Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #35709

Re: Java is faster!

From j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Java is faster!
Date 2016-10-04 11:08 +0200
Organization albasani.net
Message-ID <nsvri6$cqq$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <nss7ii$chv$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nst6c0$bg5$1@news.albasani.net> <nst6e1$bg5$2@news.albasani.net> <nst6pa$c52$1@news.albasani.net> <nsur6r$kvc$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

Arne Vajhøj schrieb:
> That is just a new version with a new name.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Runtime#Version_history
>
> All the restrictions still apply.
>
> Arne

You are right, I was googeling a little bit,
its more a platform for C++, C#, VB and JavaScript,
even a jitting JVM would probably not run, since some
special virtual memory ops are not available.

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13957609/would-java-virtual-machine-run-on-winrt

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Java is faster! Roedy Green <inquiry@mindprod.com> - 2016-09-30 03:05 -0700
  Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-01 12:50 +0200
    Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-01 12:53 +0200
      Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-01 11:36 -0400
        Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-01 23:39 +0200
          Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-02 08:32 -0400
            Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-02 18:36 +0200
              Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-02 20:08 -0400
                Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-03 10:54 +0200
                Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-03 10:55 +0200
                Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-03 11:01 +0200
                Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-03 19:56 -0400
                Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-04 11:08 +0200
                Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-04 19:50 -0400
                Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-03 19:59 -0400
                Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-03 20:04 -0400
                Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-03 20:14 -0400
      Re: Java is faster! Brixomatic <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-05 11:02 +0200
      Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-06 19:55 +0200
        Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-06 20:22 +0200
        Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-06 18:16 -0400
          Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-07 02:51 +0200
            Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-08 09:56 -0400
    Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-01 11:19 -0400
  Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-01 11:12 -0400

csiph-web