Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #9272

Re: lcc-win

From James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: lcc-win
Date 2011-08-12 14:00 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <4E456A5A.7030107@verizon.net> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <4E43F408.20801@verizon.net> <6913a7fb-b7c5-4b25-86b2-32bb1a67d32f@l37g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <j2103d$gip$1@dont-email.me> <lnaabf9473.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <fb3f7063-8b9f-4a31-b14b-93c9d6d43567@z7g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 08/12/2011 01:20 PM, tom st denis wrote:
...
> Maybe Jacob could add an experimental mode in which errors/warnings
> were more standardized and helpful than that as required by the ISO C
> spec... :-)

I would hope that, like most real-world compilers, lcc-win32 already
does so in default mode. It would be pretty difficult to generate
diagnostics that are less standardized or less helpful than required by
the C standard. I'm not sure it's possible to provide diagnostics that
are less helpful than required by the C standard, since the standard
imposes no limits on how un-helpful a diagnostic could be.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-11 15:14 +0200
  Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-11 07:51 -0700
    Re: lcc-win James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-11 11:23 -0400
      Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-11 08:35 -0700
        Re: lcc-win James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-11 12:28 -0400
          Re: lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-11 11:46 -0700
            Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-12 10:20 -0700
              Re: lcc-win James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-12 14:00 -0400
                Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-12 11:23 -0700
                Re: lcc-win blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2011-08-12 11:36 -0700
                Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-12 11:42 -0700
                Re: lcc-win Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-08-12 11:52 -0700
                Re: lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-12 20:37 +0200
    Re: lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-11 19:45 +0200
      Re: lcc-win Ralf Damaschke <rwspam@gmx.de> - 2011-08-11 20:12 +0000
        Re: lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-11 22:43 +0200
        Re: lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-11 13:43 -0700
        Re: lcc-win Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-12 08:50 +1200
    Re: lcc-win gordonb.04sy5@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2011-08-12 19:54 -0500

csiph-web