Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #24590

Re: window.open allowing image to scale

Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: window.open allowing image to scale
From "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net>
References <_oqdnbF7roH_oBDOnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <icydndWnyInWohDOnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <XnsA3415AC3A73ECeejj99@194.109.133.133> <gsydnUxLraSSFxDOnZ2dnUVZ_jKdnZ2d@westnet.com.au>
Date 2014-06-03 10:58 +0200
Message-ID <XnsA3416FB3AB116eejj99@194.109.133.133> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> wrote on 03 jun 2014 in 
comp.lang.javascript:

> <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Window.open>
> says that
> 
> "NOTE: All features can be set to yes, 1 or just be present to
> be 'on', set to no or 0 or in most cases just not present to be 'off'
> example 'status=yes', 'status=1' and 'status' have identical results".
> 
> Does that note apply only to toolbar and chrome features and not to 
> window functionality features?

I seem to remember the original [non-mozilla?] spec was different.

Perhaps the default "1" is cross-browser proven.


-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

window.open allowing image to scale Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-03 13:11 +1000
  Re: window.open allowing image to scale Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-03 13:19 +1000
    Re: window.open allowing image to scale "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-06-03 08:55 +0200
      Re: window.open allowing image to scale Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2014-06-03 18:38 +1000
        Re: window.open allowing image to scale "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-06-03 10:58 +0200
      Re: window.open allowing image to scale Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-06-04 11:28 +0200
        Re: window.open allowing image to scale "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-06-04 15:01 +0200
          Re: window.open allowing image to scale Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-06-04 15:16 +0200
            Re: window.open allowing image to scale "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-06-04 16:51 +0200
        Re: window.open allowing image to scale John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-06-04 14:47 +0100
          Re: window.open allowing image to scale Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-06-04 17:35 +0200
            Re: window.open allowing image to scale Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-06-04 18:18 +0200
              Re: window.open allowing image to scale John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-06-05 11:12 +0100
            Re: window.open allowing image to scale John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-06-05 11:03 +0100
              Re: window.open allowing image to scale Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-06-05 17:43 +0200
                Re: window.open allowing image to scale John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-06-06 11:09 +0100
              Re: window.open allowing image to scale Dr J R Stockton <reply1400@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2014-06-08 19:41 +0100

csiph-web