Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.english.usage, comp.lang.c, alt.usenet, alt.conspiracy |
| Subject | Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" |
| Date | 2016-11-18 17:24 +0000 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <o0ndg0$7ul$1@reader2.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <o0n0hb$s26$4@dont-email.me> <o0n7ut$rsb$1@reader2.panix.com> <o0n82i$ole$2@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
In <o0n82i$ole$2@dont-email.me> "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> writes:
> On 18/11/2016 11:49 PM, John Gordon wrote:
> > In <o0n0hb$s26$4@dont-email.me> "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> writes:
> >> Differences?
> >
> > Conduct can mean almost any aspect of behavior, while netiquette focuses
> > on electronic communications.
> Why would one have multiple "conduct" in different time and place?
Just to pick one obvious example:
Electronic communications are not face-to-face so behaviors such as body
language, speech patterns, dress, and even personal hygiene are totally
disregarded.
But the much more general term "conduct" could possibly be interpreted
to include those factors.
--
John Gordon A is for Amy, who fell down the stairs
gordon@panix.com B is for Basil, assaulted by bears
-- Edward Gorey, "The Gashlycrumb Tinies"
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"netiquette" vs "conduct" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 21:43 +0800
Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-11-18 10:32 -0500
Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2016-11-18 15:49 +0000
Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 23:52 +0800
Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2016-11-18 17:24 +0000
Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-11-18 13:27 -0500
Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" "Don Phillipson" <e925@SPAMBLOCK.ncf.ca> - 2016-11-18 17:27 -0500
Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-19 11:00 +0800
Re: "netiquette" vs "conduct" "Peter \"Shaggy\" Haywood" <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2016-11-20 17:41 +1100
csiph-web