Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-ID: <2135847.KEoUBZbHTU@PointedEars.de>
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <usenet@PointedEars.de>
Organization: PointedEars Software (PES)
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:03:06 +0100
User-Agent: KNode/4.4.11
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
Subject: Re: Request for opinions on my newbie approach
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
References: <kcilrc$vt8$1@dont-email.me> <10136443.OnBuAidq6I@PointedEars.de> <a2hre85m1aojpu1l2a46uqbklvnhq7ih3h@4ax.com> <kckh5m$d5l$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Followup-To: comp.lang.javascript
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 36
NNTP-Posting-Date: 09 Jan 2013 21:03:07 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: d9e86cbd.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: DXC=e1TfLnR_Cdo>jlK2>IgHGdA9EHlD;3Ycb4Fo<]lROoRa8kF<OcfhCOkZ`RZ1E_PbLoDZm8W4\YJNlb@mF9jNikde3>YBYU3JEomcGm;JCkQ1al
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:18037

Cezary Tomczyk wrote:

> Jim T. pisze:
>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>> Leonardo Azpurua wrote:
> [...]
>>>>      for (var i = 0; i < f.elements.length; i++)
>>>
>>>       for (var i = 0, len = f.elements.length; i < len; ++i)
>>
>> Why? Because it's faster? First, modern JS interpreters will probably
>> already do this optimization. Second, unless the form has a million
>> elements it will make no noticeable difference. Cleaner code is better
>> than pointless "optimization".
> 
> I wonder: what is not clean in this code?
> 
> for (var i = 0, len = f.elements.length; i < len; ++i)
> 
> Maybe you can write it as (as you want):
> 
> for (var i = 0, len = f.elements.length; i < len; i += 1)
> 
> Still can not see what can be confused here for developer. It's just a
> simple, one line begin of loop.

Probably they are under the illusion that they have a shadow of a clue what 
they are talking about (which was “modern JS interpreters” – OMG), and that
I would care very much about the humble opinion of address-munging nobodys.  
Or they are just a troll.  Do not feed.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.