Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #27010

Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes

Date 2013-12-21 11:54 +0000
From lipska the kat <"lipskathekat at yahoo dot co dot uk">
Organization Trollbusters 3
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes
References (1 earlier) <5yTqu.2639$oo4.861@fx02.iad> <52acd504$0$302$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <g4nru.546685$nC5.145367@fx06.iad> <MPG.2d1abfbf395d3ee22@202.177.16.121> <C17tu.56714$T27.44999@fx01.iad>
Message-ID <1Ymdndba6bj6HCjPnZ2dnUVZ8sKdnZ2d@bt.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 21/12/13 02:28, Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> On 12/17/2013 03:09 PM, Wanja Gayk wrote:
>> In article <g4nru.546685$nC5.145367@fx06.iad>, Arved Sandstrom
>> (asandstrom2@eastlink.ca) says...
>>
>>> No aspersion on the M-F 9-5 programmers, Arne. But by definition M-F 9-5
>>> programmers have made a decision - not something I will heavily
>>> criticize - to confine their work to work hours, and keep their free
>>> time for family and leisure. As such they don't spend nearly as much
>>> time on off-hours professional education (if any), and we all know that
>>> work hours don't lend themselves to professional education either.
>>
>> To put it bluntly, this is nonsense. You can't generalize like that.
>
> Sure I can generalize like that. When I refer to a programmer as a M-F
> 9-5 programmer, it's not a slur, it's a straightforward definition of a
> programmer who only practices his trade M-F 9-5.

<snip>

Who works 9-5?

I never had a job where I worked 9-5

8-6 minimum plus any unpaid overtime required to get the job done by 
release date. Then there are the nights (or small part thereof) spent in 
the company flat sleeping on the floor because some suit said we could 
do so and so by such and such and now we are working until we drop while 
he sleeps at home with his wife, or mistress.

Then there's the time spent crammed up against some herbert who could do 
with a bath, on an overcrowded train, waiting for the upline to become 
available and swotting up for the latest Java certification.

Or spending your weekends getting your head around some shitty new 
framework that some twat decided was the latest greatest waste of time 
that would look good on his CV, whilst your kids are growing up and you 
are missing the best time of their lives.

Or trying to learn some pointlessly complicated XML at 11.00pm on a 
weeknight, or ... or ... or ...

9-5 developers?
No such thing.


-- 
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer,
treacherous feline and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun
GNU/Linux user #560883 - http://www.linuxcounter.net

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Sebastian <news@seyweiler.dyndns.org> - 2013-12-04 20:07 +0100
  Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> - 2013-12-04 22:27 +0200
    Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Patrick Roemer <sangamon@netcologne.de> - 2013-12-05 00:38 +0100
    Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2013-12-04 23:45 +0000
  Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-12-06 13:28 -0800
    Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-12-14 16:46 -0500
  Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-12-14 03:13 -0400
    Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-12-14 12:03 +0000
      Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-12-14 17:02 -0500
        Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-12-15 14:33 -0400
    Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-12-14 17:00 -0500
      Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-12-15 15:05 -0400
        Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2013-12-17 20:09 +0100
          Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-12-20 22:28 -0400
            Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes lipska the kat <"lipskathekat at yahoo dot co dot uk"> - 2013-12-21 11:54 +0000
              Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-12-21 18:27 +0100
                Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes lipska the kat <"lipskathekat at yahoo dot co dot uk"> - 2013-12-21 18:23 +0000
                Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Tim Slattery <tim@risingdove.com> - 2013-12-21 14:56 -0500
                Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes lipska the kat <"lipskathekat at yahoo dot co dot uk"> - 2013-12-21 20:10 +0000
                Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes lipska the kat <"lipskathekat at yahoo dot co dot uk"> - 2013-12-21 21:18 +0000
              Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-12-21 14:52 -0400
                Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes lipska the kat <"lipskathekat at yahoo dot co dot uk"> - 2013-12-21 19:35 +0000
                Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-12-21 19:34 -0400
                Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes leif.roar@invalid.com (Leif Roar Moldskred) - 2013-12-22 05:02 -0600
                Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes lipska the kat <"lipskathekat at yahoo dot co dot uk"> - 2013-12-22 11:12 +0000
                Re: Java 8 closures vs. anonymous inner classes Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2013-12-22 21:24 +0100

csiph-web