Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #96821 > unrolled thread

"netiquette" vs "conduct"

Started by"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
First post2016-11-18 21:43 +0800
Last post2016-11-20 17:41 +1100
Articles 9 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c

Contents

  "netiquette" vs "conduct" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 21:43 +0800
    Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-11-18 10:32 -0500
    Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2016-11-18 15:49 +0000
      Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 23:52 +0800
        Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2016-11-18 17:24 +0000
    Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-11-18 13:27 -0500
    Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" "Don Phillipson" <e925@SPAMBLOCK.ncf.ca> - 2016-11-18 17:27 -0500
      Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-19 11:00 +0800
    Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" "Peter \"Shaggy\" Haywood" <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2016-11-20 17:41 +1100

#96821 — "netiquette" vs "conduct"

From"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-18 21:43 +0800
Subject"netiquette" vs "conduct"
Message-ID<o0n0hb$s26$4@dont-email.me>
Differences?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#96845

FromJerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Date2016-11-18 10:32 -0500
Message-ID<o0n6to$kks$1@jstuckle.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#96821
On 11/18/2016 8:43 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
> 
> Differences?

 Ask in an appropriate newsgroup.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#96851

FromJohn Gordon <gordon@panix.com>
Date2016-11-18 15:49 +0000
Message-ID<o0n7ut$rsb$1@reader2.panix.com>
In reply to#96821
In <o0n0hb$s26$4@dont-email.me> "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> writes:


> Differences?

Conduct can mean almost any aspect of behavior, while netiquette focuses
on electronic communications.

-- 
John Gordon                   A is for Amy, who fell down the stairs
gordon@panix.com              B is for Basil, assaulted by bears
                                -- Edward Gorey, "The Gashlycrumb Tinies"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#96852

From"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-18 23:52 +0800
Message-ID<o0n82i$ole$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#96851
On 18/11/2016 11:49 PM, John Gordon wrote:
> In <o0n0hb$s26$4@dont-email.me> "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> writes:
>> Differences?
>
> Conduct can mean almost any aspect of behavior, while netiquette focuses
> on electronic communications.

Why would one have multiple "conduct" in different time and place?

Schizophrenia? Multiple personality or email address? Disguise? Masks? 
Come on... crap! :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#96867

FromJohn Gordon <gordon@panix.com>
Date2016-11-18 17:24 +0000
Message-ID<o0ndg0$7ul$1@reader2.panix.com>
In reply to#96852
In <o0n82i$ole$2@dont-email.me> "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> writes:

> On 18/11/2016 11:49 PM, John Gordon wrote:
> > In <o0n0hb$s26$4@dont-email.me> "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> writes:
> >> Differences?
> >
> > Conduct can mean almost any aspect of behavior, while netiquette focuses
> > on electronic communications.

> Why would one have multiple "conduct" in different time and place?

Just to pick one obvious example:

Electronic communications are not face-to-face so behaviors such as body
language, speech patterns, dress, and even personal hygiene are totally
disregarded.

But the much more general term "conduct" could possibly be interpreted
to include those factors.

-- 
John Gordon                   A is for Amy, who fell down the stairs
gordon@panix.com              B is for Basil, assaulted by bears
                                -- Edward Gorey, "The Gashlycrumb Tinies"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#96875

FromKen Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net>
Date2016-11-18 13:27 -0500
Message-ID<o0nh5t$rdl$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#96821
On 11/18/2016 8:43 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
>
> Differences?

In C, the binary operator "-" will give you the difference between two 
numbers, or two pointers.

-- 
Kenneth Brody

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#96912

From"Don Phillipson" <e925@SPAMBLOCK.ncf.ca>
Date2016-11-18 17:27 -0500
Message-ID<o0o0c2$jim$2@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#96821
"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:o0n0hb$s26$4@dont-email.me...

> Differences?

Netiquette and etiquette are rules.  Conduct is behavior.
-- 
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#96922

From"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-19 11:00 +0800
Message-ID<o0of6v$jvm$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#96912
On 19/11/2016 6:27 AM, Don Phillipson wrote:
> "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:o0n0hb$s26$4@dont-email.me...
>
>> Differences?
>
> Netiquette and etiquette are rules.  Conduct is behavior.
>

<Japanese>saw</Japanese>, Master!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#97545

From"Peter \"Shaggy\" Haywood" <phaywood@alphalink.com.au>
Date2016-11-20 17:41 +1100
Message-ID<55t7gd-sc5.ln1@walter.foo>
In reply to#96821
Squaresville clown Mr. Man-wai Chang was jivin' in comp.lang.c on Sat,
19 Nov 2016 12:43 am. It's a bum scene! Dig it.

> Differences?

  Gophers?

  Now would you like to pose a valid question, to a single newsgroup or
small number of related newsgroups, about the topic of that/those
newsgroup/newsgroups, in plain English or whatever the (common)
language of the newsgroup/newsgroups is, in the body of your post?

-- 


----- Dig the NEW and IMPROVED news sig!! -----


-------------- Shaggy was here! ---------------
              Ain't I'm a dawg!!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c

csiph-web