Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #28969

Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion]

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 02:48:18 -0500, <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 5, 2014 7:17:13 PM UTC-7, Albert van der Horst wrote:

> I agree that Rod's response, especially the satellite photo of Brian's
> parents' house, was pretty creepy --- [..]

Satellite photos linked to addresses, phone numbers, and IPs are the
modern phonebook and streetmap ...  It's only creepy to those who
haven't moved into the modern era of Microsoft Streets and Trips,
Google's satellite maps, and, of course, "Big Brother."  Or, it's
creepy for those who haven't accepted or willfully ignore the NSA
and CIA spying, and illegal U.S. government TSA body scans, etc.

You've been told about posting your IP too.  Even so, you post from
your relative's IP.  Why is that Hugh?

Originally, I intended to do that to you a while ago when you were being
an ass and posting from your relatives house (Uncle?) in California.  But,
IIRC, you mentioned something about your relative being seriously ill.
So, I didn't think it would've been taken well by you, not that you  
would've
taken it well at any point in time ...  But, hitting a guy when he's down,
like when a relative has died or possibly dying, is completely tactless.
But, I'm 100% sure that had I used that on *you* instead of the other guy,
it would've resulted in a far more positive response from those present.
Some here might've even openly applauded the effort as they've done for
attacks on you in the past.  So, just remember that you were the one who
inspired such a response originally.

> [...] a new low for comp.lang.forth, which was already holding up
> the bottom for usenet behavior standards.

Lol.  Sarcasm?  This is from the guy who currently ranks in the top
spot here because he's now the  PRIMARY  person contributing to "the
bottom ... behavior ... " on c.l.f.  I only respond to people who
attack me unprovoked.  I don't initiate garbage.  Oh, I get it ...
You actually *want* the top spot.  Hilarious!  Now, you feel or think
you have to do something to outdo me.  Good luck.  Gentle applause.

> But Albert, you're pretty creepy too!
> Before Rod achieved biggest-creep status on comp.lang.forth, you held  
> that dubious distinction:
> [link]
>

I beg to differ.  Albert's a nice guy, usually.  How could you forget
John Passaniti?  I even mentioned him.  This flaming toothpick, er...,
hostile fork guy, is his dimwitted clone.

AFAIR, you've *never* complained about Albert before.  His recent bout
of PLONKs are annoying, since he PLONKs the incorrect person.  You're
supposed to PLONK the person who initiated the conflict.  That would
be "hostilefork" a.k.a. Brian Dickens, who was a hostile fork to me
without cause.  Maybe, I should've given myself a "cool" moniker first
like "violent knife" or "blunt spoon" before responding to "hostile fork".
The primary person who used PLONK is now deceased.  He PLONKed thousands
of new, innocent people posting to comp.lang.c for no reason, R.I.P.  For
Albert's sake, I hope the use of PLONK isn't cursed.  He suffered before
he passed.

But, it's easy to burst Alfred's bubble.  Everyone here noticed when
Jeff Fox and Julian Noble stopped posting.  Everyone here would notice
if Ms. Rather or Anton Ertl stopped posting.  But, no one noticed
when Bruce McFarland and Rick "rickman" Collins stopped posting, except
me apparently.  Almost no one seems to have noticed that Alex McDonald
has almost stopped posting too.  So, no one is likely to notice when
Albert van der Horst stops posting also and fades away.  Unfortunately,
the same can be said of most others here: Stephen Pelc, Bernd Paysan,
Hans "The Beez" Bezemer, Coos Haak, Marcel Hendrix, Lars Brinkhoff,
Syd Rumpo, Gerry Jackson, Paul Rubin, Paul Bennett, Arthur "Mentifex"
Murray, Julian Fondren, Assad "AKE" or "AKE" Ebrahim, Gavin "Gavino"
Schuett, C.G. Montgomery, Elliott Chapin, Chris Hinsley, Marcos Cruz,
Mark Flamer, ...  Most of you are thinking: "Who?".  I think it's
possible a few people might notice if Mark Wills or Andrew Haley
just disappeared.

> In this thread you attacked my LC53 prng, which I show here:
>
> [...]
>
> These were not honest mistakes --- you were just trying to make
> my code look like it doesn't work, when it actually does work.
>
> Eventually you admitted that my LC53 does work, due to the fact
> that I "got lucky."

