Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: lcc-win |
| Date | 2011-08-12 08:50 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <9aitlkFjsaU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <j20kj4$efl$1@speranza.aioe.org> <5b596b68-1a29-4ff3-94f5-54c10d8b1c18@hl8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <j214f8$mme$1@speranza.aioe.org> <Xns9F3EE1E888995dammel@y2plugh.fqdn.th-h.de> |
On 08/12/11 08:12 AM, Ralf Damaschke wrote: > jacob navia<jacob@spamsink.net> wrote: > >> None of my extensions affects strictly conforming programs. I have >> never added ANY keyword, nor a reserved identifier. >> >> I have repeated this countless times since several YEARS but you >> (and your friends) ALWAYS bring up the same WRONG argument. > > May be because even an eternal repetition of your argument does not > make it true. I remember to have seen here reports that lcc-win > deliberately copies declarations of standard functions to standard > headers they do not belong to, and pollutes the user name space > with proprietary macro and function names. All of these "extensions" > will prevent a specific strictly conforming program from being > compiled. Why are you bashing a tool you haven't used? Jacob has also repeatedly stated that those extensions are disabled in conforming mode. Can you name a compiler that is strictly conforming in its default mode? -- Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-11 15:14 +0200
Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-11 07:51 -0700
Re: lcc-win James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-11 11:23 -0400
Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-11 08:35 -0700
Re: lcc-win James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-11 12:28 -0400
Re: lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-11 11:46 -0700
Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-12 10:20 -0700
Re: lcc-win James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-12 14:00 -0400
Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-12 11:23 -0700
Re: lcc-win blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2011-08-12 11:36 -0700
Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-12 11:42 -0700
Re: lcc-win Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-08-12 11:52 -0700
Re: lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-12 20:37 +0200
Re: lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-11 19:45 +0200
Re: lcc-win Ralf Damaschke <rwspam@gmx.de> - 2011-08-11 20:12 +0000
Re: lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-11 22:43 +0200
Re: lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-11 13:43 -0700
Re: lcc-win Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-12 08:50 +1200
Re: lcc-win gordonb.04sy5@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2011-08-12 19:54 -0500
csiph-web