Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #35708

Re: Java is faster!

From	Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Java is faster!
Date	2016-10-03 20:14 -0400
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<nsus8t$mdo$5@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(7 earlier) <nsrd2q$u82$1@news.albasani.net> <nss7ii$chv$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nst6c0$bg5$1@news.albasani.net> <nsurd6$let$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nsurma$llf$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/3/2016 8:04 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 10/3/2016 7:59 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> On 10/3/2016 4:54 AM, j4n bur53 wrote:
>>> Arne Vajhøj schrieb:
>>>> I am pretty sure that an Excelsior Jet generated executable depend
>>>> on more than WinRT library.
>>>
>>> Mostlikely we are talking about different things.
>>> For example if I look at one of the newer formats
>>> like here:
>>> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/

hh446767%28v=vs.85%29.aspx#create_package_using_dir
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't see even a single mention of WinRT.
>>
>> It does not.
>>
>> But there are other pages explaining that aspect.
>
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/get-started/whats-a-uwp
>
> UWP apps use the Windows Runtime, a native API built into the operating
> system. This API is implemented in C++ and supported in C#, Visual
> Basic, C++, and JavaScript in a way that feels natural for each language.

If someone would want to try and make Excelsior Jet'ed Java run on UWP,
then I think what is needed is the socalled "desktop brige":

https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/bridges/desktop

http://www.techtimes.com/articles/178056/20160917/
microsoft-desktop-bridge-hard-at-work-first-apps-ported-to-universal-windows-platform-now-available-for-windows-10-users.htm

But I suspect that would require assistance from Excelsior.

Arne

Thread

Re: Java is faster! Roedy Green <inquiry@mindprod.com> - 2016-09-30 03:05 -0700
  Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-01 12:50 +0200
    Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-01 12:53 +0200
      Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-01 11:36 -0400
        Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-01 23:39 +0200
          Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-02 08:32 -0400
            Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-02 18:36 +0200
              Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-02 20:08 -0400
                Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-03 10:54 +0200
                Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-03 10:55 +0200
                Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-03 11:01 +0200
                Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-03 19:56 -0400
                Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-04 11:08 +0200
                Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-04 19:50 -0400
                Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-03 19:59 -0400
                Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-03 20:04 -0400
                Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-03 20:14 -0400
      Re: Java is faster! Brixomatic <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-05 11:02 +0200
      Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-06 19:55 +0200
        Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-06 20:22 +0200
        Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-06 18:16 -0400
          Re: Java is faster! j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2016-10-07 02:51 +0200
            Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-08 09:56 -0400
    Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-01 11:19 -0400
  Re: Java is faster! Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-10-01 11:12 -0400

csiph-web