Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #111748
| Path | csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.unit0.net!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:42:36 -0500 |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.c |
| From | Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c, comp.lang.clipper |
| Subject | Re: Hamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage" |
| References | <ogs3uq$46m$1@dont-email.me> <0524jc9see1ca649hfd7dhcihfcuh9517n@4ax.com> <ogu0j0$hbn$1@dont-email.me> <3095jcpincobcr3d8i21khqnlm1e729n3m@4ax.com> <oh0pko$q07$1@dont-email.me> <e5e4c78c-8ecd-4cbb-866b-a401f26c1679@googlegroups.com> <oh1bk4$lln$1@dont-email.me> <5b7e37b0-bb32-4f44-8eca-47cc80cad727@googlegroups.com> <oh1drl$stf$3@dont-email.me> <6d656aa9-f2a8-46a0-86fc-950e3d495fa9@googlegroups.com> <oh2klr$e8s$5@dont-email.me> <oh5c35$edr$1@pcls7.std.com> <59ucjc9fk7fosbrf8mkc2r8rj1j5ucfeqb@4ax.com> <oh93ji$o18$4@dont-email.me> <oh97m8$7ps$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| Date | Wed, 07 Jun 2017 20:42:32 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <871sqv60uv.fsf@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:qbcyMEIkQl0xoSyPm0e8b5x1z9U= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Lines | 15 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| X-Trace | sv3-i1wXFoRopSKRw5zaZdYnyUlg6CYzmnkPwJgnrpIGso3gXp0U4l28S8n0Vkm/Orabx1UeOIdGZngI6eb!cIu3yZq9H2gawB6Tm71zgFwpxLlOBB/n83q2Cwb9Ix9puWa64Nw00n2BWKz1Z5tnyAkZ+EA= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 2026 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c:111748 comp.lang.clipper:1288 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Followups directed to: comp.lang.c
Show key headers only | View raw
acc <email@farlocca.it> writes: > Il 07/06/2017 16.49, Mr. Man-wai Chang ha scritto: > >> "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage" >> >> It's still a better explanation than "coverage". I think it's called >> Hamming Distance. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamming_distance > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levenshtein_distance In Levenshtein distance COFFEE is much the closer word. The reason people think its COVERAGE is from the context.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Hamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-06-07 22:49 +0800
Re: Hamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage" acc <email@farlocca.it> - 2017-06-07 17:55 +0200
Re: Hamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage" Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2017-06-07 20:42 +0100
Re: Hamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-06-09 22:05 +0800
csiph-web