Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: lcc-win |
| Date | 2011-08-11 19:45 +0200 |
| Organization | lccwin |
| Message-ID | <j214f8$mme$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <j20kj4$efl$1@speranza.aioe.org> <5b596b68-1a29-4ff3-94f5-54c10d8b1c18@hl8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> |
Le 11/08/11 16:51, tom st denis a écrit : > On Aug 11, 9:14 am, jacob navia<ja...@spamsink.net> wrote: >> The lcc-win compiler is a C99 compiler for windows systems. It can be > ... >> It is an experimental system, with several extensions to the C language > > These statements are incompatible. > You are just speaking nonsense, as you do very often. The C standard (in its 99 edition) says in 4.6: (page 7 in the 2007 pdf that I have) <quote> A conforming implementation may have extensions (including additional library functions), provided they do not alter the behavior of any strictly conforming program. <end quote> None of my extensions affects strictly conforming programs. I have never added ANY keyword, nor a reserved identifier. I have repeated this countless times since several YEARS but you (and your friends) ALWAYS bring up the same WRONG argument.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-11 15:14 +0200
Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-11 07:51 -0700
Re: lcc-win James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-11 11:23 -0400
Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-11 08:35 -0700
Re: lcc-win James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-11 12:28 -0400
Re: lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-11 11:46 -0700
Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-12 10:20 -0700
Re: lcc-win James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-12 14:00 -0400
Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-12 11:23 -0700
Re: lcc-win blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2011-08-12 11:36 -0700
Re: lcc-win tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-08-12 11:42 -0700
Re: lcc-win Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-08-12 11:52 -0700
Re: lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-12 20:37 +0200
Re: lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-11 19:45 +0200
Re: lcc-win Ralf Damaschke <rwspam@gmx.de> - 2011-08-11 20:12 +0000
Re: lcc-win jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-11 22:43 +0200
Re: lcc-win Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-11 13:43 -0700
Re: lcc-win Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-12 08:50 +1200
Re: lcc-win gordonb.04sy5@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2011-08-12 19:54 -0500
csiph-web