Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #30417
| From | Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Could this be done better |
| Date | 2014-11-26 08:48 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <m54lnv$e8r$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <87zjbg97c5.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <MPG.2edeef971793d396989698@news.aioe.org> <m52log$vq4$1@dont-email.me> <MPG.2edf4429f6d89e3698969a@news.aioe.org> |
On 11/25/2014 7:58 PM, Brixomatic wrote:
> In article <m52log$vq4$1@dont-email.me>, Eric Sosman (esosman@comcast-
> dot-net.invalid) says...
>>
>> On 11/25/2014 1:58 PM, Brixomatic wrote:
>>> In article <87zjbg97c5.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl>, Cecil Westerhof
>>> (Cecil@decebal.nl) says...
>>>> [...]
>>>> // private classes
>>>> private class Colour {
>>>
>>> Lesson five: Naming a private class the same as an API class works, but
>>> is not well readable. [...]
>>
>> Have u overlooked something?
>
> Are you really trying to nitpick on American vs. English spelling?
I'm merely saying that "Colour" is not "the same as an API class."
Nor do I think "Colour" and "Color" would be easily confused: Whether
one is Left- or Right-Pondian, one will read smoothly while the other
will jar, and neither is likely to be mistaken for the other.
Let's harbour no groudges, oukay?
--
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
"Don't be afraid of work. Make work afraid of you." -- TLM
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-24 12:16 +0100
Re: Could this be done better "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 22:49 +1100
Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-24 17:54 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-11-24 09:37 -0800
Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-24 19:27 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-24 09:23 -0500
Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-24 17:45 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-24 13:42 -0500
Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-25 00:12 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-11-24 09:19 -0800
Re: Could this be done better Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-11-24 09:41 -0800
Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-25 00:55 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-25 00:11 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-11-24 16:26 -0800
Re: Could this be done better Brixomatic <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-25 19:58 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-25 14:36 -0500
Re: Could this be done better Brixomatic <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-26 01:58 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-26 08:48 -0500
Re: Could this be done better Brixomatic <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-29 19:43 +0100
Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-29 15:44 -0500
Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-29 15:47 -0500
csiph-web