Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #18036
| From | Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach |
| Date | 2013-01-09 20:41 +0100 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <kckh5m$d5l$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <kcilrc$vt8$1@dont-email.me> <10136443.OnBuAidq6I@PointedEars.de> <a2hre85m1aojpu1l2a46uqbklvnhq7ih3h@4ax.com> |
W dniu 2013-01-09 20:32, Jim T. pisze: > On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 04:31:58 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn > <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: > >> Leonardo Azpurua wrote: [...] >>> for (var i = 0; i < f.elements.length; i++) >> >> for (var i = 0, len = f.elements.length; i < len; ++i) > > Why? Because it's faster? First, modern JS interpreters will probably > already do this optimization. Second, unless the form has a million > elements it will make no noticeable difference. Cleaner code is better > than pointless "optimization". I wonder: what is not clean in this code? for (var i = 0, len = f.elements.length; i < len; ++i) Maybe you can write it as (as you want): for (var i = 0, len = f.elements.length; i < len; i += 1) Still can not see what can be confused here for developer. It's just a simple, one line begin of loop. -- Cezary Tomczyk http://www.ctomczyk.pl/
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Request for opinions on my newbie approach "Leonardo Azpurua" <leonardo@exmvps.org> - 2013-01-08 22:24 -0430
Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-01-09 04:31 +0100
Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach "Leonardo Azpurua" <leonardo@exmvps.org> - 2013-01-08 23:34 -0430
Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-01-09 05:14 +0100
Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Jim T. <x@y.z> - 2013-01-09 14:32 -0500
Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2013-01-09 20:41 +0100
Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-01-09 21:03 +0100
Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Jim T. <x@y.z> - 2013-01-09 15:11 -0500
Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Luc Yen <luc@goal.tw> - 2013-01-09 14:38 -0800
Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach "Leonardo Azpurua" <leonardo@exmvps.org> - 2013-01-09 18:10 -0430
Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-01-10 01:36 +0100
csiph-web