Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct"

Message-Id	<55t7gd-sc5.ln1@walter.foo>
From	"Peter \"Shaggy\" Haywood" <phaywood@alphalink.com.au>
Subject	Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct"
Newsgroups	alt.english.usage, comp.lang.c, alt.usenet, alt.conspiracy
Followup-To	alt.english.usage
Date	2016-11-20 17:41 +1100
References	<o0n0hb$s26$4@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Followups directed to: alt.english.usage

Show all headers | View raw

Squaresville clown Mr. Man-wai Chang was jivin' in comp.lang.c on Sat,
19 Nov 2016 12:43 am. It's a bum scene! Dig it.

> Differences?

  Gophers?

  Now would you like to pose a valid question, to a single newsgroup or
small number of related newsgroups, about the topic of that/those
newsgroup/newsgroups, in plain English or whatever the (common)
language of the newsgroup/newsgroups is, in the body of your post?

-- 


----- Dig the NEW and IMPROVED news sig!! -----


-------------- Shaggy was here! ---------------
              Ain't I'm a dawg!!

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

"netiquette" vs "conduct" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 21:43 +0800
  Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-11-18 10:32 -0500
  Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2016-11-18 15:49 +0000
    Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 23:52 +0800
      Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2016-11-18 17:24 +0000
  Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-11-18 13:27 -0500
  Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" "Don Phillipson" <e925@SPAMBLOCK.ncf.ca> - 2016-11-18 17:27 -0500
    Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-19 11:00 +0800
  Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" "Peter \"Shaggy\" Haywood" <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2016-11-20 17:41 +1100

csiph-web