Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #56081
| From | "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? |
| Date | 2017-03-22 19:49 +1100 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <oatdmk$aqq$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <oakpjr$lf6$1@dont-email.me> <oan19q$12u3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <170lq1srs0rqt$.p4ckv826gjru.dlg@40tude.net> <oapudj$icj$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ykyhp10ac44f$.1ov0maneuxnh$.dlg@40tude.net> |
Coos Haak wrote: > Op Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:10:16 +1100 schreef HAA: > > > Coos Haak wrote: > >> Op Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:41:11 +1100 schreef HAA: > >>> ... > >>> If it is advantageous for trivial functions to have names indicative of the stack > >>> effect - is it not also advantageous to differentiate functions that are not simple > >>> or indicative? Forth has GET-ORDER SET-ORDER not ORDER@ ORDER! > >>> because ORDER is a concept, not a memory location. > >> > >> Forths with the SEARCH WORDLIST have GET-ORDER and SET-ORDER > >> They deliver or store a structure consisting of wid's and a number. > >> I have seen implementations that had ORDER@ and ORDER! > >> Those were synonyms of (FigForth) CONTEXT @ and CONTEXT ! respectively. > > > > CONTEXT was a simple variable where a trailing @/! operator was appropriate. > > GET/SET-ORDER reflects a more complex function where the emphasis is on > > the action, not the object. > > > >> Another example. I have a pointer that gives its value by saying > >> MYPTR and setting to another value by >MYPTR . > >> The first is used more often, so writing of MYPTR> is distracting. > >> > >> groet Coos > > > > The opposite of >MYPTR would typically be named <MYPTR. Relevant here is > > how the action (to/from) precedes the object. > > The opposite of >R is R>. The action follows the object here. > I've seen very old Forth that had <R. > > groet Coos You have described several conventions including examples where they contradicted, your own among them. What is your point?
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
When to use !name vs. name! ? "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-03-14 11:15 +1100
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-03-13 18:27 -0700
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 01:33 -0700
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 01:30 -0700
When to use !name vs. name! ? NN <november.nihal@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 02:56 -0700
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-03-16 08:59 +1100
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 02:11 -0700
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-03-17 11:19 +1100
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 20:46 -0400
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-03-16 21:34 -1000
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-03-18 09:49 +1100
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-03-17 13:08 -1000
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 19:35 -0400
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 00:51 -0700
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-03-19 10:47 +1100
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 22:18 -0400
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-03-18 16:36 -1000
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 23:53 -0400
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-03-18 22:22 -1000
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-03-19 16:03 +0000
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-03-19 17:42 +0000
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-03-19 13:10 -1000
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-03-19 13:34 +0100
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-03-19 16:23 +0000
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-03-19 20:47 +0100
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-03-20 03:47 -0500
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-03-20 09:41 +1100
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? Coos Haak <htrofhc@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 01:24 +0100
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-03-21 12:10 +1100
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-03-20 18:45 -0700
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? Coos Haak <htrofhc@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 14:58 +0100
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-03-22 19:49 +1100
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-03-17 16:46 -0700
Re: When to use !name vs. name! ? Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2017-04-12 08:13 +0200
csiph-web