Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #24606

Re: window.open allowing image to scale

From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: window.open allowing image to scale
Date 2014-06-04 15:16 +0200
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Message-ID <7308079.QRScOfK5AC@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References <_oqdnbF7roH_oBDOnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <icydndWnyInWohDOnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <XnsA3415AC3A73ECeejj99@194.109.133.133> <2020767.akXlH5UOMh@PointedEars.de> <XnsA34298E451903eejj99@194.109.133.133>

Show all headers | View raw


Evertjan. wrote:

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote on 04 jun 2014 in
> comp.lang.javascript:

Will you ever learn?

>>> unless you want a second .document.write()
>>> to overwrite the document by inducing the implicit .open()
>> 
>> No, a second document.write() call will send further content to the same
>> input stream unless it has been closed.
> 
> It seems reading English is difficult for you, Thomas.

Your statement

>>> this .document.close() is not needed,
>>> unless you want a second .document.write()
>>> to overwrite the document by inducing the implicit .open()

is wrong.  document.close() is needed here in any case.  document.write() 
does not necessarily “induce the implicit .open()”.  And obviously it makes 
no sense at all to issue a document.close() followed by a document.write().

IOW, you have been writing nonsense.  So much for understanding English.

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

window.open allowing image to scale Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-03 13:11 +1000
  Re: window.open allowing image to scale Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-03 13:19 +1000
    Re: window.open allowing image to scale "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-06-03 08:55 +0200
      Re: window.open allowing image to scale Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-03 18:38 +1000
        Re: window.open allowing image to scale "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-06-03 10:58 +0200
      Re: window.open allowing image to scale Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-06-04 11:28 +0200
        Re: window.open allowing image to scale "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-06-04 15:01 +0200
          Re: window.open allowing image to scale Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-06-04 15:16 +0200
            Re: window.open allowing image to scale "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-06-04 16:51 +0200
        Re: window.open allowing image to scale John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-06-04 14:47 +0100
          Re: window.open allowing image to scale Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-06-04 17:35 +0200
            Re: window.open allowing image to scale Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-06-04 18:18 +0200
              Re: window.open allowing image to scale John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-06-05 11:12 +0100
            Re: window.open allowing image to scale John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-06-05 11:03 +0100
              Re: window.open allowing image to scale Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-06-05 17:43 +0200
                Re: window.open allowing image to scale John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-06-06 11:09 +0100
              Re: window.open allowing image to scale Dr J R Stockton <reply1400@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2014-06-08 19:41 +0100

csiph-web