Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #56081

Re: When to use !name vs. name! ?

From "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: When to use !name vs. name! ?
Date 2017-03-22 19:49 +1100
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <oatdmk$aqq$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <oakpjr$lf6$1@dont-email.me> <oan19q$12u3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <170lq1srs0rqt$.p4ckv826gjru.dlg@40tude.net> <oapudj$icj$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ykyhp10ac44f$.1ov0maneuxnh$.dlg@40tude.net>

Show all headers | View raw


Coos Haak wrote:
> Op Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:10:16 +1100 schreef HAA:
>
> > Coos Haak wrote:
> >> Op Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:41:11 +1100 schreef HAA:
> >>> ...
> >>> If it is advantageous for trivial functions to have names indicative of the stack
> >>> effect - is it not also advantageous to differentiate functions that are not simple
> >>> or indicative?  Forth has GET-ORDER SET-ORDER not ORDER@ ORDER!
> >>> because ORDER is a concept, not a memory location.
> >>
> >> Forths with the SEARCH WORDLIST have GET-ORDER and SET-ORDER
> >> They deliver or store a structure consisting of wid's and a number.
> >> I have seen implementations that had ORDER@ and ORDER!
> >> Those were synonyms of (FigForth) CONTEXT @ and CONTEXT ! respectively.
> >
> > CONTEXT was a simple variable where a trailing @/! operator was appropriate.
> > GET/SET-ORDER reflects a more complex function where the emphasis is on
> > the action, not the object.
> >
> >> Another example. I have a pointer that gives its value by saying
> >> MYPTR and setting to another value by >MYPTR .
> >> The first is used more often, so writing of MYPTR> is distracting.
> >>
> >> groet Coos
> >
> > The opposite of >MYPTR would typically be named <MYPTR.  Relevant here is
> > how the action (to/from) precedes the object.
>
> The opposite of >R is R>. The action follows the object here.
> I've seen very old Forth that had <R.
>
> groet Coos

You have described several conventions including examples where they
contradicted, your own among them.  What is your point?




Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

When to use  !name  vs.  name! ? "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-03-14 11:15 +1100
  Re: When to use  !name  vs.  name! ? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-03-13 18:27 -0700
    Re: When to use  !name  vs.  name! ? Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 01:33 -0700
  Re: When to use  !name  vs.  name! ? Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 01:30 -0700
  When to use  !name  vs.  name! ? NN <november.nihal@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 02:56 -0700
    Re: When to use  !name  vs.  name! ? "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-03-16 08:59 +1100
      Re: When to use  !name  vs.  name! ? Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 02:11 -0700
        Re: When to use  !name  vs.  name! ? "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-03-17 11:19 +1100
  Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 20:46 -0400
    Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-03-16 21:34 -1000
      Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-03-18 09:49 +1100
        Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-03-17 13:08 -1000
          Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 19:35 -0400
            Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 00:51 -0700
            Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-03-19 10:47 +1100
              Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 22:18 -0400
                Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-03-18 16:36 -1000
                Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 23:53 -0400
                Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-03-18 22:22 -1000
                Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-03-19 16:03 +0000
                Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-03-19 17:42 +0000
                Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-03-19 13:10 -1000
                Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-03-19 13:34 +0100
                Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-03-19 16:23 +0000
                Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-03-19 20:47 +0100
                Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-03-20 03:47 -0500
                Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-03-20 09:41 +1100
                Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? Coos Haak <htrofhc@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 01:24 +0100
                Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-03-21 12:10 +1100
                Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-03-20 18:45 -0700
                Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? Coos Haak <htrofhc@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 14:58 +0100
                Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-03-22 19:49 +1100
          Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-03-17 16:46 -0700
  Re: When to use  !name  vs.  name! ? Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2017-04-12 08:13 +0200

csiph-web