Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.unit0.net!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:42:36 -0500 Followup-To: comp.lang.c From: Gareth Owen Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.clipper Subject: Re: Hamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage" References: <0524jc9see1ca649hfd7dhcihfcuh9517n@4ax.com> <3095jcpincobcr3d8i21khqnlm1e729n3m@4ax.com> <5b7e37b0-bb32-4f44-8eca-47cc80cad727@googlegroups.com> <6d656aa9-f2a8-46a0-86fc-950e3d495fa9@googlegroups.com> <59ucjc9fk7fosbrf8mkc2r8rj1j5ucfeqb@4ax.com> Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 20:42:32 +0100 Message-ID: <871sqv60uv.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:qbcyMEIkQl0xoSyPm0e8b5x1z9U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Lines: 15 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-i1wXFoRopSKRw5zaZdYnyUlg6CYzmnkPwJgnrpIGso3gXp0U4l28S8n0Vkm/Orabx1UeOIdGZngI6eb!cIu3yZq9H2gawB6Tm71zgFwpxLlOBB/n83q2Cwb9Ix9puWa64Nw00n2BWKz1Z5tnyAkZ+EA= X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 2026 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:111748 comp.lang.clipper:1288 acc writes: > Il 07/06/2017 16.49, Mr. Man-wai Chang ha scritto: > >> "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage" >> >> It's still a better explanation than "coverage". I think it's called >> Hamming Distance. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamming_distance > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levenshtein_distance In Levenshtein distance COFFEE is much the closer word. The reason people think its COVERAGE is from the context.