Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #35696

Re: Java is faster!

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/2/2016 12:36 PM, j4n bur53 wrote:
> Arne Vajhøj schrieb:
>>  > So its there. But I don't know yet how to
>>  > push .jar's to this brand new/old store.
>>
>> Unless MS changed something recently, then you can't.
>>
>> It is (or was if they changed it) only for applications
>> using the WinRT framework.
>>
>> The marketing term has changed over time, but the most recent I have
>> seen is Universal Windows Platform (UWP).
>>
>> Bottom line: no Java.
 >
 > No, no, its not only related to WinRT.
 > Since basically it allows to sell any
 > content, films, books, etc..

Hmm.

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/dn764944.aspx

<quote>
Windows Store Policies

Document version: 7.0

Document date: August 2, 2016

...

Your app may only depend on Windows Runtime APIs allowed for Store apps 
and must remain within the boundaries allowed for Store apps (e.g., 
cannot break out of the AppContainer).
</quote>

 > Maybe you can sneek in JARs just as some
 > content.

<quote>
Your app must not attempt to change or extend the described 
functionality through any form of dynamic inclusion of code that is in 
violation of Store Policies.
</quote>

 >                                         Or use Excelsior Jet, to make
 > your Java a WinRT.

I am pretty sure that an Excelsior Jet generated executable depend
on more than WinRT library.

 > Not yet sure what the path will be.
 > But you would use Excelsior Jet in much
 > more simpler way, you would spare the installer, right?

If Java is available then so can an executable jar.

Arne

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Java is faster! Roedy Green <inquiry@mindprod.com> - 2016-09-30 03:05 -0700
  Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-01 12:50 +0200
    Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-01 12:53 +0200
      Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-01 11:36 -0400
        Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-01 23:39 +0200
          Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-02 08:32 -0400
            Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-02 18:36 +0200
              Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-02 20:08 -0400
                Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-03 10:54 +0200
                Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-03 10:55 +0200
                Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-03 11:01 +0200
                Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-03 19:56 -0400
                Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-04 11:08 +0200
                Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-04 19:50 -0400
                Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-03 19:59 -0400
                Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-03 20:04 -0400
                Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-03 20:14 -0400
      Re: Java is faster! Brixomatic <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-05 11:02 +0200
      Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-06 19:55 +0200
        Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-06 20:22 +0200
        Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-06 18:16 -0400
          Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-07 02:51 +0200
            Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-08 09:56 -0400
    Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-01 11:19 -0400
  Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-01 11:12 -0400

csiph-web