Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #30398

Re: Could this be done better

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.tele2net.at!news.panservice.it!feed.xsnews.nl!border02.ams.xsnews.nl!feeder04.ams.xsnews.nl!feeder03.ams.xsnews.nl!frontend-F09-11.ams.news.kpn.nl
From	Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Could this be done better
Organization	Decebal Computing
References	<87zjbg97c5.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <m4v61d$f6t$1@speranza.aioe.org> <87lhn08rp4.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <m4vqbh$dqp$1@dont-email.me>
X-Face	"(y8cC@tg_12{">GF'UXTW]FHI2wMiZNrnf'1EFQ&O#$m:f#O7+7}kR<J%a^F2lh4[N~Yz4 nSp#c+aQo1b5=?HcNEkQ7QzF<])O3X4MDL/AYjys&*mt>,v+Pti8=Vi/Z"g^?b"E
X-Homepage	http://www.decebal.nl/
Date	Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:27:26 +0100
Message-ID	<87h9xo8ne9.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> (permalink)
User-Agent	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:rA7SWEL0ueCc0ekBrvZUCvEVsK0=
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain
Lines	13
NNTP-Posting-Host	77.171.42.144
X-Trace	1416853736 news.kpn.nl 20845 77.171.42.144@kpn/77.171.42.144:52862
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:30398

Show key headers only | View raw

Op Monday 24 Nov 2014 18:37 CET schreef Knute Johnson:

> On 11/24/2014 08:54, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> By the way: is JavaFX thread safe? Swing is not I found out.
>
> No.  Same issues I'm afraid.

Well this time I am warned. ;-)

-- 
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof

Thread

Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-24 12:16 +0100
  Re: Could this be done better "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 22:49 +1100
    Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-24 17:54 +0100
      Re: Could this be done better Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-11-24 09:37 -0800
        Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-24 19:27 +0100
  Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-24 09:23 -0500
    Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-24 17:45 +0100
      Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-24 13:42 -0500
        Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-25 00:12 +0100
    Re: Could this be done better Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-11-24 09:19 -0800
      Re: Could this be done better Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-11-24 09:41 -0800
        Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-25 00:55 +0100
      Re: Could this be done better Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2014-11-25 00:11 +0100
        Re: Could this be done better Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-11-24 16:26 -0800
  Re: Could this be done better Brixomatic <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-25 19:58 +0100
    Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-25 14:36 -0500
      Re: Could this be done better Brixomatic <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-26 01:58 +0100
        Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-26 08:48 -0500
          Re: Could this be done better Brixomatic <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-29 19:43 +0100
            Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-29 15:44 -0500
              Re: Could this be done better Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-29 15:47 -0500

csiph-web