Re: lcc-win

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: lcc-win
Date	Fri, 12 Aug 2011 08:50:59 +1200
Lines	24
Message-ID	<9aitlkFjsaU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<j20kj4$efl$1@speranza.aioe.org> <5b596b68-1a29-4ff3-94f5-54c10d8b1c18@hl8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <j214f8$mme$1@speranza.aioe.org> <Xns9F3EE1E888995dammel@y2plugh.fqdn.th-h.de>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	individual.net XkZ3EnctTN/byhKtqui7nQ5qxCUFpidoJagMeCQjt4Wx3h5Vwj
Cancel-Lock	sha1:WOJaX0u/4KjcOuQ2xhFMrilq0oY=
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20101021 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4
In-Reply-To	<Xns9F3EE1E888995dammel@y2plugh.fqdn.th-h.de>
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c:9231

Show key headers only | View raw

On 08/12/11 08:12 AM, Ralf Damaschke wrote:
> jacob navia<jacob@spamsink.net>  wrote:
>
>> None of my extensions affects strictly conforming programs. I have
>> never added ANY keyword, nor a reserved identifier.
>>
>> I have repeated this countless times since several YEARS but you
>> (and your friends) ALWAYS bring up the same WRONG argument.
>
> May be because even an eternal repetition of your argument does not
> make it true. I remember to have seen here reports that lcc-win
> deliberately copies declarations of standard functions to standard
> headers they do not belong to, and pollutes the user name space
> with proprietary macro and function names. All of these "extensions"
> will prevent a specific strictly conforming program from being
> compiled.

Why are you bashing a tool you haven't used?  Jacob has also repeatedly 
stated that those extensions are disabled in conforming mode.

Can you name a compiler that is strictly conforming in its default mode?

-- 
Ian Collins

Thread

lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-11 15:14 +0200
  Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-11 07:51 -0700
    Re: lcc-win James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-11 11:23 -0400
      Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-11 08:35 -0700
        Re: lcc-win James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-11 12:28 -0400
          Re: lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-11 11:46 -0700
            Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-12 10:20 -0700
              Re: lcc-win James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-12 14:00 -0400
                Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-12 11:23 -0700
                Re: lcc-win blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2011-08-12 11:36 -0700
                Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-12 11:42 -0700
                Re: lcc-win Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-08-12 11:52 -0700
                Re: lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-12 20:37 +0200
    Re: lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-11 19:45 +0200
      Re: lcc-win Ralf Damaschke <rwspam@gmx.de> - 2011-08-11 20:12 +0000
        Re: lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-11 22:43 +0200
        Re: lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-11 13:43 -0700
        Re: lcc-win Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-12 08:50 +1200
    Re: lcc-win gordonb.04sy5@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2011-08-12 19:54 -0500

csiph-web