Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #35676
| From | j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Java is faster! |
| Date | 2016-10-01 12:53 +0200 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <nso4jd$liu$2@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <faster-20160923143035@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <c2esub191c3evn7d9su99uqhf4hjajmsaj@4ax.com> <nso4ee$liu$1@news.albasani.net> |
Hi, BTW: I wonder whether installers will die out, since Windows 10 etc.. has an App store etc.. And also Windows has some new App manifests formats etc.. At least on Android etc.. there are mostly stores not apps with installers. And from the beginning there was this APK format. (Just saw, that Jet can also generate an installer) Bye j4n bur53 schrieb: > What is Jet? This one? > https://www.excelsiorjet.com/ > > Roedy Green schrieb: >> On 23 Sep 2016 13:31:38 GMT, ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) >> wrote: >> >>> "Java is faster! >>> In terms of throughput in a long running system ... >>> For specific applications ... >>> On a well tuned JVM ... >>> With near-optimal GC strategy selected ..." >>> >>> says Chandler Carruth, one of Google's C++ experts. (JFTR) >> >> I wrote some time ago about how astoundingly clever Jet was at >> optimising code generation. I was far faster than anything a human >> assembler programmer would generate. It was convoluted, but fast. The >> Jet people got freaked thinking my examples would imply their code was >> easy to disassemble and removed the option to display the generated >> assembler. >> >
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Java is faster! Roedy Green <inquiry@mindprod.com> - 2016-09-30 03:05 -0700
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-01 12:50 +0200
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-01 12:53 +0200
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-01 11:36 -0400
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-01 23:39 +0200
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-02 08:32 -0400
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-02 18:36 +0200
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-02 20:08 -0400
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-03 10:54 +0200
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-03 10:55 +0200
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-03 11:01 +0200
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-03 19:56 -0400
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-04 11:08 +0200
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-04 19:50 -0400
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-03 19:59 -0400
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-03 20:04 -0400
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-03 20:14 -0400
Re: Java is faster! Brixomatic <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-05 11:02 +0200
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-06 19:55 +0200
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-06 20:22 +0200
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-06 18:16 -0400
Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-07 02:51 +0200
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-08 09:56 -0400
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-01 11:19 -0400
Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-01 11:12 -0400
csiph-web