Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #58059
| From | Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA |
| Date | 2017-04-24 23:35 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <odmjfo$5cm$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <2d964dc4-d836-4a4d-88f8-6683c57bf6b4@googlegroups.com> <0e9bc827-50b8-4544-82ef-6949d9688f0b@googlegroups.com> <a4e0eb09-f8de-454e-9bea-8216636ad11c@googlegroups.com> |
On 4/24/2017 11:24 PM, foxaudioresearch@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 12:12:14 AM UTC-4, hughag...@gmail.com wrote: >> On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 6:12:02 PM UTC-7, foxaudio...@gmail.com wrote: >>> We need open source cars, tractors and well... everything now. >> >> I consider open-source software to be a disturbing development --- this is basically Marxism --- do we really want computer programming to be a service industry in which programmers charge for their time but they do not own the fruits of their labor? > > I guess it could be seen that way. But when you code for a corporation you don't own the code either. Is that Marxism in disguise? All we did was create a > pretend entity in law called the corporation and the result is the same to the coder. > > (just rolling your idea around) > > B > He gets paid a salary for his work, and he knows up front who will own the software it's up to him to make the decision with Marxism there is no decision to make, you do as you are told. -- Cecil - k5nwa
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-24 18:12 -0700
Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-24 19:08 -0700
Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-04-24 21:22 -0500
Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-24 21:06 -0700
Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-24 22:00 -0700
Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-25 01:48 -0400
Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-24 21:12 -0700
Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-24 21:24 -0700
Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-24 21:27 -0700
Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-04-24 23:35 -0500
Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-04-24 23:32 -0500
Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-25 01:54 -0400
Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-04-25 01:10 -0500
Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-25 12:20 -0400
Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2017-04-25 02:12 -0700
Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA lehs <skydda.barnen@gmail.com> - 2017-04-25 04:51 -0700
Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-26 03:42 -0500
Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-25 07:39 +0000
Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-25 12:33 -0400
Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-26 14:57 +0000
Re: Software Could Re-define Ownership in the USA rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-26 12:22 -0400
csiph-web