Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #28933

Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion]

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 07:02:48 -0500, <hostilefork@gmail.com> wrote:

> [snip]

Tell me, just how is it that a supposedly smart EE like you couldn't
manage to keep himself employed at MS?  That's the holy grail of
employment, isn't it?  If you truly are an EE, your education is
leaps and bounds ahead of a CS.  Despite you taking offense over me
using maps with satellite photos to view the registered location of
your IP, a product of the modern era, you still said I should go ahead
and read your resume.  That was ironic and contradictory.  I guess it
makes sense to sociopaths and mental patients and trolls.  And, you
didn't provide a link.  Well, I did find an old and partial resume of
someone which might be yours.  Same name.  Guy worked for MS.  It's
clear you valued those experiences you mentioned or you wouldn't have
mentioned them.  But, what's available of what could possibly be your
resume indicates you bailed out quickly from MS or were perhaps fired ...
The last thing on this guy's resume was some pseudo-science education
system.

> Look, everyone I've shown this thread to says the mistake I made
> is talking to you--period.

You have some serious comprehension, memory issues, and/or flawed
understanding of basic mores.

Let's review:

1) You didn't talk to me.  You responded to Ms. Rather.  She was
responding to me.  You rudely interjected with an unrelated reply
on another topic.  I didn't comment on you being rude initially.
I politely responded with real interest.  I like programming
languages.  I've looked at many of them, and I've programmed in
many of them.  C rules.

2) You insulted me first.  You called me rude when I wasn't and then
you vented your wrath upon me for no apparent reason.  It was similar
to a random stranger assaulting you in a bar for no reason.  Where did
that come from and why?  I was attempting to have a polite and serious
conversation.  I've stated that honestly at least three times now.
Even so, you insist on taking it the wrong way.  You should grow up,
be an adult for once, and apologize for your mistake.

3) You made a mistake in your post.  I responded correctly in regards
to your mistake.  You said I should read your mind and undestand what
you actually meant.  Do you understand how stupid that is?  You then
claimed I went on a tirade about executable formats.  I was discussing
your post, your claims.   You can't rewrite what was written.  It was
your mistake that I responded to.  Take responsibility for it.  Be a man.

> It's only my general desire to answer those who outreach to me
> that leads me to respond.

No one outreached to you.  You outreached to us.  You did so
inappropriately too.

Ignoring others unless they show interest in your activities in life
is a trait of a sociopath.

> And like I said, you apparently have a lot more interest in me
> than I do in you.

Most people have sympathy, empathy, compassion, and curiosity in regards
to others, whether they like them or not.  Saying you don't, means your
a sociopath or psychopath, a hardened criminal, a cold blooded murderer,
or maybe an autistic.  All of them have mental problems.  I seriously
don't understand how you can make that claim about not caring for people
nd also claim you don't have mental problems.  Even stoic, highly
introverted, non-people persons care about others.

> You clearly need help, [...]

I don't need help.  I would like an apology.

You started this.  You insulted me without cause.  Then, you lied
about it.  Failure to recognize this indicates it's you who needs
help.  How many times do I have to state my position and the recorded
truth before you recognize it as such?  Non-comprehension, rejection,
distancing, ...  AISI, psychologists would have a "field day"
discussing you.

> [...] and I'm worried that people who need help and to whom the
> world says "ignore" might get lost.  See also:
>
> [unrelated link]
>

It seems you have utterly failed to understand exactly where you're
sending your posts.  This is NOT a Google Group.  It is NOT setup
by Google.  Google has no control over the content.  This is a Usenet
group.  It's hosted on tens of thousands of Usenet servers around
the world.  The posts are archived forever.  This is also an
unmoderated Usenet forum.  There is no one here who is able to
filter or ban people.  So, when you act up, as you did, you get to
take the heat for it, depending on the other party, which is me
in this case.

Anyway, in this scenario, you'd be the troll.  My belief is that
you actually posted with the intent to incite me.  That's why you
responded to Ms. Rather, who was responding to me, instead of
starting a new thread on Rebol, which would've been appropriate.
That's why you're refusing to apologize.

> I don't like that answer to "problem children".

Yes, a "problem child" would be you.  Be mature.  Accept it.  Apologize.
It was your mistake and your insult that started all this.

FYI, denial of reality or distancing from yourself from your actions
is another trait of sociopaths and criminals.

> Yet that's the answer that "reasonable" people tell me I should take.

Who is "reasonable"?  Who defines "resonable" for a given situation?

The world is full of assholes and alcoholics.  You're clearly in the
asshole category, presently.  If it's true that "birds of a feather
flock together", then the "reasonable people" you supposedly consulted
are likely just as biased as you and/or uninformed.

> I like to think I'm the person who is brave enough to test the
> waters a little, at some personal risk--(apparently, given your
> satellite stalking of my parents).

