Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #96851

Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct"

From John Gordon <gordon@panix.com>
Newsgroups alt.english.usage, comp.lang.c, alt.usenet, alt.conspiracy
Subject Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct"
Date 2016-11-18 15:49 +0000
Organization PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID <o0n7ut$rsb$1@reader2.panix.com> (permalink)
References <o0n0hb$s26$4@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


In <o0n0hb$s26$4@dont-email.me> "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> writes:


> Differences?

Conduct can mean almost any aspect of behavior, while netiquette focuses
on electronic communications.

-- 
John Gordon                   A is for Amy, who fell down the stairs
gordon@panix.com              B is for Basil, assaulted by bears
                                -- Edward Gorey, "The Gashlycrumb Tinies"

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

"netiquette" vs "conduct" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 21:43 +0800
  Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-11-18 10:32 -0500
  Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2016-11-18 15:49 +0000
    Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 23:52 +0800
      Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2016-11-18 17:24 +0000
  Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-11-18 13:27 -0500
  Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" "Don Phillipson" <e925@SPAMBLOCK.ncf.ca> - 2016-11-18 17:27 -0500
    Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-19 11:00 +0800
  Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" "Peter \"Shaggy\" Haywood" <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2016-11-20 17:41 +1100

csiph-web