Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #27023
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder2.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.bt.com!news.bt.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:35:56 -0600 |
| Date | Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:35:53 +0000 |
| From | lipska the kat <"lipskathekat at yahoo dot co dot uk"> |
| Organization | Trollbusters 3 |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes |
| References | <l7nuiv$ajm$1@news.albasani.net> <5yTqu.2639$oo4.861@fx02.iad> <52acd504$0$302$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <g4nru.546685$nC5.145367@fx06.iad> <MPG.2d1abfbf395d3ee22@202.177.16.121> <C17tu.56714$T27.44999@fx01.iad> <1Ymdndba6bj6HCjPnZ2dnUVZ8sKdnZ2d@bt.com> <fsltu.7672$VG.4096@fx12.iad> |
| In-Reply-To | <fsltu.7672$VG.4096@fx12.iad> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Message-ID | <BaudneAfxasBcCjPnZ2dnUVZ8oOdnZ2d@bt.com> (permalink) |
| Lines | 54 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| X-AuthenticatedUsername | NoAuthUser |
| X-Trace | sv3-eNB3EuPOd3U1N9nO+yLUcloxSWw9uqLV8ktdnheTyB2klK/riT9F3WYSi5ulsfP5e3+oqq2i7mKusxa!uOavTdcxQNpAMZmbVnlhMvMbczd9gYqYYoi+85+mdoGxHM0zPWfZCDDU2VCuDxMsWN+AUTSX9+tY |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@btinternet.com |
| X-DMCA-Complaints-To | abuse@btinternet.com |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 3505 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:27023 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 21/12/13 18:52, Arved Sandstrom wrote: > On 12/21/2013 07:54 AM, lipska the kat wrote: >> On 21/12/13 02:28, Arved Sandstrom wrote: >>> On 12/17/2013 03:09 PM, Wanja Gayk wrote: >>>> In article <g4nru.546685$nC5.145367@fx06.iad>, Arved Sandstrom >>>> (asandstrom2@eastlink.ca) says... >>>> >>>>> No aspersion on the M-F 9-5 programmers, Arne. But by definition M-F >>>>> 9-5 >>>>> programmers have made a decision - not something I will heavily >>>>> criticize - to confine their work to work hours, and keep their free >>>>> time for family and leisure. As such they don't spend nearly as much >>>>> time on off-hours professional education (if any), and we all know >>>>> that >>>>> work hours don't lend themselves to professional education either. >>>> >>>> To put it bluntly, this is nonsense. You can't generalize like that. >>> >>> Sure I can generalize like that. When I refer to a programmer as a M-F >>> 9-5 programmer, it's not a slur, it's a straightforward definition of a >>> programmer who only practices his trade M-F 9-5. >> >> <snip> >> >> Who works 9-5? <snip> >> 9-5 developers? >> No such thing. >> >> > Then you've certainly not ever been in a union, for starters. :-) > > And you've evidently never worked in a private sector company (like IBM > or Oracle or Microsoft, for example, or well-established local software > consultancies with lucrative long-term contracts) where usually the only > reason you work outside hours is because you're self-motivated, not > because anyone required you to do so. I did work for a large company once. Company car, company mobile, company laptop ... multiple layers of management, bored stiff. Start-ups was my thing. Design, prototype, implement, launch, get bored, move on. How can you be a developer without being self-motivated? -- Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer, treacherous feline and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun GNU/Linux user #560883 - http://www.linuxcounter.net
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Sebastian <news@seyweiler.dyndns.org> - 2013-12-04 20:07 +0100
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> - 2013-12-04 22:27 +0200
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Patrick Roemer <sangamon@netcologne.de> - 2013-12-05 00:38 +0100
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2013-12-04 23:45 +0000
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-12-06 13:28 -0800
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-12-14 16:46 -0500
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-12-14 03:13 -0400
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-12-14 12:03 +0000
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-12-14 17:02 -0500
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-12-15 14:33 -0400
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-12-14 17:00 -0500
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-12-15 15:05 -0400
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2013-12-17 20:09 +0100
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-12-20 22:28 -0400
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes lipska the kat <"lipskathekat at yahoo dot co dot uk"> - 2013-12-21 11:54 +0000
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-12-21 18:27 +0100
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes lipska the kat <"lipskathekat at yahoo dot co dot uk"> - 2013-12-21 18:23 +0000
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Tim Slattery <tim@risingdove.com> - 2013-12-21 14:56 -0500
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes lipska the kat <"lipskathekat at yahoo dot co dot uk"> - 2013-12-21 20:10 +0000
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes lipska the kat <"lipskathekat at yahoo dot co dot uk"> - 2013-12-21 21:18 +0000
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-12-21 14:52 -0400
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes lipska the kat <"lipskathekat at yahoo dot co dot uk"> - 2013-12-21 19:35 +0000
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-12-21 19:34 -0400
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes leif.roar@invalid.com (Leif Roar Moldskred) - 2013-12-22 05:02 -0600
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes lipska the kat <"lipskathekat at yahoo dot co dot uk"> - 2013-12-22 11:12 +0000
Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2013-12-22 21:24 +0100
csiph-web