Viewing maps or satellite imagery does not constitute stalking,
nor does knowing your name, nor does knowing your address, birth,
family members, salary, occupation, no more than does looking up
someone's address in the whitepages.  The information is readily
available from your IP to *everyone*, and/or provided via Google.
You posted your IP freely, thereby providing a street address.  By
doing so, by posting your IP, whether you were informed of it or
not by Google, who had a legal responsibility to tell you they
posted it, you legally gave us - everyone here - permission to use
that information and any or all related legally obtainable
information as I or anyone else here sees fit.  Posting your IP is
no different than if you posted a home phone number or home address.
Thank you for granting us the right to use it.  I.e., you have
NO legal standing for any veiled threats you make.

The problem here is you're still focusing on the wrong things.
You should be focusing on your own ignorance of posting your IP
to the internet and your security.  A smart EE shouldn't do
something so dumb, and do so repeatedly as you've done.  What EE
doesn't know how to obscure his IP?  It's a mistake to focus on
what I and everyone else is capable of doing with your IP.  And,
I politely told you how to *fix* the problem.  Of course, a
troll and sociopaths are not concerned with what they should be.

> This has nothing to do with Forth, [...]

That's correct.  Nothing at all that you've posted here has
anything to do with Forth.  So, just why are you posting here?

> [...] just your mental problems.

I don't have any mental problems that I'm aware of.  No one
IRL has ever informed me of any they surmised either.  I would
hope that my loved ones would've said something to me directly,
if they believed I was mentally defective.  And, I'm fully aware
that if they thought I needed help, they would encourage me to
seek it and/or provide it.  You only need two signatures in
most civilized countries to have someone committed to a mental
institution.

So, AFAICT, it's just you projecting your mental issues onto others.
I'm truly surprised no one IRL has ever brought this topic up
with you.  Surely, someone in your personal life must've discussed
you being a sociopath.  You must've angered many people over the
years with your lack of understanding, empathy, or compassion for
others, your mistreatment of others, your failure to recognize
boundaries both territorial and personal, your intense selfishness
or ruthless pursuits without regards for others, and your inability
to grasp common societal mores, such as not insulting others for
comments made in good faith or intentionally inciting anger, as
you just did.

> If you want to talk to me, fucking grow a pair and call
> me on the phone.

Why would I do that when I can post here for almost nothing?
International phone charges are expensive.  Don't you know that?
You claimed that you're an EE.  What EE doesn't know about
telephone systems and the internet?  With statements like that,
I'd swear that you truly are dumb, and not a *true* EE.


Rod Pemberton

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Forth in oblivion akk <akk@nospam.org> - 2014-02-16 19:21 +0100
  Re: Forth in oblivion Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-02-16 12:03 -0800
    Re: Forth in oblivion hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-02-16 15:47 -0800
    Re: Forth in oblivion Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-03-05 15:25 +0000
  Re: Forth in oblivion visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2014-02-18 00:06 -0800
    Re: Forth in oblivion "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-02-18 06:15 -0500
      Re: Forth in oblivion visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2014-02-18 09:52 -0800
        Re: Forth in oblivion "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-02-18 18:16 -0500
          Re: Forth in oblivion visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2014-02-18 19:05 -0800
            Re: Forth in oblivion AKK <akk@nospam.org> - 2014-02-19 09:47 +0100
            Re: Forth in oblivion Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-02-19 04:08 -0600
            Re: Forth in oblivion "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-02-19 05:39 -0500
          Re: Forth in oblivion Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-02-19 04:09 -0600
            Re: Forth in oblivion "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-02-19 06:18 -0500
              Re: Forth in oblivion Stefan Mauerhofer <smauerhofer@androsoft.ch> - 2014-02-19 03:35 -0800
              Re: Forth in oblivion Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-02-20 10:06 -0600
          Re: Forth in oblivion "Stanley Daniel de Liver" <notagoodone@invalid.org.invalid> - 2014-02-23 21:17 +0000
            Re: Forth in oblivion "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-02-24 01:18 -0500
              Re: Forth in oblivion "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-02-23 21:44 -1000
                Re: Forth in oblivion hostilefork@gmail.com - 2014-03-02 04:36 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-03-03 14:30 -0500
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] hostilefork@gmail.com - 2014-03-03 15:34 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-03 16:53 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] hostilefork@gmail.com - 2014-03-03 17:10 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-03-04 10:28 +0000
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-03-03 21:05 -0500
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] hostilefork@gmail.com - 2014-03-03 18:42 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] Stefan Mauerhofer <smauerhofer@androsoft.ch> - 2014-03-03 23:54 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] hostilefork@gmail.com - 2014-03-04 13:49 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-03-04 17:23 -0500
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] hostilefork@gmail.com - 2014-03-05 04:02 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-03-05 19:01 -0500
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-03-06 02:17 +0000
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-03-06 23:48 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-03-07 17:23 -0500
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] hostilefork@gmail.com - 2014-03-08 01:37 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-03-08 20:32 -0500
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] Stefan Mauerhofer <smauerhofer@androsoft.ch> - 2014-03-04 22:15 -0800
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-03-04 16:41 -0500
                Re: Rebol, Red, Haxe languages, was [Re: Forth in oblivion] "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-03-04 17:06 -0500
                Re: Forth in oblivion Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-03-05 11:11 -0600
                Re: Forth in oblivion hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-03-07 21:14 -0800
  Re: Forth in oblivion albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-02-18 13:17 +0000

csiph-web