Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #30394
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.tele2net.at!news.panservice.it!feed.xsnews.nl!border02.ams.xsnews.nl!feeder04.ams.xsnews.nl!feeder03.ams.xsnews.nl!frontend-F09-15.ams.news.kpn.nl |
|---|---|
| From | Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Could this be done better |
| Organization | Decebal Computing |
| References | <87zjbg97c5.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <m4vf1f$j03$1@dont-email.me> |
| X-Face | "(y8cC@tg_12{">GF'UXTW]FHI2wMiZNrnf'1EFQ&O#$m:f#O7+7}kR<J%a^F2lh4[N~Yz4 nSp#c+aQo1b5=?HcNEkQ7QzF<])O3X4MDL/AYjys&*mt>,v+Pti8=Vi/Z"g^?b"E |
| X-Homepage | http://www.decebal.nl/ |
| Date | Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:45:53 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <87ppcc8s3i.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> (permalink) |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:PGSQauzqSfQY+QJq+cz0yURisnE= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Lines | 183 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 77.171.42.144 |
| X-Trace | 1416848337 news.kpn.nl 21177 77.171.42.144@kpn/77.171.42.144:52363 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:30394 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Op Monday 24 Nov 2014 15:23 CET schreef Eric Sosman:
> On 11/24/2014 6:16 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> I have mostly programmed back-ends. But I now want also to do some
>> front-end programming.
>>
>> I wrote the following simple program. It does nothing useful, it
>> just displays a description in different colours with the colour
>> appended to the description.
>>
>> I was just wondering if this could be done better. Especially
>> ‘updateColour’. First I did not removed the text, but then I could
>> see the colour changing before the text was changed. This way I
>> find more pleasing and I do not notice that the text disappears.
>
> One rather important point you've overlooked: Swing is (mostly)
> not thread-safe. Swing methods should only be invoked on the Event
> Dispatching Thread (EDT), except for the very few methods that are
> specifically documented as safe for use from other threads.
>
> Your program violates this rule in two ways:
>
> - The ColourCycling constructor builds a JFrame and invokes
> assorted methods on it, and also builds a JLabel -- but the
> constructor is called from a thread that is not the EDT.
>
> - The updateColour() method manipulates the JLabel, but is
> called from some random thread created by Timer -- again, not
> the EDT.
>
> The first problem is one of those "it almost always works
> right" issues, the kind that will not bite you -- until the demo
> for the Big Boss and the Big Customer. (Sun themselves did not
> at first realize it was a problem, and many early Swing examples
> illustrated exactly the same mistake you've made.) Fortunately,
> it's easy to fix: Use the SwingUtilities.invokeLater() method to
> run the ColourCycling constructor on the EDT instead of on the
> initial thread. (For clarity's sake, I'd suggest moving the
> JLabel construction inside the ColourCycling constructor, too:
> That's where the byte code winds up, but let's be explicit, OK?)
Done.
> The second problem is (most likely) the cause of the strange
> display glitches you refer to: You're updating the display from
> a non-EDT thread, and the EDT doesn't "know" right away that things
> have changed. There are at least two ways to cure it:
>
> - Inside the TimerTask, use SwingUtilities.invokeLater() to
> launch a Runnable that calls updateColour(), so that the call runs
> on the EDT instead of on the Timer's thread.
I choose for this solution: was the easiest to do. ;-)
> - Use javax.swing.Timer instead of java.util.Timer. The
> mechanics are a bit different -- you write an ActionListener
> instead of subclassing TimerTask -- but the action listener
> automatically runs on the EDT, where it's safe to manipulate
> your GUI.
Or is there a reason why did would be better?
It looks OK now. The code has become:
import java.awt.*;
import java.util.*;
import javax.swing.*;
@SuppressWarnings("serial")
public class ColourCycling extends JFrame {
// public functions
public ColourCycling() {
java.util.Timer colourTimer = new java.util.Timer();
getContentPane().setBackground(background);
setLayout(new GridBagLayout());
label = new JLabel(description + " : " + "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX");
label.setFont(new Font("serif", Font.BOLD, 25));
add(label);
pack();
setSize(getWidth(), 3 * getHeight());
label.setBackground(background);
updateColour(getCurrentColour());
colourTimer.schedule(new SwitchColour(), delay, delay);
setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
setTitle(description);
setVisible(true);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
new ColourCycling();
}
});
}
// private classes
private class Colour {
// public
public Colour(Color color, String description) {
this.color = color;
this.description = description;
}
public Color getColor() {
return color;
}
public String getDescription() {
return description;
}
// private
private Color color;
private String description;
}
private class SwitchColour extends TimerTask {
public void run() {
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
updateColour(getNextColour());
}
});
}
}
//private functions
private Colour getCurrentColour() {
return colours[currentColour];
}
private Colour getNextColour() {
currentColour = (currentColour + 1) % colours.length;
return getCurrentColour();
}
private void updateColour(Colour newColour) {
label.setForeground(newColour.getColor());
label.setText(description + " : " + newColour.getDescription());
}
// private variables
private Color background = Color.lightGray;
private Colour[] colours = new Colour[] {
new Colour(Color.blue, "Blue"),
new Colour(Color.red, "Red"),
new Colour(Color.orange, "Orange"),
new Colour(Color.yellow, "Yellow"),
new Colour(Color.green, "Green"),
new Colour(Color.cyan, "Cyan"),
new Colour(Color.magenta, "Magenta"),
new Colour(new Color(0x9C, 0x5D, 0x52), "Brown"),
};
private int currentColour = 0;
private int delay = 4000;
private String description = "JTextArea Color Change Example";
private JLabel label;
}
By the way, the reason I use:
@SuppressWarnings("serial")
is that I compile with:
javac -Xlint ColourCycling.java
Well, I need to make a more interesting program.
> Recommended reading:
>
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/uiswing/concurrency/index.html
My reading list just became a little bigger again. :-D
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-24 12:16 +0100
Re: Could this be done better "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 22:49 +1100
Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-24 17:54 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-11-24 09:37 -0800
Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-24 19:27 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-24 09:23 -0500
Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-24 17:45 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-24 13:42 -0500
Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-25 00:12 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-11-24 09:19 -0800
Re: Could this be done better Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-11-24 09:41 -0800
Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-25 00:55 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-25 00:11 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-11-24 16:26 -0800
Re: Could this be done better Brixomatic <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-25 19:58 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-25 14:36 -0500
Re: Could this be done better Brixomatic <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-26 01:58 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-26 08:48 -0500
Re: Could this be done better Brixomatic <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-29 19:43 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-29 15:44 -0500
Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-29 15:47 -0500
csiph-web