So, Albert attacked you or lied, or maybe he made an honest mistake
due to anger, but where exactly does that make him a creep?

> P.S. for Brian --- I recommend that you don't post your phone number
> on the internet; these creeps are likely to call you up in the middle
> of the night and yell at you.

Hugh, his phone number, if it was actually his, was just bait.  He was
trying to get me to call so he could obtain the caller ID or ANI or have
the called traced by the phone company and/or law enforcement.  Or, at
least, he was implying that he was doing that, much like he implied
that "reasonable people" were law officers, not his parents, loser bar
friends, or more likely, his imaginary friends and plastic girlfriend.
Or, perhaps the phone number was a joke, e.g., to a mental hospital,
police station, or for one of his enemies.  Since it's an unlisted VoIP,
and the customer provided addresses for VoIPs generally aren't real, it
could be for anywhere in the world.  Of course, when a phone number is
posted in an open, worldwide forum, he, or whomever the phone number is
actually registered to, could end up with tens of thousands of callers
and phreakers, none of whom are me.  I'm not about to step into an idiot's
faulty trap.  Phone numbers, just like email addresses, IPs, etc are
harvested from Usenet posts.  The fact that he doesn't know this stuff is
truly astounding, if he has masters in electrical engineering as he claims.


Rod Pemberton

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Forth in oblivion akk <akk@nospam.org> - 2014-02-16 19:21 +0100
  Re: Forth in oblivion Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-02-16 12:03 -0800
    Re: Forth in oblivion hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-02-16 15:47 -0800
    Re: Forth in oblivion Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-03-05 15:25 +0000
  Re: Forth in oblivion visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2014-02-18 00:06 -0800
    Re: Forth in oblivion "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-02-18 06:15 -0500
      Re: Forth in oblivion visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2014-02-18 09:52 -0800
        Re: Forth in oblivion "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-02-18 18:16 -0500
          Re: Forth in oblivion visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2014-02-18 19:05 -0800
            Re: Forth in oblivion AKK <akk@nospam.org> - 2014-02-19 09:47 +0100
            Re: Forth in oblivion Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-02-19 04:08 -0600
            Re: Forth in oblivion "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-02-19 05:39 -0500
          Re: Forth in oblivion Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-02-19 04:09 -0600
            Re: Forth in oblivion "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-02-19 06:18 -0500
              Re: Forth in oblivion Stefan Mauerhofer <smauerhofer@androsoft.ch> - 2014-02-19 03:35 -0800
              Re: Forth in oblivion Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-02-20 10:06 -0600
          Re: Forth in oblivion "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <notagoodone@invalid.org.invalid> - 2014-02-23 21:17 +0000
            Re: Forth in oblivion "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-02-24 01:18 -0500
              Re: Forth in oblivion "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-02-23 21:44 -1000
                Re: Forth in oblivion hostilefork@gmail.com - 2014-03-02 04:36 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-03-03 14:30 -0500
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] hostilefork@gmail.com - 2014-03-03 15:34 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-03 16:53 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] hostilefork@gmail.com - 2014-03-03 17:10 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-03-04 10:28 +0000
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-03-03 21:05 -0500
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] hostilefork@gmail.com - 2014-03-03 18:42 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] Stefan Mauerhofer <smauerhofer@androsoft.ch> - 2014-03-03 23:54 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] hostilefork@gmail.com - 2014-03-04 13:49 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-03-04 17:23 -0500
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] hostilefork@gmail.com - 2014-03-05 04:02 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-03-05 19:01 -0500
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-03-06 02:17 +0000
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-03-06 23:48 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-03-07 17:23 -0500
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] hostilefork@gmail.com - 2014-03-08 01:37 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-03-08 20:32 -0500
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] Stefan Mauerhofer <smauerhofer@androsoft.ch> - 2014-03-04 22:15 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-03-04 16:41 -0500
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-03-04 17:06 -0500
                Re: Forth in oblivion Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-03-05 11:11 -0600
                Re: Forth in oblivion hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-03-07 21:14 -0800
  Re: Forth in oblivion albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-02-18 13:17 +0000

csiph-web