image to scale "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-06-03 08:55 +0200
      Re: window.open allowing image to scale Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-03 18:38 +1000
        Re: window.open allowing image to scale "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-06-03 10:58 +0200
      Re: window.open allowing image to scale Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-06-04 11:28 +0200
        Re: window.open allowing image to scale "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-06-04 15:01 +0200
          Re: window.open allowing image to scale Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-06-04 15:16 +0200
            Re: window.open allowing image to scale "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-06-04 16:51 +0200
        Re: window.open allowing image to scale John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-06-04 14:47 +0100
          Re: window.open allowing image to scale Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-06-04 17:35 +0200
            Re: window.open allowing image to scale Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-06-04 18:18 +0200
              Re: window.open allowing image to scale John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-06-05 11:12 +0100
            Re: window.open allowing image to scale John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-06-05 11:03 +0100
              Re: window.open allowing image to scale Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-06-05 17:43 +0200
                Re: window.open allowing image to scale John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-06-06 11:09 +0100
              Re: window.open allowing image to scale Dr J R Stockton <reply1400@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2014-06-08 19:41 +0100

csiph-web