Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #18030

Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach

Message-ID <1630347.0OQEqAhc4z@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Date 2013-01-09 05:14 +0100
Subject Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
References <kcilrc$vt8$1@dont-email.me> <10136443.OnBuAidq6I@PointedEars.de> <kcipvf$ifh$1@dont-email.me>
Followup-To comp.lang.javascript

Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript

Show all headers | View raw

Leonardo Azpurua wrote:

> 
> "Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn" <PointedEars@web.de> escribi� en el mensaje
> news:10136443.OnBuAidq6I@PointedEars.de...
>> Leonardo Azpurua wrote:
>>
>> These languages (on the client-side) so far use prototype-based
>> inheritance
>> only.  There are no classes.  "Object type" appears to be the term that
>> fits
>> best as it is used in the ECMAScript Specification.

This is unacceptable.  Either fix OE as suggested or use something 
considerably better (such as Thunderbird: <http://getthunderbird.com/>).  
You would do everyone a favor, yourself in double sense.

>>>     {
>>>        var e = f.elements[i];
>>>        this[e.id] = e;
>>
>> Not a good idea.  Keep in mind that
>>
>>  1. not all form controls (need to) have an ID;
>>  2. your wrapper object has other properties at that level that could be
>>     overwritten if a form control has the same

… ID as a property name of your wrapper object (I meant to say then).

> Since that library is basically for my own use, and my "standard" requires
> that every meaningful HTML element has an id, and that every id is unique
> within the file, it doesn't sem to be a problem.

Consider what would happen with

  <form … name="foo">
    <label for="name">Name:</label> <input id="name" name="name">
  </form>

> Thanks!

You're welcome.

> --

See above.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Request for opinions on my newbie approach "Leonardo Azpurua" <leonardo@exmvps.org> - 2013-01-08 22:24 -0430
  Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-01-09 04:31 +0100
    Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach "Leonardo Azpurua" <leonardo@exmvps.org> - 2013-01-08 23:34 -0430
      Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-01-09 05:14 +0100
    Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Jim T. <x@y.z> - 2013-01-09 14:32 -0500
      Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2013-01-09 20:41 +0100
        Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-01-09 21:03 +0100
        Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Jim T. <x@y.z> - 2013-01-09 15:11 -0500
        Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Luc Yen <luc@goal.tw> - 2013-01-09 14:38 -0800
      Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach "Leonardo Azpurua" <leonardo@exmvps.org> - 2013-01-09 18:10 -0430
        Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-01-10 01:36 +0100

csiph-web