Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #30451
| From | Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Could this be done better |
| Date | 2014-11-29 15:47 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <m5dbd2$ut7$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <m52log$vq4$1@dont-email.me> <MPG.2edf4429f6d89e3698969a@news.aioe.org> <m54lnv$e8r$1@dont-email.me> <MPG.2ee4321c5608784998969c@news.aioe.org> <m5db6g$ut7$1@dont-email.me> |
On 11/29/2014 3:44 PM, Eric Sosman wrote:
> On 11/29/2014 1:43 PM, Brixomatic wrote:
>> In article <m54lnv$e8r$1@dont-email.me>, Eric Sosman (esosman@comcast-
>> dot-net.invalid) says...
>>
>>>> Are you really trying to nitpick on American vs. English spelling?
>>>
>>> I'm merely saying that "Colour" is not "the same as an API class."
>>> Nor do I think "Colour" and "Color" would be easily confused: Whether
>>> one is Left- or Right-Pondian, one will read smoothly while the other
>>> will jar, and neither is likely to be mistaken for the other.
>>
>> Assuming your code is only read by native speakers is, erm, brave.
>
> Well, then we get to the question of "How different should names
> be in order that non-native readers won't confuse them?" And perhaps
> we might consult the Java API itself for some guidance. Therein, I
> find two classes named AclEntry, two named Action, two named
> AlreadyBoundException, two named Annotation, two named AnySeqHelper,
> two named Array, two named ArrayType, two named AttributeSet, two named
> AuthenticationException, *three* named Attributes, *three* named
> AttributeList, *four* named Attributes ...
Sorry: The four are named Attribute; only three are named
Attributes.
--
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
"Don't be afraid of work. Make work afraid of you." -- TLM
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-24 12:16 +0100
Re: Could this be done better "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 22:49 +1100
Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-24 17:54 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-11-24 09:37 -0800
Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-24 19:27 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-24 09:23 -0500
Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-24 17:45 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-24 13:42 -0500
Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-25 00:12 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-11-24 09:19 -0800
Re: Could this be done better Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-11-24 09:41 -0800
Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-25 00:55 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-25 00:11 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-11-24 16:26 -0800
Re: Could this be done better Brixomatic <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-25 19:58 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-25 14:36 -0500
Re: Could this be done better Brixomatic <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-26 01:58 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-26 08:48 -0500
Re: Could this be done better Brixomatic <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-29 19:43 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-29 15:44 -0500
Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-29 15:47 -0500
csiph-web