Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #18037

Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach

Message-ID <2135847.KEoUBZbHTU@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Date 2013-01-09 21:03 +0100
Subject Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
References <kcilrc$vt8$1@dont-email.me> <10136443.OnBuAidq6I@PointedEars.de> <a2hre85m1aojpu1l2a46uqbklvnhq7ih3h@4ax.com> <kckh5m$d5l$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Followup-To comp.lang.javascript

Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript

Show all headers | View raw

Cezary Tomczyk wrote:

> Jim T. pisze:
>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>> Leonardo Azpurua wrote:
> [...]
>>>>      for (var i = 0; i < f.elements.length; i++)
>>>
>>>       for (var i = 0, len = f.elements.length; i < len; ++i)
>>
>> Why? Because it's faster? First, modern JS interpreters will probably
>> already do this optimization. Second, unless the form has a million
>> elements it will make no noticeable difference. Cleaner code is better
>> than pointless "optimization".
> 
> I wonder: what is not clean in this code?
> 
> for (var i = 0, len = f.elements.length; i < len; ++i)
> 
> Maybe you can write it as (as you want):
> 
> for (var i = 0, len = f.elements.length; i < len; i += 1)
> 
> Still can not see what can be confused here for developer. It's just a
> simple, one line begin of loop.

Probably they are under the illusion that they have a shadow of a clue what 
they are talking about (which was “modern JS interpreters” – OMG), and that
I would care very much about the humble opinion of address-munging nobodys.  
Or they are just a troll.  Do not feed.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Request for opinions on my newbie approach "Leonardo Azpurua" <leonardo@exmvps.org> - 2013-01-08 22:24 -0430
  Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-01-09 04:31 +0100
    Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach "Leonardo Azpurua" <leonardo@exmvps.org> - 2013-01-08 23:34 -0430
      Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-01-09 05:14 +0100
    Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Jim T. <x@y.z> - 2013-01-09 14:32 -0500
      Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2013-01-09 20:41 +0100
        Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-01-09 21:03 +0100
        Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Jim T. <x@y.z> - 2013-01-09 15:11 -0500
        Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Luc Yen <luc@goal.tw> - 2013-01-09 14:38 -0800
      Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach "Leonardo Azpurua" <leonardo@exmvps.org> - 2013-01-09 18:10 -0430
        Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-01-10 01:36 +0100

csiph-web